PLR 201129030: IRS grants more time for a section 754 election
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2011, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
An entity that began as a disregarded limited liability company later became a partnership and then underwent a technical termination under section 708(b)(1)(B). It inadvertently failed to make a section 754 election with the return for the year of the termination. The IRS concluded that the requirements for late-election relief were satisfied and granted 60 days from the ruling date to make the election for the specified year. The election must be made in a written statement filed with the applicable service center, with a copy of the ruling attached.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: May the entity make a late section 754 election after its technical termination?
- Outcome: approved
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 708, 734, 743, and 754; Treas. Reg. §§ 1.754-1 and 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 201129030
Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 7/22/2011
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Numbers: 754.00-00, 9100.15-00
Person To Contact:
------------------------------------------- -----------------, ID No. -----------------
-----------------------------
Telephone Number:
--------------------------------------
---------------------
------------------------------------------------- Refer Reply To:
CC:PSI:B01
PLR-146770-10
Date:
April 12, 2011
LEGEND
X = ----------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------
Y = ------------------------------
Date 1 = --------------------------
Date 2 = -----------------------
Date 3 = -----------------------
State = -------------
Dear ---------------:
This is in response to a letter dated --------------------------, submitted on behalf of X, requesting an extension of time under § 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations to file an election under § 754 of the Internal Revenue Code.
FACTS
According to the information submitted, X was formed as a limited liability company under the laws of State on Date 1. On formation X was wholly owned by Y and thus a disregarded entity for federal income tax purposes. On Date 2, X for the first time, had more than one member and thus became a partnership for federal income tax purposes. Due to subsequent transfers, X underwent a technical termination under
PLR-146770-10
2
section 708(b)(1)(B) on Date 3. However, X inadvertently failed to file a section 754 election with the return for its taxable year ending on Date 3.
X represents that it relied on its tax advisor for tax advice. X further represents that it has acted reasonably and in good faith, that granting relief will not prejudice the interests of the government, and that it is not using hindsight in making the election.
LAW AND ANALYSIS
Section 754 provides that a partnership may elect to adjust the basis of partnership property when there is a distribution of property or a transfer of a partnership interest. An election under § 754 applies with respect to all distributions of property by the partnership and to all transfers of interests in the partnership during the taxable year with respect to which the election was filed and all subsequent taxable years.
Section 1.754-1(b) of the Income Tax Regulations provides that an election under § 754 to adjust the basis of partnership property under §§ 734(b) and 743(b), with respect to a distribution of property to a partner or a transfer of an interest in a partnership, must be made in a written statement filed with the partnership return for the taxable year during which the distribution or transfer occurs. For the election to be valid, the return must be filed not later than the time prescribed by § 1.6031-1(e) (including extensions) for filing the return for such taxable year.
Under § 301.9100-1(c), the Commissioner may grant a reasonable extension of time to make a regulatory election, or a statutory election (but no more than six months except in the case of a taxpayer who is abroad), under all subtitles of the Internal Revenue Code, except subtitles E, G, H, and I. Section 301-9100-1(b) defines the term "regulatory election" as including an election whose due date is prescribed by a regulation published in the Federal Register.
Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 provide the standards that the Commissioner will use to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make an election. Section 301.9100-1(a). Section 301.9100-2 provides automatic extensions of time for making certain elections. Section 301.9100-3 provides rules for requesting extensions of time for regulatory elections that do not meet the requirements of § 301.9100-2.
Requests for relief under § 301.9100-3 will be granted when the taxpayer provides evidence to establish that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and that granting relief will not prejudice the interest of the government. Section 301-9100-3(a).
CONCLUSION
Based solely on the facts submitted and the representations made, we conclude that the requirements of §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 have been satisfied. As a result, X
PLR-146770-10
3
is granted an extension of time of sixty (60) days from the date of this letter to make a
§ 754 election for Year. The election should be made in a written statement filed with the applicable service center for association with X’s tax return. A copy of this letter should be attached to the statement filed.
Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in this letter.
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
Pursuant to the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is being sent to your authorized representatives.
Sincerely,
Curt G. Wilson
Deputy Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs & Special Industries)
David Haglund
By: _____
David Haglund, Branch Chief
Branch 1
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs & Special Industries)
Enclosures (2)
Copy of this letter
Copy for § 6110 purposes
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace