Determination Letter 1151026 Released December 23, 2011 Denied Transcribed from scan

IRS determination 1151026: IRS denies exemption to a grant-funded mobile-home project

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2011, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2011
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The IRS denied IRC § 501(c)(3) exemption to a proposed nonprofit that planned to obtain grants, build or lease mobile homes and cottages, and provide vocational training on property owned and operated by related for-profit businesses. The IRS concluded that the proposed activities would benefit the founders and their businesses through capital improvements, rental income, salaries, and access to grant funding. It also found that the housing development and sale or lease activities had a substantial non-exempt commercial purpose. The proposed adverse determination became final because the applicant did not file a protest within 30 days.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Does the proposed organization qualify for exemption under IRC § 501(c)(3)?
  • Outcome: Denied.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 170, 501, 6104, 6110, 7428; Treas. Reg. §§ 1.501(c)(3)-1(a)(1), 1.501(c)(3)-1(c)(2), 1.501(c)(3)-1(d)(1)(ii)

Full text (IRS public release)

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES

DIVISION
Release Number: 201151026 Contact Person:
Release Date: 12/23/2011
Date: September 27, 2011 Identification Number:
UIL Code: 501.32-00
501.33-00 Contact Number:
501.36-00
501.03-05 Employer Identification Number:
Form Required To Be Filed:
Tax Years:
Dear

This is our final determination that you do not qualify for exemption from federal income tax as
an organization described in Internal Revenue Code section 501(c)(3). Recently, we sent you a
letter in response to your application that proposed an adverse determination. The letter
explained the facts, law and rationale, and gave you 30 days to file a protest. Since we did not
receive a protest within the requisite 30 days, the proposed adverse determination is now final.

Since you do not qualify for exemption as an organization described in Code section 501(c)(3),
donors may not deduct contributions to you under Code section 170. You must file federal
income tax returns on the form and for the years listed above within 30 days of this letter, unless
you request an extension of time to file.

We will make this letter and our proposed adverse determination letter available for public
inspection under Code section 6110, after deleting certain identifying information. Please read
the enclosed Notice 437, Notice of Intention to Disclose, and review the two attached letters that
show our proposed deletions. If you disagree with our proposed deletions, you should follow
the instructions in Notice 437. If you agree with our deletions, you do not need to take any
further action.

In accordance with Code section 6104(c), we will notify the appropriate State officials of our
determination by sending them a copy of this final letter and the proposed adverse letter. You
should contact your State officials if you have any questions about how this determination may
affect your State responsibilities and requirements.

Letter 4038(CG) (11-2005)
Catalog Number 47632S

2

If you have any questions about this letter, please contact the person whose name and
telephone number are shown in the heading of this letter. If you have any questions about your
federal income tax status and responsibilities, please contact IRS Customer Service at
1-800-829-1040 or the IRS Customer Service number for businesses, 1-800-829-4933. The
IRS Customer Service number for people with hearing impairments is 1-800-829-4059.

Sincerely,

Lois Lerner
Director, Exempt Organizations

Enclosure
Notice 437
Redacted Proposed Adverse Determination Letter
Redacted Final Adverse Determination Letter

Letter 4038(CG) (11-2005)
Catalog Number 47632S

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION

Date: August 10, 2011 Contact Person:

Identification Number:
Contact Number:
FAX Number:

Employer Identification Number:

Legend: UIL #s:

B = individual 501.03.05
C = individual 501.32.00
D = individual 501.33.00
E = individual 501.36.00
F = individual
G = individual
H = business
J = individual
K = individual
L = business plan
M = business
N = business
P = state
Q = state
R = business
s = dollar amount
t = dollar amount
u = dollar amount
v = dollar amount
w = dollar amount
x = date
y = date
z = date

Dear

We have considered your application for recognition of exemption from federal income tax
under section 501(a) of the Internal Revenue Code as an organization described in section
501(c)(3). Based on the information submitted, we have concluded that you do not qualify
for exemption under that section. The basis for our conclusion is set forth below.

