PLR 201147019: IRS grants extra time to claim a consolidated-group stock loss

Number
201147019
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Loss Disallowance; Regulation Section 1.337(d); Loss on Stock of Subsidiary
Code sections
§ 337, § 1502, § 6662, § 301.9100-1, § 301.9100-2, § 301.9100-3, § 6110
Ruling dated
August 24, 2011
Publicly released
November 25, 2011

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2011, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2011
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A consolidated group asked the IRS for more time to file the statement needed to claim a loss on its subsidiary's stock under Treas. Reg. § 1.337(d)-2(c). The statement was required with the group's return, but the group did not file it after selling all the subsidiary's stock. The IRS found that the group acted reasonably and in good faith, relied on a qualified tax professional, and sought relief before the IRS discovered the omission. It granted a 60-day extension, subject to a condition that the group's aggregate tax liability not be lower than it would have been if the election had been timely. The ruling did not decide whether the group substantively qualified for the deduction or the amount of any allowable loss.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May the consolidated group file late the statement required to claim the subsidiary stock loss?
  • Outcome: Approved, subject to the ruling's tax-liability condition and substantive qualification review.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 337, 6662, and 6110(k)(3); Treas. Reg. §§ 1.337(d)-2 and 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3.

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201147019
Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 11/25/2011
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Person To Contact:
--------------------------, ID No. -----------------
------------------------------------------------------
Telephone Number:
Index Number: 337.16-00, 9100.29-00
---------------------
Refer Reply To:

---------------------------
CC:CORP:B05
---------------------------------
PLR-125786-11
Date:
-----------------
August 24, 2011
--------------------
------------------------------

TY:-----------------------

Legend

Taxpayer = -----------------
-----------------------
-------------------------------

Sub1 = -----------------------------------
-----------------------
-------------------------------

Sub2 = -----------------------------
-----------------------
-------------------------------

Unrelated Buyer = -----------------------

Date 1 = ---------------------------

Date 2 = -----------------------

Company Official 1 = --------------------------------------------
-----------------

Company Official 2 = ----------------------------------------------------------
-----------------
PLR-125786-11
2

Tax Professional = -----------------------------------
----------------------------------------

Dear -----------------:

This letter responds to a letter dated June 16, 2011, requesting on behalf of Taxpayer an extension of time under §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations to file a statement under § 1.337(d)-2(c) of the Income Tax Regulations (hereinafter referred to as the “Election”) that was required to be filed with Taxpayer’s consolidated Federal income tax return for the taxable year ending Date2. Additional information was provided in correspondence dated August 1, 2011. The material information is summarized below.

Taxpayer is the common parent of a consolidated group that included (among other subsidiaries) Sub1 and Sub2. Taxpayer owns 100% of Sub1. Sub1 owned 100% of Sub2.

On Date1, Sub1 sold 100% of the stock of Sub2 to Unrelated Buyer. Sub1 recognized a loss with respect to shares of Sub2.

An election under § 1.337(d)-2(c) to deduct the loss recognized on the disposition of Sub2 stock was required to be filed with or as a part of the Taxpayer consolidated group’s Federal income tax return for the year of the disposition. However, for various reasons, the Election was not filed. Subsequently, this request was submitted under § 301.9100-3 for an extension of time to file the Election. Taxpayer has represented that it is not seeking to alter a return position for which an accuracy-related penalty has been or could have been imposed under § 6662 of the Internal Revenue Code (“the Code”).

Section 1.337(d)-2(a)(1) provides a general rule that no deduction is allowed for any loss recognized by a member of a consolidated group with respect to the disposition of stock of a subsidiary.

Section 1.337(d)-2(a)(2)(ii) provides that a disposition means any event in which gain or loss is recognized, in whole or in part.

Section 1.337(d)-2(c)(1) provides that § 1.337(d)-2(c) applies with respect to stock of a subsidiary only if a separate statement entitled “§ 1.337(d)-2(c) statement” is included with the return in accordance with § 1.337(d)-2(c)(3).

