PLR 1144019: IRS grants late-filing relief for a Form 1128 tax-year change
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2011, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The taxpayers asked the IRS to treat a late Form 1128 as timely. The form sought to change their federal tax year from a November 30 year-end to a December 31 year-end. The IRS found that they acted reasonably and in good faith, and that relief would not prejudice the government, so it granted relief under § 301.9100-3. The ruling addresses only the late-filing relief and expresses no opinion on whether the requested tax-year change otherwise qualifies under the Code, regulations, or Rev. Proc. 2006-45.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Should the taxpayers' late Form 1128 be treated as timely filed under § 301.9100-3?
- Outcome: approved
- Key authorities: IRC § 442; Treas. Reg. §§ 1.442-1(b)(1), 301.9100-2, and 301.9100-3
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 201144019 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 11/4/2011 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 9100.00-00
Person To Contact:
-------------------------- ----------------------, ID No. ------------
---------------------- Telephone Number:
------------------------------------------- --------------------
----------------------- Refer Reply To:
--------------------------------- CC:ITA:B05
PLR-126580-11
Date:
July 27, 2011
Taxpayers: ----------------------------
EIN: ----------------
Year: -------
Dear ----------------:
This ruling is in reference to Taxpayers’ request that their Form 1128, “Application To
Adopt, Change, or Retain a Tax Year,” be considered timely filed under the authority
in § 301.9100-3 of the Procedures and Administration Regulations. Taxpayers’ filed a
late Form 1128 to change their accounting period, for federal income tax purposes,
from a taxable year ending November 30, to a taxable year ending December 31,
effective December 31, Year.
Rev. Proc. 2006-45, 2006-2 C.B. 851, as modified and clarified by Rev. Proc. 2007-64,
2007-2 C.B. 818, provides procedures for certain corporations to obtain automatic
approval to change their annual accounting period under § 442 of the Internal Revenue
Code. A corporation complying with all the applicable provisions of this revenue
procedure will be deemed to have obtained the approval of the Commissioner of the
Internal Revenue Service to change its annual accounting period. Section 7.02(2)(a) of
Rev. Proc. 2006-45 provides that a Form 1128 filed pursuant to the revenue procedure
will be considered timely filed for purposes of § 1.442-1(b)(1) of the Income Tax
Regulations only if it is filed on or before the time (including extensions) for filing the
return for the short period required to effect such change.
The information furnished indicates that Taxpayers did not file their Form 1128 by the
due date of the return for the short period required to effect such change and did not
request an extension of time to file their return. However, Taxpayers filed their Form
1128 under § 301.9100-3 soon thereafter.
PLR-126580-11 2
Section 301.9100-3(a) provides that requests for extensions of time for regulatory
elections that do not meet the requirements of § 301.9100-2 (automatic extensions),
such as the instant case, must be made under the rules of § 301.9100-3. Request for
relief subject to § 301.9100-3 will be granted when the taxpayer provides evidence to
establish that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and that the granting of
relief will not prejudice the interest of the government.
Based on the facts and information submitted and the representations made, we
conclude that Taxpayers have acted reasonably and in good faith, and that the granting
of relief will not prejudice the interest of the government. Accordingly, Taxpayers have
satisfied the requirements of the regulations for the granting of relief, and Taxpayers’
late-filed Form 1128 requesting to change to a taxable year ending December 31,
effective December 31, Year, is considered timely filed.
Because a change in period under Rev. Proc. 2006-45 is under the jurisdiction of the
Director, Internal Revenue Service Center, where taxpayers’ returns are filed, we have
forwarded the application to the ---------------------, Utah Service Center. Any further
communication regarding this matter should be directed to the Service Center.
This ruling is based upon facts and representations submitted by Taxpayers and
accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party.
This office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for
a ruling. However, as part of an examination process, the Service may verify the factual
information, representations, and other data submitted.
This ruling addresses the granting of § 301.9100-3 relief only. We express no opinion
regarding the tax treatment of the instant transaction under the provisions of any other
section of the Code or the regulations that may be applicable, or regarding the tax
treatment of any conditions existing at the time of, or effects resulting from, the instant
transaction. Specifically, we express no opinion as to whether Taxpayers are permitted
under the Code and applicable regulations to change to the tax year requested in the
Form 1128, or whether the change may be effected under Rev. Proc. 2006-45.
A copy of this letter must be attached to any income tax return to which it is relevant.
Alternatively, taxpayers filing their returns electronically may satisfy this requirement by
attaching a statement to their return that provides the date and control number of the
letter ruling.
PLR-126580-11 3
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayers requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the
Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent. Enclosed is a copy of
the letter ruling showing the deletions proposed to be made when it is disclosed under
§ 6110.
Sincerely,
William A. Jackson
Branch Chief, Branch 5
(Income Tax & Accounting)
Office of Chief Counsel
cc:
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2011, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.