PLR 201150030: IRS preserved an S election after an inadvertent second-class-of-stock concern
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2011, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The IRS considered whether a corporation's disproportionate advances to its shareholders may have created a second class of stock and terminated its S election. The corporation said its governing documents provided for one class of stock and that it did not intend to create another class. After discovering the issue, the corporation and its shareholders formalized the loan arrangements, made specified repayments, and agreed to make any adjustments required by the Commissioner. The IRS ruled that any termination was inadvertent and that the corrective actions did not create a second class of stock, so the corporation would continue to be treated as an S corporation for the specified year and afterward, provided its election was not otherwise terminated.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Could disproportionate shareholder advances have terminated the corporation's S election, and did the corrective actions qualify for relief?
- Outcome: approved
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 1361(b)(1)(D) and 1362(d)(2), (f); Treas. Reg. §§ 1.1361-1 and 1.1362-4.
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 201150030
Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 12/16/2011
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Person To Contact:
Index Number: 1362.04-00, 1361.01-04
-----------, ID No. -----------------
Telephone Number:
---------------------
------------------------------------
Refer Reply To:
---------------------------------------
CC:PSI:B01
----------------------
PLR-117920-11
-----------------------------
Date:
August 29, 2011
Legend:
X = ------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------
State = --------------
D1 = ---------------------------
D2 = ----------------------
Year = -------
Dear ---------------------:
This responds to the letter dated April 19, 2011, and related correspondence, submitted on behalf of X, requesting relief under § 1362(f) of the Internal Revenue Code (“Code”) for an inadvertent termination of S election.
FACTS
The information submitted states that X was incorporated under the laws of State on D1. X elected to be treated as an S corporation, effective D2. Beginning in Year, X made disproportionate advances to its shareholders based on certain loan arrangements. X determined that if the advances are viewed as disproportionate distributions, X may have inadvertently created a second class of stock in violation of the one class of stock requirement under § 1361(b)(1)(D).
X represents that its governing provisions provide for one class of stock, and that it did not intend to create a second class of stock or terminate its S election. Immediately after the discovery of the errors, X and its shareholders took corrective actions: (1) X and its shareholders formalized the loan arrangements with written agreements, (2) the shareholders of X paid off a portion of loans plus interests to X pursuant to the formalized loan agreements, and (3) X paid off its loans to an entity to which the shareholders of X were indirect owners. In addition, X and its shareholders agree to make any adjustments required by the Commissioner consistent with the treatment of X as an S corporation.
LAW AND ANALYSIS
Section 1361(a)(1) provides that the term “S corporation” means, with respect to any taxable year, a small business corporation for which an election under § 1362(a) is in effect for the year.
Section 1361(b)(1)(D) provides that, for purposes of subchapter S, the term “small business corporation” means a domestic corporation that is not an ineligible corporation and that does not, among other things, have more than one class of stock.
Section 1.1361-1(I)(1) of the Income Tax Regulations provides that a corporation is generally treated as having only one class of stock if all outstanding shares of stock of the corporation confer identical rights to distribution and liquidation proceeds.
Section 1.1361-1(I)(2)(i) provides that the determination of whether all outstanding shares of stock confer identical rights to distribution and liquidation proceeds is made based on the corporate charter, articles of incorporation, bylaws, applicable state law, and binding agreements relating to distribution and liquidation proceeds (collectively, the “governing provisions”). A commercial contractual agreement, such as a lease, employment agreement, or loan agreement, is not a binding agreement relating to distribution and liquidation proceeds and thus is not a governing provision unless a principal purpose of the agreement is to circumvent the one class of stock requirement. Although a corporation is not treated as having more than one class of stock so long as the governing provisions provide for identical distribution and liquidation rights, any distributions (including actual, constructive, or deemed distributions) that differ in timing or amount are to be given appropriate tax effect in accordance with the facts and circumstances.
Section 1362(d)(2)(A) provides that an election under §1362(a) shall be terminated whenever (at any time on or after the first day of the first taxable year for which the corporation is an S corporation) such corporation ceases to be a small business corporation.
Section 1362(f) provides, in part, that if (1) an election under § 1362(a) by any corporation (A) was not effective for the taxable year for which made (determined without regard to § 1362(b)(2)) by reason of a failure to meet the requirements of § 1361(b) or to obtain shareholder consent, or (B) was terminated under § 1362(d)(2) or (3), (2) the Secretary determines that the circumstances resulting in such ineffectiveness or termination were inadvertent, (3) no later than a reasonable period of time after discovery of the circumstances resulting in the ineffectiveness or termination, steps were taken - (A) so that the corporation is a small business corporation, or (B) to acquire the required shareholder consents, and (4) the corporation, and each person who was a shareholder of the corporation at any time during the period specified pursuant to this subsection, agrees to make such adjustments (consistent with the treatment of the corporation as an S corporation) as may be required by the Secretary with respect to such period, then, notwithstanding the circumstances resulting in such ineffectiveness or termination, such corporation shall be treated as an S corporation during the period specified by the Secretary.
Section 1.1362-4(d) provides that the Commissioner may require any adjustments that are appropriate. In general, the adjustments required should be consistent with the treatment of the corporation as an S corporation during the period specified by the Commissioner.
CONCLUSION
Based solely upon the facts submitted and the representations made, we conclude that X’s S election may have terminated because X may have had more than one class of stock. However, we conclude that, if X’s S election was terminated, such a termination was inadvertent within the meaning of § 1362(f) of the Code. Further, we conclude that the corrective actions taken by X and its shareholders does not create a second class of stock under § 1361. Consequently, we rule that X will be treated as continuing to be an S corporation for Year, and thereafter, provided that X’s S election is not otherwise terminated under § 1362(d).
Except as specifically ruled upon above, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the tax consequences of any facts discussed or referenced in this letter.
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, copies of this letter ruling will be sent to your authorized representatives.
Sincerely,
David R. Haglund
David R. Haglund
Chief, Branch 1
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs and Special Industries)
Enclosures (2)
Copy of this letter
Copy for § 6110 purposes
cc:
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace