Private Letter Ruling 1132029 Released August 12, 2011 Approved Transcribed from scan

PLR 1132029: IRS approved a state retirement system's governmental excess benefit arrangement

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2011, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2011
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The IRS ruled that a state retirement system's excess benefit arrangement qualified under section 415(m). The arrangement supplements benefits from a defined benefit plan when section 415(b) limits prevent the full benefit from being paid. Participation is automatic and mandatory, the arrangement is funded on a pay-as-you-go basis, and a separate trust holds employer contributions for excess benefits and administration. The IRS also ruled that benefits are included in a participant's gross income when paid or made available, and that income accruing to the arrangement is exempt under sections 115 and 415(m)(1). The ruling assumes that the underlying plan is a qualified governmental plan and that the state will not implement a statutory transfer of funds into the excess benefit arrangement.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Did the proposed state retirement system arrangement qualify as a governmental excess benefit arrangement, and how would its benefits and income be taxed?
  • Outcome: approved
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 83, 115, 401(a), 402(b), 414(d), 415(b), 415(m), 451(a), and 501(a); Treas. Reg. §§ 1.83-3(e), 1.402(b)-1(a)(1), 1.415(b)-1, and 1.451-1(a)

Full text (IRS public release)

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 201132029

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

COMMISSIONER
TAX EXEMPT AND MAY 1 8 2011
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION

Uniform Issue List: 415.12-00

TER RK B 1
J »

Attention:

Legend:

System A =

Plan X =

Excess Plan X

State N =

State Statute S

Dear

This is in response to correspondence dated December 29, 2006, as supplemented by
correspondence dated November 14, 2007, May 29, 2009, June 23, 2009, October 28,
2009, July 15, 2010, August 20, 2010, September 29, 2010, February 24, 2011, and
March 2, 2011, submitted on behalf of Plan X by its authorized representatives, in which
a letter ruling was requested concerning the applicability of section 415(m) of the Internal
Revenue Code (“Code”) to an excess benefit plan (“Excess Plan X”) and the tax
consequences related thereto.

The following facts and representations have been submitted under penalty of perjury in
support of the rulings requested:

System A is a contributory retirement system in State N which maintains Plan X, a
defined benefit retirement plan established for teachers and administrators of public
schools in State N. Plan X was established pursuant to State N statute. Your
authorized representatives have represented that Plan X is intended to be qualified
under section 401(a) of the Code and is a governmental plan as defined in section
414(d). All participating employers are school districts in State N. Plan X is
administered by the State N Teachers’ Retirement Board (Board).

Page 2 201132029

Plan X includes a mandatory employee contribution feature. Plan X also provides that
certain participants may elect to participate in an enhanced retirement benefit program
under which they make pre-tax contributions which are picked up by State N. In
addition, Plan X allows participants to make pre-tax elective contributions to Plan X to
buy years of service credit in Plan X for eligible prior service in other specified public
employment. The Service has previously ruled that these pre-tax contributions qualify
as contributions that are picked up by the employer under Code section 414(h)(2).
Under the provisions of Plan X, these purchases of years of service credit may also be
made by after-tax contributions, rollovers, or trustee-to-trustee transfers.

Your authorized representatives represented in correspondence dated September 29,
2010, that Plan X will be revised to clarify that an employer for purposes of participation
in Plan X is limited to entities which are State N, a political subdivision of State N, or an
agency or instrumentality of State N. This revision will also provide that no employer
which is not permitted to participate in a qualified governmental pension plan as defined
in Code section 401 (a) or 414(d) shall be permitted to participate in Plan X.

State N has enacted legislation which authorizes the Board to establish and maintain a
qualified governmental excess benefit arrangement within the meaning of section 415(m). In accordance with this legislation, Excess Plan X will be adopted and
implemented by State N, as a part of Plan X, effective January 1, 2007.

A separate trust fund for the segregation of the assets of Excess Plan X was
established. This trust fund, which is separate and apart from the retirement fund of
Plan X, was established solely for the purpose of holding employer contributions
intended to pay excess benefits to Plan X participants. The excess benefit trust fund
was designed as a grantor trust for state law and federal income tax purposes. The
trustees of this separate trust fund are the Board.

Article Ill of Excess Plan X provides that participation in Excess Plan X is automatic and
mandatory and will commence each plan year once a retired participant or beneficiary
has an excess benefit in that plan year. The Board will determine for each plan year
which retired participants and beneficiaries are required to participate in Excess Plan X.
Participation in Excess Plan X will cease for any portion of a plan year in which the
retirement income of a retired participant or beneficiary is not limited by section 415(b) or

if all benefit obligations under Plan X to the retired participant or beneficiary have been
satisfied.

