PLR 1129044: IRS waived the 60-day rollover deadline after a retirement distribution was deposited into a non-IRA account

Plain-English summary

A taxpayer received a retirement-plan distribution that was intended for an IRA, but a financial advisor deposited it into a non-IRA account. The taxpayer later moved the remaining amount into an IRA and asked the IRS to waive the 60-day rollover deadline. The IRS found that the late rollover was caused by the financial advisor's error and granted the waiver under section 402(c)(3)(B). The taxpayer was given 60 days from the ruling date to contribute the remaining amount to a rollover IRA, subject to the other rollover requirements.

Ruling snapshot

• Question: Whether the IRS should waive the 60-day rollover requirement for the distribution from Plan X.
• Outcome: Approved.
• Key authorities: IRC §§ 402(c)(1), 402(c)(3), 402(c)(3)(A), 402(c)(3)(B), and 401(a); Rev. Proc. 2003-16.

Full text (IRS public release)

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION

APR 28 2011

Uniform Issue List: 402.00-00
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXK SE:T:EP:RA:T
XXXXXXXXXKXXXXKKX
XXXXXXXXXXXKXKKKK
Legend:
Taxpayer A = XXXXXXKXXXXX
Plan X = XXXXXXXXXXXX

XXXXXXXXXXXX
Financial Advisor B = XXXXXXXXXXXX

Financial Institution C = KXXKXKKKKKKMK

Account Y = XXXXXXXXXXKX
IRA X = XXXXXXXXXXXKX
XXXXXXXKXXKXKK

Financial Institution D = XXXXXXXXXXXX

Amount N = XXXXXXXXXXXKX
Amount O = XXXXXXXXXKXXKX
Date 1 = XXXXXXXXXXKK
Date 2 = XXXXXXXXXXKX
Date 3 = XXXXXXKXXXXKX

Date 4 = XXXKXXKXXXXXXXK

XXXXXXXXXXX
Page 2 of 4

Dear XXXXXXXX:

This is in response to your letter dated June 30, 2010, as supplemented by
correspondence dated September 20, 2010, January 28, 2011, and March 31,
2011, submitted on your behalf by your authorized representative, in which you
request a waiver of the 60-day rollover requirement contained in section
402(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”).

The following facts and representations have been submitted under penalties of
perjury in support of your ruling request.

On Date 1, Taxpayer A, age 60, received a distribution of Amount N from Plan X
which she intended to roll over into an IRA which had been established at
Financial Institution C. Taxpayer A asserts that, due to an error by Financial
Advisor B, Amount N was not rolled over timely into an IRA.

On Date 1, Plan X issued a check payable to Taxpayer A for Amount N. The
check for Amount N represented the lump sum payment minus 20 percent
federal withholding tax of the non-annuity portion of Taxpayer A’s retirement
benefit in Plan X. Plan X distributed Amount N to Taxpayer A pursuant to the
distribution method Taxpayer A had elected when she filed for retirement.

Prior to Date 1 but a few months after Taxpayer A had filed her retirement
papers, Taxpayer A met with Financial Advisor B of Financial Institution C who
advised Taxpayer A to rescind her election to have the non-annuity portion of
Plan X distributed to her, and to elect, instead, to have the non-annuity portion of
Plan X rolled over directly from Plan X into an IRA to be maintained at Financial
Institution C.

Taxpayer A contacted Plan X and filed paperwork to change her election of
distribution method to a direct rollover, however, because Plan X had already
begun to process Taxpayer A’s non-annuity payment in accordance with her
initial election, and in spite of efforts by both Taxpayer A and Financial Advisor B
to persuade Plan X to perform the direct rollover to Financial Institution C,
Taxpayer A received a check for Amount N on Date 1 as Plan X's final decision
on the matter.

Documentation shows that during a meeting between Financial Advisor B and
Taxpayer A, Financial Advisor B, in anticipation of the direct rollover from Plan X,
established an IRA at Financial Institution C on behalf of Taxpayer A. On Date 2,
the check for Amount N was presented to Financial Advisor B who deposited
Amount N into Account Y (a non-IRA account) at Financial Institution C, instead
of into the IRA which had been established months earlier to receive the direct
rollover from Plan X.

