PLR 1129022: Taxpayer granted more time to elect prior-year disaster loss treatment

Plain-English summary

A married couple's rental properties were damaged by a federally declared disaster. Their accountant missed the deadline to elect to claim the disaster loss on the prior year's return, and the IRS disallowed the resulting refund claim. The IRS found that the taxpayers acted reasonably and in good faith and that relief would not prejudice the government. It granted 45 days from the ruling date to make the election and required the ruling or a statement with its date and control number to accompany the amended return.

Ruling snapshot

• Question: May the taxpayers receive more time to elect prior-year treatment for a federally declared disaster loss?
• Outcome: approved
• Key authorities: IRC § 165(i); Treas. Reg. §§ 1.165-11(e) and 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3; IRC § 6110

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201129022 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 7/22/2011 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 9100.00-00
Person To Contact:
-------------------------------------------------- ----------------, ID No. ----------
------------------------------------- Telephone Number:
---------------------------------------- ---------------------
Refer Reply To:
CC:ITA:B02
PLR-145068-10
Date:
April 15, 2011

              TY: ---------------------------------

Legend

Taxpayer = --------------------------------------------------

Date1 = -----------------------

Year1 = -------

Year2 = -------

Year3 = -------

Disaster = ------------------------

Accountant = --------------------

Date2 = ----------------

Date3 = -------------------

Date4 = --------------------------

Dear ---------------------------:

  This ruling letter is in response to your letter dated Date1. In your letter, you

requested an extension of time to make an election to report on your Year1 amended
income tax return a disaster loss sustained in Year2 pursuant to § 165(i) of the Internal
Revenue Code. The request is based on §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 of the
Procedure and Administration Regulations.

PLR-145068-10 2

                                     FACTS

  Taxpayer, a husband and wife, operate rental properties that were damaged in

Year2 as a result of Disaster. The President of the United States determined that the
damage caused by Disaster warranted assistance by the Federal Government under the
Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act. On Date2,
Taxpayer contacted Accountant to prepare an income tax return for Year2. At the time,
Taxpayer did not have complete information, such as loss verification reports from the
Small Business Administration Disaster Processing Unit, to file the income tax return for
Year2 and filed an extension for the Year2 income tax return.

  Accountant overlooked the deadline (Date3) to report Taxpayer’s loss from

Disaster on a Year1 amended tax return. Accountant mistakenly believed that an
exception to the deadline to elect to report a casualty loss attributable to a federally
declared disaster in the immediately preceding year applied for losses resulting from
Disaster, and applied the exception to Taxpayer’s loss from Disaster. As a result,
Taxpayer’s amended income tax return for Year1 and original income tax return for
Year2 were filed on Date4. Taxpayer claimed the Year2 casualty loss on the Year1
amended tax return to ease some of the financial obligations associated with restoring the
damaged properties.

   Taxpayer received a notice from the Internal Revenue Service disallowing the

claim for refund for the Year1 amended tax return because it was received after the
Date3 deadline for making an election to claim a Year2 casualty loss for Disaster on a
Year1 income tax return. The taxpayer then asked the Appeals Office of the Internal
Revenue Service for reconsideration of the claim disallowance and the Appeals Office
denied the claim.

                                       LAW

  Section 165(a) allows a deduction for any loss sustained during the taxable year

and not compensated for by insurance or otherwise.

   Section 165(i) provides that a taxpayer may elect to take into account any loss

occurring in a disaster area and attributable to a federally declared disaster in the
taxable year immediately preceding the taxable year in which the disaster occurred.

   Section 1.165-11(e) of the Income Tax Regulations provides that the election to

claim a deduction with respect to a disaster loss must be made on or before the later of
(1) the due date for filing the income tax return (determined without regard to any
extension of time granted the taxpayer for filing such return) for the taxable year in
which the disaster actually occurred, or (2) the due date for filing the income tax return
(determined with regard to any extension of time granted the taxpayer for filing such

PLR-145068-10 3

return) for the taxable year immediately preceding the taxable year in which the disaster
actually occurred.

   Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 provide the standards the

Commissioner uses to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make a
regulatory election. Section 301.9100-2 provides automatic extensions of time for
making certain elections. Section 301.9100-3 provides extensions of time to make a
regulatory election for requests that do not meet the requirements of § 301.9100-2.
Section 301.9100-1(b) defines the term “regulatory election” as an election whose due
date is prescribed by a regulation published in the Federal Register, or a revenue ruling,
procedure, notice, or announcement published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin.

    Section 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner may grant a reasonable

extension of time to make a regulatory election, or a statutory election (but no more than
6 months except in the case of a taxpayer who is abroad) under all subtitles of the
Internal Revenue Code except subtitles E, G, H and I. Requests for extensions of time
for regulatory elections will be granted when the taxpayer provides evidence (including
affidavits described in the regulations) to establish to the satisfaction of the
Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith and the grant of
relief will not prejudice the interests of the government. Section 301.9100-3(a).

    Section 301.9100-3(b)(1) provides that a taxpayer is deemed to have acted

reasonably and in good faith if the taxpayer: (i) requests relief before the failure to make
the regulatory election is discovered by the Service; (ii) failed to make the election
because of intervening events beyond the taxpayer’s control; (iii) failed to make the
election because, after exercising reasonable diligence, the taxpayer was unaware of the
necessity for the election; (iv) reasonably relied on the written advice of the Service; or
(v) reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional, including a tax professional
employed by the taxpayer, and the tax professional failed to make, or advise the
taxpayer to make, the election.

   Section 301.9100-3(b)(3) provides that a taxpayer is deemed not to have acted

reasonably and in good faith if the taxpayer: (i) seeks to alter a return position for which
an accuracy-related penalty was or could be imposed under § 6662 at the time the
taxpayer requests relief and the new position requires or permits a regulatory election
for which relief is requested; (ii) was informed in all material respects of the required
election and related tax consequences and chose not to file the election; or (iii) uses
hindsight in requesting relief.

   Section 301.9100-3(c)(1)(i) provides, in part, that the interests of the government

are prejudiced if granting relief would result in the taxpayer having a lower tax liability in
the aggregate for all taxable years affected by the election than the taxpayer would
have had if the election had been timely made (taking into account the time value of
money). Section 301.9100-3(c)(1)(ii) provides, in part, that the interests of the
PLR-145068-10 4

government are ordinarily prejudiced if the taxable year in which the regulatory election
should have been made, or any taxable years that would have been affected by the
election had it been timely made, are closed by the period of limitations on assessment
under § 6501(a) before the taxpayer’s receipt of a ruling granting relief under this
section.

                                   CONCLUSION

  Taxpayer’s election is a regulatory election as defined under § 301.9100-1(b)

because the due date of the election is prescribed in § 1.165-11(e). Therefore,
Taxpayer’s request is analyzed under the requirements of § 301.9100-3.

    Taxpayer provided information and representations to establish that Taxpayer

satisfies the requirements of § 301.9100-3. The information and representations made
by Taxpayer and Accountant establish that Taxpayer acted reasonably and in good
faith. These representations include: (a) Taxpayer is not seeking to alter a return
position for which an accuracy-related penalty has been or could be imposed under
§ 6662 at the time of the request for relief and (b) Taxpayer is not using hindsight in
requesting relief and none of the specific facts have changed since the due date for
making the election that make the election advantageous.

     Furthermore, granting an extension will not prejudice the interests of the

Government. Taxpayer represented that granting relief would not result in a lower tax
liability in the aggregate for all taxable years affected by the election than Taxpayer
would have had if the election had been timely made (taking into account the time value
of money). Also, the taxable year in which the regulatory election should have been
made is not closed by the period of limitations on assessment.

   Accordingly, Taxpayer is granted an extension of time to make the election

available under § 1.165-11 for the Year1 disaster loss. The extension of time shall be
for a period of 45 days from the date of this ruling.

   This ruling is limited to the making of the described election. Except as expressly

provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the tax consequences of
the subject loss transaction under the provisions of any other sections of the Code or
regulations that may be applicable hereto.

  This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3)

provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

     In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this

letter is being sent to your authorized representative.

PLR-145068-10 5

   A copy of this letter must be attached to the amended tax return for the taxable

year in which the described disaster loss will be taken into account. Alternatively,
taxpayers filing their returns electronically may satisfy this requirement by attaching a
statement to their return that provides the date and control number of the letter ruling.

   The ruling contained in this letter is based upon information and representations

submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed
by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted
in support of the request for a ruling, it is subject to verification on examination.

                                  Sincerely,



                                  Norma C. Rotunno
                                  Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 2
                                  Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
                                  (Income Tax & Accounting)