Section 4.01 of Excess Plan X provides that a participant or beneficiary will receive a
benefit equal to the amount of retirement income that would have been payable to, or
with respect to, a participant by Plan X that could not be paid because of the application
of the limitations on his retirement income under Code section 415(b) (“excess benefit’).
An excess benefit under Excess Plan X will be paid only if and to the extent the
participant is receiving retirement benefits under Plan X. The form of the benefit paid to
a participant from Excess Plan X will be the same as otherwise selected by the
participant and payable under Plan X. The excess benefit to which a participant is
entitled under Excess Plan X will be paid commencing during or within the month in
which all monthly payments of retirement benefits under Plan X are paid, and the excess
benefits will then be paid from that month to the end of the plan year. Under no
circumstances will the participant be given any election to defer compensation under

201132029

Excess Plan X, either directly or indirectly. In addition, there will be no employee
contributions to Excess Plan X.

Page 3

Section 4.01 of Excess Plan X also provides that Excess Plan X will not pay benefits in
excess of the Code section 415(b) limit to Plan X participants who have elected to
participate in the enhanced retirement program described above or who have elected to
purchase service credit through picked-up employer contributions.

Excess Plan X is funded on a pay-as-you-go basis. The Board will determine the
amount necessary to pay the excess benefits under Excess Plan X for each plan year.
The required contribution will be the aggregate of the excess benefits payable to all
affected participants for such plan year and an amount determined by the Board to be a
necessary and reasonable expense of administering Excess Plan X. The amount so
determined will be deposited into the trust fund. Under no circumstances will the
contributions to fund the excess benefits under Excess Plan X be credited to the trust
established to fund Plan X. Excess Plan X will not accept contributions or transfers from
Plan X. Any contributions not used to pay the excess benefits for a current plan year,
together with any income accruing to the trust fund, will be used to pay the
administrative expenses of Excess Plan X for the plan year. Any contributions not so
used that remain after the payment of administration expenses will be used to fund
administrative expenses or excess benefits of participants in future plan years.

State Statute S currently provides for a transfer of funds from State N’s pension liability
fund to Excess Plan X. Your authorized representatives represent that the Board will
not implement this provision. Section 5.02(a) of Excess Plan X states that in no event
shall a transfer from the pension liabilities fund, as referenced in State Statute S, be
made to Excess Plan X. Rather, Excess Plan X will be funded on a pay-as-you-go basis
from the State appropriation prior to any deposit into Plan X. Your authorized
representatives also represent that System A will seek an amendment to State Statute S
which would delete the language regarding transfers from the pension liability fund and
add language consistent with the provisions of Excess Plan X.

Although Excess Plan X is a part of Plan X, no assets of Plan X will be used to pay any
benefits under Excess Plan X. Excess Plan X is intended to grant a participant no more
than a mere contractual right to payment of benefits under Excess Plan X. Employer

contributions made to provide benefits under Excess Plan X may not be commingled
with assets of Plan X.

Based upon the facts and representations stated above, the following rulings are
requested:

  1. Excess Plan X is a qualified governmental excess benefit arrangement within the
    meaning of section 415(m) of the Code.

  2. The benefits payable under Excess Plan X will be includible in gross income for the
    taxable year or years in which such benefits are paid or otherwise made available to a
    participant or a participant’s beneficiary in accordance with the terms of Excess Plan X.

  3. Income accruing to Excess Plan X is exempt from federal income tax under Code

sections 115 and 415(m)(1) as income derived from the exercise of an essential
governmental function.

201132029

Page 4

Pursuant to correspondence dated May 29, 2009, your authorized representatives
withdrew a fourth requested ruling.

Section 415(b) of the Code and section 1.415(b)-1 of the Income Tax Regulations
(“regulations”) set forth the limitations on annual benefits for participants in defined
benefit plans.

Section 1.415(b)-1(b)(1)(ii) of the regulations provides in part that the annual benefit
does not include the annual benefit attributable to either employee contributions or
rollover contributions (as described in sections 401(a)(31), 402(c)(1), 403(a)(4),
403(b)(8), 408(d)(3), and 457(e)(16)), determined pursuant to the rules of paragraph
(b)(2) of this section. This section further states that the treatment of transferred benefits
is determined under the rules of paragraph (b)(3) of this section.

Section 1.415(b)-1(b)(3)(ii) of the regulations addresses elective transfer of distributable
benefits and states in part that the annual benefit provided by the transferee defined
benefit plan does not include the annual benefit attributable to the amount transferred.