ISSUE

a. Are you formed to obtain grants primarily benefitting B and C through M? Yes, for
the reasons given below.

b. Will you operate in a commercial, non-exempt manner? Yes, for the reasons given
below.
c. Will your activities serve substantial non-exempt purposes contrary to Section

501(c)(3) of the Code? Yes, for the reasons stated below.
FACTS

B and C, owners/founders of M and N, were approached by J about opportunities to
pursue grants. J works for H, a professional grant writing company based in P.

M, a for profit business, is a mobile home park/community that operates on land owned by
B and C. M is also managed/operated by B and C. R was created with the intention of
learning the construction business so property of M could be further developed. R later
became N. B engaged in land reclamation activities such as the planning and design of
land parcels, clearing, grading, hauling, water and sewer construction, and road
construction. B owned and operated excavators, back hoes, bull dozers and dump trucks.
These experiences gave B the background he needed to begin company M in 2000 as
well as offered opportunities for B to gain insight into working with the public. N completed
much of the infrastructure work for M, although the building of the water and sewer pump
station and asphalt paving were subcontracted.

J informed B and C that H could provide specialized services focused primarily on, but not
limited to, the grant writing process. As a result, beginning on date y, H contracted with B
and C through M to perform the following:

Professional Business Services

  1. Executive summary

  2. Company structure

  3. Product and service description

  4. Marketing plan

  5. Three year financial projections

Grant Writing Services |

  1. Foundation research |
  2. Letter writing |
  3. Grant application preparation and packaging

  4. Grant writing

  5. Consulting clients on best avenue to reach grant funding goals

As part of the grant writing process H has promised over $ would be secured and
paid to either you or M. B and C have paid H over $ to date for all contracted
services.

As part of this process for obtaining grants B and C were instructed by H to form a non-
profit entity and file Form 1023 for exemption. Another contract was created for H to aid in
this service. A Charter with filed Articles, a corporate minute book with Bylaws, sample
minutes, a corporate seal and customized stock certificates would be received. Under the
guidance of H, on date x, you were incorporated in the state of P and Form 1023 was
submitted on date z.

B also investigated what section 501(c)(3) required and discussed his findings with K, a
Senior Case Manager with H. B could reach the goals of providing affordable housing,
preserving natural environments, and offering educational opportunities related to the
housing and environmental aspects through your organization. B stated these goals
seemed to be a natural fit for section 501(c)(3) when B looked at Part Ill section 1 of Form
1023 which states, “Section 501(c)(3) requires that organization’s documents list their
exempt purpose(s), such as charitable, religious, educational and/or scientific purposes’.
B stated that at least three of the purposes would fit your activities.

When asked why you applied for exemption, you stated that B was pursuing small
business grants for B’s for-profit company M, when you were contacted about H’s grant
services. B first conducted research on H (found them in good standing) and then
proceeded to sign contracts with H for grant writing services for B’s for-profit company, M.
You stated that H is acting as a conduit and/or facilitator to assist B to seek grant funding
from foundations for M.

Your Articles of Incorporation list G as the registered agent and F as the incorporator. Both
G and F are affiliated with H. Your Articles and Bylaws both state you are organized for
exclusively 501(c)(3) purposes.

Your governing body includes B as president, D as treasurer, and E as secretary.

Your stated mission is to share the blessing of residing in the Low County of State Q so
that others may have improved quality of life through affordable residences, access to
natural landscapes, and opportunities that will foster growth as a family and a community.
You have access to numerous leased lots on 35 acres of land where mobile homes can be

installed and offered to people whose modest incomes do not allow them to live in more
affluent communities. You describe the property as having brick underpinning, paved
driveways, spacious decks, and landscaped yards. Roads are paved with curbs, gutters,
street lights, underground utilities, and public water and sewer are already operational.
Unlike other mobile home parks in the area, this community offers large lots with mature
trees in a natural setting. The web site for M also reflects similar information on the
community.

Your Executive Summary states that you are a start-up nonprofit foundation that seeks to
provide affordable housing and hands on vocational education experiences. You will
operate in an already established for-profit mobile home community, to provide housing
opportunities to persons of moderate incomes. You plan to lease or rent mobile homes
and 2-bedroom energy-efficient “green” cottages. You hope to sell some of the mobile
home units to interested tenants once the economy becomes profitable again. You will
purchase each 1400sq. ft. mobile home for $s and construct each 1200 sq. ft. energy
efficient cottage for a cost of $t.

