PLR 1131017: IRS granted more time to make an election for Canadian RRSP accounts
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2011, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A U.S. resident with Canadian Registered Retirement Savings Plan accounts asked for more time to make the election that defers U.S. taxation on income accrued in those accounts. The taxpayer had relied on a firm for tax preparation and general advice, but the firm did not initially identify the special U.S. reporting and election requirements. The IRS found that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith and granted 60 days from the ruling date to make the election under Revenue Procedure 2002-23. The ruling did not determine whether the taxpayer was otherwise eligible and required continuing Form 8891 filings for affected accounts.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Whether the taxpayer could receive an extension of time to make the RRSP election under Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3.
- Outcome: Approved.
- Key authorities: Treas. Reg. §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3; U.S.-Canada Income Tax Convention, Article XVIII(7); Rev. Proc. 2002-23.
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 201131017 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 8/5/2011 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 9100.22-00, 9114.03-06
Person To Contact:
----------------------- ----------------------, ID No. -------------
--------------------------- Telephone Number:
----------------------------------- ---------------------
Refer Reply To:
------ CC:INTL
PLR-152153-10
Date: April 26, 2011
TY: ---------------
Legend
A = ------------------------
------------------------
Company 1 = ---------------------------------
------------------------------------------
-------------------------
-------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Firm 1 = ---------------------------------------------
Tax Years = --------------
Year 1 = -------
Year 2 = -------
Dear ----------------:
PLR-152153-10 2
This is in reply to a letter dated December 17, 2010, requesting an extension of time
under Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3 for A to elect the provisions of Rev. Proc. 2002-23,
2002-1 C.B. 744, for Tax Years.
The ruling contained in this letter is based upon information and representations
submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed
by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted
in support of the requested rulings, it is subject to verification on examination. The
information submitted for consideration is substantially as set forth below.
FACTS
A became a resident of the United States in Year 1. Before he became a resident, A
established nine Canadian Registered Retirement Savings Plan (RRSP) accounts with
Company 1.
A has no tax-related education, skills or training. He believed that RRSPs were
conceptually similar to section 401(k) plans in the United States in that any built-up gain
inside an RRSP would be taxed only upon distribution. A relied on Firm 1 to prepare his
tax returns and provide general tax advice. Firm 1 did not initially advise A that he
might have special U.S. filing, reporting, or payment obligations with respect to his
RRSP accounts.
In Year 2, A withdrew funds from one of his RRSP accounts and provided Firm 1 with
documentation from Company 1 reflecting this withdrawal. At this point, Firm 1 began
to research the U.S. reporting requirements for RRSPs and recommended to A and his
spouse that they report the withdrawal on their Year 2 Form 1040. Based on the advice
of Firm 1, A and his spouse fully reported the withdrawal on a Form 8891 attached to
their Year 2 Form 1040.
Until these issues arose in connection with the preparation of the Year 2 Form 1040,
Firm 1 was unaware of the need to make an election pursuant to Article XVIII(7) of the
United States – Canada Income Tax Convention to defer U.S. federal income taxation
on income accrued in an RRSP.
A states that the Internal Revenue Service has not communicated with him in any way
regarding his RRSP accounts.
RULING REQUESTED
A requests the consent of the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service for an
extension of time under Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3 to make an election for Tax Years
under Rev. Proc. 2002-23 to defer U.S. federal income taxation on income accrued in
his RRSP accounts.
PLR-152153-10 3
LAW AND ANALYSIS
Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner has discretion to grant a
taxpayer a reasonable extension of time, under the rules set forth in Treas. Reg. §
301.9100-3, to make a regulatory election under all subtitles of the Internal Revenue
Code, except subtitles E, G, H, and I.
Treas. Reg. § 301.9100 -1(b) provides that an election includes an application for relief
in respect of tax, and defines a regulatory election as an election whose due date is
prescribed by a regulation, a revenue ruling, revenue procedure, notice, or
announcement.
Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(a) provides that requests for relief subject to this section will
be granted when the taxpayer provides the evidence (including affidavits described in
Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(e)) to establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that
the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and the grant of relief will not prejudice
the interests of the Government.
In the present situation, the election provided in Rev. Proc. 2002-23 is a regulatory
election within the meaning of Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-1(b). Therefore, the
Commissioner has discretionary authority under Treas. Reg. § 301.9100–1(c) to grant A
an extension of time, provided that A satisfies the standards set forth in Treas. Reg. §
301.9100-3(a).
Based solely on the information submitted and representations made, we conclude that
A satisfies the standards of Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3. Accordingly, A is granted an
extension of time until 60 days from the date of this ruling letter to make an election for
Tax Years under Rev. Proc. 2002-23. As provided in Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-1(a), the
granting of an extension of time is not a determination that A is otherwise eligible to
make the above-described election.
Pursuant to section 4.07 of Rev. Proc. 2002-23, the election once made cannot be
revoked except with the consent of the Commissioner. For Tax Years, and all
subsequent tax years until the tax year in which a final distribution is made from each
RRSP account, A must file Form 8891 for each RRSP account for which the election is
made and from which a final distribution has not been made.
Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the
tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in
this letter.
PLR-152153-10 4
A copy of this letter must be attached to A’s and his spouse’s U.S. income tax return for
the year in which A obtained the ruling and should be associated with A’s and his
spouse’s amended returns for Tax Years.
This letter ruling is directed only to the taxpayers who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3)
provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
Pursuant to a power of attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter will be sent to
your authorized representative.
Sincerely,
M. Grace Fleeman
Senior Technical Reviewer, Branch 1
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(International)
Enclosure:
Copy for 6110 purposes
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2011, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.