XXXXXXXXXXX
Page 3 of 4

Taxpayer A represents that at the time she presented the check from Plan X to
Financial Advisor B, he informed Taxpayer A that since taxes had been withheld
from the payment, it did not matter as to which type of account Amount N could
be deposited.

Taxpayer A asserts that she relied on Financial Advisor B and that she believed
that Amount N was tax-sheltered in Account Y. During Date 3 when Account Y
experienced significant losses, Taxpayer A transferred Amount O (the remainder
of Amount N) to an account maintained at Financial Institution D. On Date 4,
Financial Institution D placed Amount O into IRA X.

Based on the above facts and representations, you request a ruling that the
Internal Revenue Service waive the 60-day rollover requirement contained in
section 402(c)(3) of the Code with respect to the distribution of Amount N.

Section 402(c)(1) of the Code provides that if any portion of the balance to the
credit of an employee in a qualified trust is paid to the employee in an eligible
rollover distribution, and the distributee transfers any portion of the property
received in such distribution to an eligible retirement plan, and in the case of a
distribution of property other than money, the amount so transferred consists of
the property distributed, then such distribution (to the extent transferred) shall
not be includible in gross income for the taxable year in which paid. Section
402(c)(3)(A) states that such rollover must be accomplished within 60 days
following the day on which the distributee received the property. An individual
retirement account (IRA) constitutes one form of eligible retirement plan.

Section 402(c)(3)(B) of the Code provides, in relevant part, that the Secretary
may waive the 60-day requirement under section 402(c) where the failure to
waive such requirement would be against equity or good conscience, including
casualty, disaster, or other events beyond the reasonable control of the individual
subject to such requirement. Only distributions that occurred after December 31,
2001, are eligible for the waiver under section 402(c)(3)(B) of the Code.

Revenue Procedure 2003-16, 2003-4 I.R.B. 359, provides that in determining
whether to grant a waiver of the 60-day rollover requirement pursuant to section
402(c)(3)(B) of the Code, the Service will consider all relevant facts and
circumstances, including: (1) errors committed by a financial institution; (2)
inability to complete a rollover due to death, disability, hospitalization,
incarceration, restrictions imposed by a foreign country or postal error, (3) the
use of the amount distributed (for example, in the case of payment by check,
whether the check was cashed); and (4) the time elapsed since the distribution
occurred.

XXXXXXXXXXX
Page 4 of 4

The information presented and documentation submitted is consistent with your
assertion that Taxpayer A’s failure to accomplish a timely rollover of Amount N
into an IRA was caused by an error by Financial Advisor B.

Therefore, pursuant to section 402(c)(3)(B) of the Code, the Service hereby
waives the 60-day rollover requirement with respect to the distribution of Amount
N from Plan X. Taxpayer A is granted a period of 60 days from the issuance of
this ruling letter to contribute Amount N less Amount O into a rollover IRA.
Provided all other requirements of section 402(c)(3) of the Code, except the 60-
day requirement, are met, the contribution of Amount N will be considered a valid
rollover contribution within the meaning of section 402(c)(3) of the Code. In
addition, the contribution of Amount O into an IRA on Date 4 will be considered a
valid rollover contribution within the meaning of section 402(c)(3) of the Code.

This ruling assumes Plan X satisfied the qualification requirements of section
401(a) of the Code at all times relevant to this transaction.

No opinion is expressed as to the tax treatment of the transactions described
herein under the provisions of any other section of either the Code or regulations,
which may be applicable thereto.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer that requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of
the Code provides that it may not be used or cited by others as precedent.

A copy of this letter is being sent to your authorized representative pursuant to a
Power of Attorney on file in this office.

If you wish to inquire about this ruling, please contact XXXXXXXX, ID Number
XXXXXX, by telephone at (XXX) XXX-XXXX. Please address all correspondence
to SE:T:EP:RA:T.

Sincerely yours,

fe Laura B. Warshawsky, Manager

Employee Plans, Technical Group 3
Enclosures:
Deleted copy of letter ruling
Notice of Intention to Disclose