You will secure leases for sixteen lots, place mobile homes on ten of them, build cottages
on five, and build one office/apartment building. You state if funding is received, you will
add more residences for sale or lease with a percentage of the proceeds used for
charitable purposes and improving community amenities. Additionally, you want to
construct a nature walk through the wetlands, a picnic area by the lake, and add
playground equipment. All improvements and additions are being done on the 35 acres of
land operated by M and owned by B and C.

The lots referenced in your plan are provided through a lease agreement with M, and
financial resources for the homes, cottages, equipment, and employees will be provided
through grant funding. Income from rentals and leases will eventually allow you to support
your activities.

Your business plan has a section for ‘Milestones’. Under that section the following planned
implementations were included:

  • Pay off mortgage on infrastructure costs
  • 3-1400 sq. ft mobile homes 3-bdrm

  • Purchase % ton long bed company truck

  • Mini excavator

  • Equipment trailer

  • Ford E-350 15-passenger van

  • Track loader

  • Farm tractor

  • Playground equipment

  • 7 1400 sq. ft mobile home 3-bdrm

  • Construct nature walk/picnic

  • Construction of 5 1200 sq ft cottages
  • Construct office building.

Each of these milestones had exact cost figures listed with cost projections ranging from
less then $5000 to over $1000000 (totaling over $2000000) that you anticipated paying
through the promised funding.

Your current physical location is an office within a maintenance building of M. You
explained that funding received by M would pay off the mortgage of the property owned by
B and C and that you would then have a 20 year lease of that property. The rental income
from this lease would then pay off additional mortgage debt incurred by M from
infrastructure construction done on the surrounding properties owned by B and C. While
you provided executed agreements for the use of equipment and other facilities from M,
you did not provide a signed and dated copy of the rental agreement for the use of the
building office. Paying down this existing infrastructure debt will entitle you access to
numerous leased lots on 35 acres of land (owned by B and C).where mobile homes can
be installed and offered to people whose modest incomes do not allow them to live in
more affluent communities.

While you listed zero dollars in revenue and expenses on Form 1023 your business plan
shows you anticipate approximately $4000000 in revenue primarily consisting of
government and private grants. Of that you project approximately $3000000 in expenses
including payroll, marketing, construction expenses, depreciation and asset purchases.
Start-up expenses would include creation as a legal entity, the business plan, and pursuit
of grant funds which have been paid for from B and C’s personal funds. You will
reimburse B and C for those expenses when grant funding is attained. The balance sheet
in your business plan also shows excess funding will actually satisfy a current mortgage
once grant funding is received.

B and C are the primary members of your management team. B will manage all aspects
of the park, related construction tasks and responsibilities, receiving a salary in the amount
of $u. C will serve as the administrative secretary/bookkeeper, and receive a salary of $v.
The two officers, individual D (treasurer) and individual E (secretary) will also serve as
consultants and receive a salary of $w each, annually.

LAW

Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code provides for the exemption from federal
income tax of corporations organized and operated exclusively for charitable, educational,
and other purposes, provided that no part of the net earnings inure to the benefit of any
private shareholder or individual.

Section 1.501(c)(3)-1(a)(1) of the Income Tax Regulations provides that, in order to be
exempt as an organization described in section 501(c)(3), an organization must be both
organized and operated exclusively for one or more of the purposes specified in such
section. If an organization fails to meet either the organizational test or the operational
test, it is not exempt.

Section 1.501(c)(3)-1(c)(2) of the regulations provides an organization is not operated
exclusively for one or more exempt purposes if its net earnings inure in whole or in part to
the benefit of private shareholders or individuals.

Section 1.501(c)(3)-1(d)(1)(ii) of the regulations provides an organization is not organized
and operated exclusively for one or more exempt purposes unless it serves public rather
than private interests. Thus, to meet the requirement it is necessary for an organization to
establish that it is not organized and operated for the benefit of private interests such as
designated individuals, the creator or his family, shareholders of the organization, or
persons controlled, directly or indirectly, by such private interests.