Section 1.337(d)-2(c)(2) provides that loss is not disallowed under § 1.337(d)- 2(a)(1) to the extent the taxpayer establishes that the loss is not attributable to the
PLR-125786-11
3

recognition of built-in gain, net of directly related expenses, on the disposition of an asset (including stock and securities).

Section 1.337(d)-2(c)(3) provides that the statement required under § 1.337(d)- 2(c)(1) must be included with or as part of the taxpayer’s return for the year of the disposition or deconsolidation.

Generally, § 1.337(d)-2 applies with respect to dispositions and deconsolidations on or after March 3, 2005, and before September 17, 2008.

Section 301.9100-1(a) cites §§ 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 as providing the standards the Commissioner will use to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make a regulatory election. Under § 301.9100-1(c), the Commissioner has discretion to grant a reasonable extension of time to make a regulatory election, or a statutory election (but no more than six months except in the case of a taxpayer who is abroad), under all subtitles of the Code except subtitles E, G, H, and I.

Section 301.9100-2 provides automatic extensions of time for making certain elections while § 301.9100-3 provides for extensions of time for making regulatory elections that do not meet the requirements of § 301.9100-2. Section 301.9100-3(a) provides requests for relief will be granted when the taxpayer provides evidence to establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and that granting relief will not prejudice the interests of the government.

In this case, the time for filing the Election is fixed by the regulations (i.e., § 1.337(d)-2(c)(3)). Therefore, the Commissioner has discretionary authority under § 301.9100-3 to grant an extension of time for Taxpayer to file the Election, provided Taxpayer establishes that it acted reasonably and in good faith, that the requirements of §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 are satisfied, and that granting relief will not prejudice the interests of the government.

Information, affidavits, and representations submitted by Taxpayer, Company Official 1, Company Official 2, and Tax Professional explain the circumstances that resulted in the failure to timely file a valid Election. The information establishes the request for relief was filed before the failure to make the election was discovered by the Internal Revenue Service, and Taxpayer reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional who failed to make or advise Taxpayer to make the Election. See §§ 301.9100-3(b)(1)(i) and (v).

Based on the facts and information submitted, including the representations that have been made, we conclude that Taxpayer has established it acted reasonably and in good faith in failing to timely file the Election, the requirements of §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 are satisfied, and granting relief will not prejudice the interests of the
PLR-125786-11
4

government. Accordingly, we grant an extension of time, under § 301.9100-3, until 60 days from the date on this letter for Taxpayer to file the Election with respect to the disposition of Sub2.

The 60-day extension of time is conditioned on Taxpayer’s consolidated group’s tax liability, if any, not being lower, in the aggregate for all years to which the Election applies, than it would have been if the Election had been made timely (taking into account the time value of money).

We express no opinion with respect to whether Taxpayer qualifies substantively to make the Election. Specifically, no opinion is expressed regarding the amount, if any, of allowable loss with respect to the sale of Sub2 stock. In addition, no opinion is expressed as to the tax effects or consequences of filing the Election late under the provisions of any other section of the Code and regulations, or as to the tax treatment of any conditions existing at the time of, or resulting from, filing the Election late that are not specifically set forth in the above ruling. For purposes of granting relief under § 301.9100-3, we relied on certain statements and representations made by the Taxpayer and its representatives. However, all of the essential facts must be verified. In addition, notwithstanding that an extension is granted under § 301.9100-3 to file the Election, penalties and interest that would otherwise be applicable, if any, continue to apply. No opinion is expressed as to Taxpayer’s consolidated group’s tax liability for the years involved. A determination thereof will be made upon audit of the Federal income tax returns involved.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

A copy of this letter must be attached to any income tax return to which it is relevant. Alternatively, taxpayers filing their returns electronically may satisfy this requirement by attaching a statement to their return that provides the date and control number of the letter ruling.

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is being sent to your authorized representatives.

Sincerely,

_Ken Cohen_______
Ken Cohen
Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 3
Office of Associate Chief Counsel(Corporate)

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace