Private Letter Ruling 1126041 Released July 1, 2011 Denied Transcribed from scan

PLR 1126041: IRS declines to waive the 60-day IRA rollover requirement

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2011, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2011
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A taxpayer received distributions from two IRAs and placed the funds into non-IRA certificates of deposit after relying on instructions from a financial institution representative. The taxpayer asked the IRS to waive the 60-day rollover requirement. The IRS declined because the submitted facts did not show that the taxpayer was prevented from completing a timely rollover, and the representative's instruction to deposit the funds within five days did not amount to the type of error warranting relief. The amounts therefore were not eligible for rollover treatment and had to be included in gross income for the applicable tax year.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Whether the IRS should waive the 60-day IRA rollover requirement under IRC § 408(d)(3)(I).
  • Outcome: Denied.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 408(d)(1), 408(d)(3), and 6110; Rev. Proc. 2003-16.

Full text (IRS public release)

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 201126041

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

EXEMPT
DIVISION

Uniform Issue List: 408.03-00

Legend:

Taxpayer A

IRA B

IRA C

Financial Institution D
Financial Institution E
Financial Institution F
Amount 1

Amount 2

Dear:

This letter is in response to a request for a letter ruling dated April 5, 2010, as
supplemented by additional correspondence dated September 16, and October 28,
2010, from your authorized representative, in which you request, a waiver of the 60-day
rollover requirement contained in section 408(d)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code
("Code").

The following facts and representations have been submitted under penalty of perjury in
support of the ruling requested:

Taxpayer A, age 57, represents that she received a distribution from IRA B and IRA C
totaling Amount 1 and Amount 2, respectively. Taxpayer A, asserts that her failure to
accomplish a rollover within the 60-day period prescribed by section 408(d)(3) of the
Code was due to her reliance on instructions given to her by a representative of
Financial Institution D (where IRA B resided) which resulted in the funds being placed in

201126041

non-IRA accounts. Taxpayer A further represents that Amount 1 and Amount 2 have
not been used for any other purpose.

Taxpayer A maintained IRA B and IRA C, individual retirement accounts, under section
408(a) of the Code with Financial Institutions D and E respectively. Documentation
submitted indicates that in early 2009 Taxpayer A discussed, with a representative of
Financial Institution D (where IRA B resided), moving IRA B to another financial institution
because of the high fees at Financial Institution D. The representative at Financial
Institution D had been Taxpayer A’s advisor since 2003 and Taxpayer A always relied on
the advice provided by the representative. The representative instructed Taxpayer A not
to spend any of the funds but place the funds in a certificate of deposit at a bank within 5
days of receiving the funds so she would not incur any taxes or penalties.

Following Financial Institution D's representative's instructions, Taxpayer A withdrew
Amount 1 from IRA B on March 4, 2009, and deposited it into a certificate of deposit at
Financial Institution F on March 10, 2009. In addition, using the same instructions,
Taxpayer A withdrew Amount 2 from IRA C on May 23, 2009, and deposited it into a
certificate of deposit at Financial Institution F on May 29, 2009, to consolidate her
investments at one place. However, the certificates of deposits at that Taxpayer A
established at Financial Institution F were non-IRA accounts. Taxpayer A’s error was
discovered by her tax preparer while preparing her 20 _ tax return

Based on the above facts and representations, you request that the Internal Revenue
Service (“Service”) waive the 60-day rollover requirement contained in section 408(d)(3)
of the Code with respect to the distribution of Amount 1 and Amount 2.

Section 408(d)(1) of the Code provides that, except as otherwise provided in section
408(d) of the Code, any amount paid or distributed out of an IRA shall be included in
gross income by the payee or distributee, as the case may be, in the manner provided
under section 72 of the Code.

Section 408(d)(3) of the Code provides the rules applicable to IRA rollovers.

Section 408(d)(3)(A) of the Code provides that section 408(d)(1) of the Code does not
apply to any amount paid or distributed out of an IRA to the individual for whose benefit
the IRA is maintained if -

(i) the entire amount received (including money and any other property) is paid
into an IRA for the benefit of such individual not later than the 60th day after the day on
which the individual receives the payment or distribution; or

(ii) the entire amount received (including money and any other property) is paid
into an eligible retirement plan (other than an IRA) for the benefit of such individual not
later than the 60th day after the date on which the payment or distribution is received,

201126041

except that the maximum amount which may be paid into such plan may not exceed the
portion of the amount received which is includible in gross income (determined without
regard to section 408(d)(3) of the Code).

Section 408(d)(3)(B) of the Code provides that section 408(d)(3) of the Code does not
apply to any amount described in section 408(d)(3)(A)(i) of the Code received by an
individual from an IRA if at any time during the 1-year period ending on the day of such
receipt such individual received any other amount described in section 408(d)(3)(A)(i) of
the Code from an IRA which was not includible in gross income because of the
application of section 408(d)(3) of the Code.

Section 408(d)(3)(D) of the Code provides a similar 60-day rollover period for partial
rollovers.

Section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code provides that the Secretary may waive the 60-day
requirement under sections 408(d)(3)(A) and 408(d)(3)(D) of the Code where the failure
to waive such requirement would be against equity or good conscience, including
casualty, disaster, or other events beyond the reasonable control of the individual
subject to such requirement. Only distributions that occurred after December 31, 2001,
are eligible for the waiver under section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code.

Rev. Proc. 2003-16, 2003-4 I.R.B. 359 (January 27, 2003) provides that in determining
whether to grant a waiver of the 60-day rollover requirement pursuant to section
408(d)(3)(I) of the Code, the Service will consider all relevant facts and circumstances,
including: (1) errors committed by a financial institution; (2) inability to complete a
rollover due to death, disability, hospitalization, incarceration, restrictions imposed by a
foreign country or postal error; (3) the use of the amount distributed (for example, in the
case of payment by check, whether the check was cashed); and (4) the time elapsed
since the distribution occurred.

The facts and representations submitted for this ruling request do not demonstrate how
Taxpayer A was prevented from completing the timely rollover of her IRAs to an eligible
retirement plan such as an IRA.

You have not presented any evidence to the Service as to how any of the factors
outlined in Rev. Proc. 2003-16 affected your inability to timely roll over Amounts 1 and 2
or any portion thereof, to an IRA. We do not believe that the advice given to Taxpayer -
A by Financial Institution D’s representative rises to the level of financial advisor error.
Financial Institution D’s representative told Taxpayer A to deposit the funds in a CD
within 5 days, which is well within the 60-day rollover period window. Taxpayer A knew
the funds were being distributed from IRAs and since it was her stated purpose to move
her IRAs, it is reasonable to assume that Taxpayer A should have known that the funds
had to be deposited into another IRA. The information submitted by you demonstrates
that you are solely responsible for failing to timely deposit Amounts 1 and 2 into an IRA.

201126041

Therefore, pursuant to section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code, the Service declines to waive
the 60-day rollover requirement with respect to Amounts 1 and Amount 2. Amounts 1
and Amount 2 are not eligible to be treated as rollover contributions within the meaning
of section 408(d)(3) and must be included in Taxpayer A's gross income for the 20
taxable year.

No opinion is expressed as to the tax treatment of the transaction described herein
under the provisions of any other section of either the Code or regulations that may be
applicable thereto.

This letter is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k){3) of the
Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

| If you wish to inquire about this ruling, please contact
| at
|

Sincerely yours,

Carlton A. Watkins

Carlton A. Watkins, Manager
Employee Plans Technical Group 1

Enclosures:
Deleted Copy of this Letter
Notice of Intention to Disclose, Notice 437

cc:

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2011, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.