In Better Business Bureau of Washington D.C.., Inc. v. United States, 326 U.S. 279 (1945),
the Supreme Court held that the presence of a single non-exempt purpose, if substantial in
nature, will destroy the exemption regardless of the number or importance of truly exempt
purposes.

American Institute for Economic Research v. United States, 302 F. 2d 934 (Ct. Cl. 1962),
The Court considered an organization that provided analyses of securities and industries
and of the economic climate in general. It sold subscriptions to various periodicals and
services providing advice for purchases of individual securities. The court noted that
education is a broad concept, and assumed arguendo that the organization had an
educational purpose. However, the totality of the organization’s activities, which included
the sale of many publications as well as the sale of advice for a fee to individuals, was
indicative of a business. Therefore, the court held that the organization had a significant
non-exempt commercial purpose that was not incidental to the educational purpose, and
was not entitled to be regarded as exempt.

Church by Mail, Inc. v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo 1984-349, aff'd 765 F. 2d 1387 (9th Cir.
1985) Church by Mail sent out sermons in numerous mailings which required a great deal
of printing services. A for-profit company, controlled by the same ministers, provided the
printing and the mailing. The services were provided under two contracts. The contracts
were signed by the two ministers for both the organization and the for-profit company. The
organization’s business comprised two-thirds of the overall business done by the for-profit
company. The court determined that there was ample evidence in the record to support
the finding that the organization was operated for the substantial non-exempt purpose of
providing a market for the services of the for-profit company. The Court of Appeals pointed
out that "the critical inquiry is not whether particular contractual payments to a related for-
profit organization are reasonable or excessive, but instead whether the entire enterprise

is carried on in such a manner that the for-profit organization benefits substantially from
the operation of the Church." Moreover, the ministers’ dual control of both the Church and
the for-profit company enables them to profit from the affiliation of the two entities through
increased compensation.

In International Postgraduate Medical Foundation v. Commissioner, TCM 1989-36, the
Tax Court concluded that when a for-profit organization benefits substantially from the
manner in which the activities of a related nonprofit organization were carried on, the latter
organization was not operated exclusively for exempt purposes within the meaning of
section 501(c)(3), even if it furthers other exempt purposes.

KJ's Fund Raisers, Inc. v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo 1997-424 (1997), affirmed 82 AFTR
2d 7092 (1998) While the organization raised money for charitable purposes, it also
operated for the substantial benefit of private interests. The organization's founders were
the sole owners of a bar, KJ's Place. The organization sold lottery tickets exclusively at
KJ's Place during regular business hours. While in KJ's Place, the lottery ticket
purchasers were sold beverages. The initial directors were the two founders and a related
individual. The initial board was replaced several times until the two founders were no
longer on the board. At all times these two individuals were the organization's officers,
salaries had been paid to them and rent had been paid to KJ's Place. The organization
maintained that the fact that salaries and rent were no longer paid in this fashion indicated
the independence of the board. The Court took another view: "Although those practices
ceased and are not in issue here, the current board of directors is composed of at least the
majority of the same members who allowed those amounts to be paid."

APPLICATION OF LAW:

You are not organized and operated exclusively for charitable, educational, or religious
purposes consistent with Section 501(c )(3) of the Code nor Section 1.501 (c)(3)-1(a)(1) of
the Income Tax Regulations and therefore fail to meet the operational test. Specifically,
you were formed for the purpose of obtaining non-profit grant funding used to make capital
improvements to land owned by B and C and operated by their for-profit company, M
thereby serving the private interests of B and C.

You do not meet the provisions of Section 1.501(c)(3)-1(c)(2) of the regulations as funding
to your organization will be used to further the personal interests of B and C. As you have
stated, funding that is secured through your organization will be used to pay off existing
infrastructure debt on property owned by B and C through M as well as to make capital
improvements on the same property. In addition, funding will be used to compensate B
and C in reclaiming funds expensed for services provided by H. You also do not meet the
provisions of Section 1.501(c)(3)-1(d)(1)(ii). As you are set up to benefit B and C directly,
inurement is present, so you are also serving substantial private interests.