Section 415(m) of the Code sets forth the treatment of qualified governmental excess
benefit arrangements. Section 415(m)(1) provides, in part, that in determining whether a
governmental plan (as defined in section 414(d)) meets the requirements of section 415,
benefits provided under a qualified governmental excess benefit arrangement shall not
be taken into account.

Section 415(m)(3) of the Code defines such an arrangement as a portion of a
governmental plan which meets the following three requirements: (A) such portion is
maintained solely for the purpose of providing to participants in the plan that part of the
participant’s annual benefit otherwise payable under the terms of the plan that exceeds
the limitations on benefits imposed by section 415 (“excess benefits”); (B) under such
portion no election is provided at any time to the participant (directly or indirectly) to
defer compensation; and (C) excess benefits are not paid from a trust forming a part of
such governmental plan unless such trust is maintained solely for the purpose of
providing such benefits.

With respect to your first requested ruling, Excess Plan X was established and adopted
under State N legislation as a part of Plan X. It has been represented that Plan X is a
governmental plan as described in section 414(d) of the Code. It has also been
represented that the only purpose of Excess Plan X is to provide affected employees of
school districts in State N who participate in Plan X that portion of their benefits that
would otherwise be payable under the terms of Plan X except for the limitations on
benefits imposed by section 415(b) of the Code, as applicable to governmental plans.
The terms of Excess Plan X limit participation to participants in Plan X for whom benefits
would exceed the limits of section 415 of the Code. Therefore, we have determined that
Excess Plan X is a portion of a governmental plan which is maintained solely for the
purpose of providing to State N school district employees who participate in Plan X that
part of the participants’ benefits otherwise payable under the terms of Plan X that
exceed the section 415 limits, and, as such, meets the requirements of section
415(m)(3)(A).

201132029

Page 5

Your authorized representatives have stated that participation in Excess Plan X is
mandatory and automatic, and that there are no employee contributions to Excess Plan
X. Your representatives also assert that no direct or indirect election to defer
compensation is provided to any participant in Excess Plan X. Thus, we have
determined that no direct or indirect election is provided at any time to participants to

defer compensation, and, accordingly, the requirements of Code section 415(m)(3)(B)
are met.

Section 415(m)(3)(C) of the Code requires that the trust from which the excess benefits
are paid must not form a part of the governmental plan which contains the excess
benefit arrangement, unless such trust is maintained solely for the purpose of providing
such benefits. In this case, Excess Plan X is funded on a pay-as-you-go basis. A
separate trust fund for the segregation of the assets related to Excess Plan X was
established. This trust fund was established solely for the purpose of holding employer
contributions intended to pay excess benefits to affected Plan X participants.
Contributions to the trust fund consist only of the amounts required to pay the excess
benefits and administrative expenses for the plan year. Any contributions not used to
pay the excess benefits for a current plan year, together with any income accruing to the
trust fund, will be used to pay the administrative expenses of Excess Plan X for the plan
year. Any contributions not so used that remain after the payment of administration
expenses will be used to fund administrative expenses or benefits of participants in

future years. Therefore, we have determined that the requirements of section
415(m)(3)(C) are met.

Since Excess Plan X satisfies all of the requirements of section 415(m)(3) of the Code,
we conclude with respect to your first ruling request that Excess Plan X is a qualified

governmental excess benefit arrangement within the meaning of section 415(m) of the
Code.

With respect to the second requested ruling, section 415(m)(2) of the Code provides that
for purposes of this chapter, (A) the taxable year or years for which amounts in respect
of a qualified governmental excess benefit arrangement are includible in gross income
by a participant, and (B) the treatment of such amounts when so includible by the
participant, shall be determined as if such qualified governmental excess benefit
arrangement were treated as a plan for the deferral of compensation which is maintained
by a corporation not exempt from tax under this chapter and which does not meet the
requirements for qualification under section 401.

Ruling 1 has already determined that Excess Plan X meets the legal requirements of
section 415(m) of the Code for qualified governmental excess benefit arrangements.
Accordingly, the tax treatment of the amounts distributed under Excess Plan X to the
participants is determined as if such qualified governmental excess benefit arrangement
was treated as a plan for the deferral of compensation which is maintained by a
corporation not exempt from tax under this chapter and which does not meet the
requirements for qualification under section 401.

Section 83(a) of the Code provides that the excess (if any) of the fair market value of
property transferred in connection with the performance of services over the amount
paid (if any) for the property is includible in the gross income of the person who
performed the services for the first taxable year in which the property becomes
transferable or is not subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture.

Page 6 201132029

Section 1.83-3(e) of the Income Tax Regulations (regulations) provides that for purposes
of Code section 83, the term “property” includes real and personal property other than
money or an unfunded and unsecured promise to pay money or property in the future.
Property also includes a beneficial interest in assets (including money) transferred or set
aside from claims of the transferor’s creditors, for example, in a trust or escrow account.

Section 402(b) of the Code provides that contributions made by an employer to an
employee's trust that is not exempt from tax under section 501(a) are included in the
employee's gross income in accordance with section 83, except that the value of the
employee's interest in the trust will be substituted for the fair market value of the property
in applying section 83. Under section 1.402(b)-1(a)(1) of the regulations, an employer's
contributions to a nonexempt employee's trust are included as compensation in the
employee's gross income for the taxable year in which the contribution is made, but only

to the extent that the employee’s interest in such contribution is substantially vested, as
defined in the regulations under section 83.

Section 451(a) of the Code and section 1.451-1(a) of the regulations provide that an item
of gross income is includible in gross income for the taxable year in which actually or
constructively received by a taxpayer using the cash receipts and disbursements method
of accounting. Under section 1.451-2(a) of the regulations, income is constructively
received in the taxable year during which it is credited to a taxpayer's account, set apart,
or otherwise made available so that the taxpayer may draw on it at any time. However,
income is not constructively received if the taxpayer's control of its receipt is subject to
substantial limitations or restrictions.

Various revenue rulings have considered the tax consequences of nonqualified deferred
compensation arrangements. Rev. Rul. 60-31, Situations 1-3, 1960-1 C.B. 174, holds
that a mere promise to pay, not represented by notes or secured in any way, does not
constitute receipt of income within the meaning of the cash receipts and disbursements
method of accounting. See also Rev. Rul. 69-650, 1969-2 C.B. 106, and Rev. Rul. 69-
649, 1969-2 C.B. 106.

Under the economic benefit doctrine, an employee has currently includible income from
an economic or financial benefit received as compensation, though not in cash form.
Economic benefit applies when assets are unconditionally and irrevocably paid into a
fund or trust to be used for the employee's sole benefit. Sproull v. Commissioner, 16
T.C. 244 (1951), aff'd per curiam, 194 F.2d 541 (6th Cir. 1952), Rev. Rul. 60-31, Situation

  1. In Rev. Rul. 72-25, 1972-1 C.B. 127, and Rev. Rul. 68-99, 1968-1 C. B. 193, an
    employee does not receive income as a result of the employer's purchase of an
    insurance contract to provide a source of funds for deferred compensation because the
    insurance contract is the employer's asset, subject to claims of the employer's creditors.

Accordingly, with respect to the second ruling request, we conclude that the benefits
payable under Excess Plan X will be includible in gross income for the taxable year or
years in which such benefits are paid or otherwise made available to a participant or a
participant's beneficiary in accordance with the terms of Excess Plan X.

With respect to your third requested ruling, Code section 415(m)(1) provides that income
accruing to a governmental plan (or to a trust that is maintained solely for the purpose of
providing benefits under a qualified governmental excess benefit arrangement) in

201132029

Page 7

respect of a qualified governmental excess benefit arrangement will constitute income
derived from the exercise of an essential governmental function upon which such
governmental plan (or trust) will be exempt from tax under section 115. Ruling 1 has
already determined that Excess Plan X meets the legal requirements of section 415(m)
of the Code for qualified governmental excess benefit arrangements.

Accordingly, with respect to your third requested ruling, we conclude that income
accruing to Excess Plan X is exempt from federal income tax under Code sections 115

and 415(m)(1) as income derived from the exercise of an essential governmental
function.

No opinion is expressed as to the tax treatment of the transactions described herein

under the provisions of any other section of either the Code or regulations which may be
applicable thereto.

This ruling letter assumes that Plan X is and was a governmental plan as described in
section 414(d) of the Code, is and was qualified under section 401(a), and its related
trust is and was exempt from tax under section 501 (a) at all times relevant thereto.

This ruling letter is based on the assumption that the Board will not implement State
Statute S.

This ruling letter is based on the assumption that the revisions described in your
authorized representatives’ correspondence dated September 29, 2010, will be made.

This ruling letter is based on the assumption that the after-tax contributions, rollovers
and trustee-to-trustee transfers described above are excluded from the determination of
annual benefit within the meaning of section 1.415(b)-1(b)(1)(ii) of the regulations.

This letter is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the
Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

Pursuant to a power of attorney on file with this office, a copy of this ruling letter is being
sent to your authorized representatives. If you wish to inquire about this ruling, please

contact . Please address all
correspondence to SE:T:EP:RA:G71.

Sincerely,

Dred Lule

Ingrid Grinde, Manager
Employee Plans Technical Guidance and
Quality Assurance Group 1

Enclosures:
Deleted copy of letter ruling
Notice of Intention to Disclose

cc:

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2011, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.