As seen in the Better Business Bureau ruling, the presence of any non exempt purpose, if
substantial in nature, will preclude exemption. Despite your educational activities of
training individuals your overall purpose is to further benefit the business of M and its
founders, B and C, improving the property on which M operates as well as using your
organization as a vehicle for which to obtain grant funding for M.

Consistent with the American Institute for Economic Research ruling, because your
primary purpose is to construct, for sale or lease, manufactured homes on property owned
by B and C, and then generate rental income through those homes, you are operating in a
commercial manner indistinguishable from the activities conducted by M and N. Because
you are operating for commercial purposes you do not qualify for exemption under
501(c)(3).

Similar to the organization in KJ's Fund Raisers, as the same individual (B) that will have
control over your operations will also be simultaneously managing M private rather then
public interests are being served. The decision to use M and N’s property, equipment and
facilities demonstrates a lack of public oversight and/or control and limited public benefit
and private interests are being served. Improvements made on site through your training
programs directly benefit the owners, B and C. You are structured to allow for the flow of
funds to M through any grant funding that is received. Additionally, although C is not a
positioned member of your governing body, she directly benefits as well through her
relationship with B.

Similar to the organization in Church by Mail, dual control exists between certain members
of your board and M that enables those owners of M, your founders, to benefit from this
relationship. Through your activities M will be funded through grant applications and rental
income while capital improvements will be done to properties under M’s control. Further,
the owners of M, B and C, will be receiving salaries and rent through lease agreements for
the use of those facilities for your exempt activity Like the organization in International
Postgraduate Medical Foundation, M benefits substantially from your operations in the
form of the receipt of public funding to expand and supplement its business purposes.
Because you are formed to further private interests through your operations you do not
qualify for exemption under Section 501(c)(3).

APPLICANT’S POSITION

You stated the following:

  • The information submitted thus far was created a long time ago and that your
    activities now are educational by providing vocational training for students to
    receive hands-on training in the construction field.

  • Your purpose is to create educational opportunities for students to participate in
    hands-on experiences that are related to the construction industry.

The grant money received for the for-profit will be used to improve the mobile home
community owned by for-profit company M.

Money generated by for-profit company M through its current business operations
and grant money specifically earmarked for the for-profit company M will be used to
make improvements to for-profit company M, Mobile Home Community.

The grant money received by you will be for salaries and buying equipment used for
the vocational training of students.

Payroll or salaries will be used for classroom instruction and minimal administrative
costs associated with the foundation. Many hands-on activities will not improve the
property on which they occur because these activities will be happening over the
over again. (i.e. finding property corners, identifying setback, creating a mock site
plan based on lot size, using equipment to dig and trench and then refill it). If
improvements to property are made, those improvements will only occur on land
that belongs to you. The long term goal is for you to secure your own facility for
educational purposes.

Everything the non-profit purchases will be owned by the non-profit.

All assets of the foundation will remain assets of yours. You hope to purchase a
15-passenger van to transport students; it will belong to you only. You hope to
purchase some equipment for training purposes; that equipment will belong to you.

SERVICE RESPONSE TO APPLICANT’S POSITION

Your Articles of Incorporation were filed on x and your signed contracts were signed
in April, May, and June of 2010, respectively. Your business plan was for the years
2010, 2011, and 2012. Your application for exemption was filed in June 2010.
These recent facts contradict your assertion that the operational information you
have presented thus far is obsolete.

You indicated that your exempt purpose would be to provide educational
opportunities for students in the field of home construction. While this purpose
could be considered educational under Section 501( c)(3) of the Code, the
construction of homes on property owned by B and C constitutes inurement to
insiders which bars exemption under Section 501( c)(3) of the Code. In addition,
the future rental or sale of homes is a substantial non-exempt commercial purpose
contrary to Section 501 (c)(3).

While you indicated that future grant funds received by you as well as the for-profit,
M, will be kept separate, your grant funds will be used to provide for the capital
improvement of land owned by B and C, who are your insiders. This circumstance
qualifies as inurement to insiders and is prohibited under Section 501 (c )(3) of the
Internal Revenue Code.

10

  • Lastly, you indicate that improvements to property via the construction of homes will
    be made only to property you own as its your long term goal to secure your own
    facility. The facts, however, demonstrate that current capital improvements will be
    made to property owned by B and C which will be leased to you. This situation
    constitutes inurement of earnings and is a bar to exemption under Section 501(
    c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code.

CONCLUSION

You do not meet the requirements under section 501(c)(3) because you fail the
operational test. Your primary purpose is operation of a mobile home community allowing
vocational students to develop and expand B and C’s property. We find that you operate
for non-exempt commercial purposes and for the private interests of B and C through M.
Accordingly, you do not qualify for exemption as an organization described in section
501(c)(3) of the Code.

Consideration was given to whether the applicant organization qualifies for exemption
under other subsections of section 501(c) of the Code. However, based on the
information that you have submitted, we cannot find that you are entitled to exempt status
under section 501(c) of the Code because you are operating for a significant non-exempt
commercial purpose and for the private interests of B and C.

Based on the above facts and law, we conclude that you do not qualify for exemption
under section 501(c)(3).

You have the right to file a protest if you believe this determination is incorrect. To protest,
you must submit a statement of your views and fully explain your reasoning. You must
submit the statement, signed by one of your officers, within 30 days from the date of this
letter. We will consider your statement and decide if the information affects our
determination. If your statement does not provide a basis to reconsider our determination,
we will forward your case to our Appeals Office. You can find more information about the
role of the Appeals Office in Publication 892; Exempt Organization Appeal Procedures for
Unagreed Issues.

Types of information that should be included in your appeal can be found on page 2 of
Publication 892, under the heading “Regional Office Appeal”. These items include:

  1. The organization’s name, address, and employer identification number;
  2. A statement that the organization wants to appeal the determination;
  3. The date and symbols on the determination letter;

11

  1. A statement of facts supporting the organization’s position in any contested factual
    issue;

  2. A statement outlining the law or other authority the organization is relying on; and

  3. A statement as to whether a hearing is desired.

The statement of facts (item 4) must be declared true under penalties of perjury. This may
be done by adding to the appeal the following signed declaration:

“Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have examined the statement of facts
presented in this appeal and in any accompanying schedules and statements and, to the
best of my knowledge and belief, they are true, correct, and complete.”

Your appeal will be considered incomplete without this statement.

If an organization’s representative submits the appeal, a substitute declaration must be
included stating that the representative prepared the appeal and accompanying
documents; and whether the representative knows personally that the statements of facts
contained in the appeal and accompanying documents are true and correct.

An attorney, certified public accountant, or an individual enrolled to practice before the
Internal Revenue Service may represent you during the appeal process. If you want
representation during the appeal process, you must file a proper power of attorney, Form
2848, Power of Attorney and Declaration of Representative, if you have not already done
so. You can find more information about representation in Publication 947, Practice
before the IRS and Power of Attorney. All forms and publications mentioned in this letter
can be found at www.irs.gov, Forms and Publications.

If you do not file a protest within 30 days, you will not be able to file a suit for declaratory
judgment in court because the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) will consider the failure to
appeal as a failure to exhaust available administrative remedies. Code section 7428(b)(2)
provides, in part, that a declaratory judgment or decree shall not be issued in any
proceeding unless the Tax Court, the United States Court of Federal Claims, or the District
Court of the United States for the District of Columbia determines that the organization
involved has exhausted all of the administrative remedies available to it within the IRS.

If you do not intend to protest this determination, you do not need to take any further
action. If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will issue a final adverse
determination letter. That letter will provide information about filing tax returns and other
matters.

Please send your protest statement, Form 2848, and any supporting documents to the
applicable address:

Mail to: Deliver to:

Internal Revenue Service Internal Revenue Service

EO Determinations Quality Assurance EO Determinations Quality Assurance
Room 7-008 550 Main Street, Room 7-008

P.O. Box 2508 Cincinnati, OH 45202

Cincinnati, OH 45201
You may fax your statement using the fax number shown in the heading of this letter. If
you fax your statement, please call the person identified in the heading of this letter to
confirm that he or she received your fax.

If you have any questions, please contact the person whose name and telephone number
are shown in the heading of this letter.

Sincerely,

Lois Lerner
Director, Exempt Organizations

Enclosures
Publication 892

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2011, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.