Private Letter Ruling 1126018 Released July 1, 2011 Approved

PLR 1126018: Extension granted for a Canadian RRSP tax deferral election

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2011, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2011
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The IRS granted a U.S. resident and citizen more time to elect under Rev. Proc. 2002-23 to defer U.S. federal income taxation on income accrued in Canadian Registered Retirement Savings Plans. The taxpayer had been told that no special filing requirements applied and later discovered the election requirement while preparing a return. The IRS gave the taxpayer 60 days from the ruling letter date to make the election for the redacted tax years. The ruling did not determine whether the taxpayer was otherwise eligible and required Forms 8891 for affected RRSPs and later years.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Whether a taxpayer could make a late election to defer U.S. tax on Canadian RRSP income under the U.S.-Canada treaty procedure.
  • Outcome: Approved, with 60 days to make the election.
  • Key authorities: Treas. Reg. §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3; Rev. Proc. 2002-23; United States-Canada Income Tax Convention, Article XVIII(7).

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201126018 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 7/1/2011 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Person To Contact:
Index Number: 9100.22-00, 9114.03-06 ----------------------, ID No. -------------
Telephone Number:
---------------------
------------------------------------ Refer Reply To:
------------- CC:INTL
------------- PLR-143523-10
---------------------- Date:
------------------------------- March 24, 2011

TY: --------------

Legend

A = --------------------------------------


Company 1 = -------------------------------


Company 2 = ----------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Tax Years = ---------------

Year 1 = -------

Year 2 = -------

Year 3 = -------

Dear -----------------:

This is in reply to a letter dated October 15, 2010, requesting an extension of time under
Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3 for A to elect the provisions of Rev. Proc. 2002-23, 2002-1
C.B. 744, for Tax Years.

PLR-143523-10 2

The ruling contained in this letter is based upon information and representations
submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed
by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted
in support of the requested rulings, it is subject to verification on examination. The
information submitted for consideration is substantially as set forth below.

FACTS

A became a resident of the United States in Year 1 and a citizen of the United States in
Year 2. Prior to Year 1, A was a resident of Canada. While a resident of Canada, A
established two Canadian Registered Retirement Savings Plans (RRSPs), one with
Company 1 and the other with Company 2.

After becoming a U.S. resident in Year 1, A and her husband were advised by one of
their tax return preparers that there were no special or separate filing requirements
relating to A’s RRSPs. A and her husband were required to move and relocate a
number of times in connection with her husband’s employment. As a consequence,
their tax returns for Tax Years were prepared by or with the assistance of a number of
different return preparers. It was not until A’s husband began preparing their Year 3
return using a tax preparation software program that he discovered that an election was
required to defer U.S. taxation on income accrued in A’s RRSPs pursuant to Article
XVIII(7) of the United States – Canada Income Tax Convention (Convention).

As of the date of this ruling request, the Internal Revenue Service has not
communicated with A in any way regarding her RRSPs.

RULING REQUESTED

A requests the consent of the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service for an
extension of time under Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3 to make an election for Tax Years
under Rev. Proc. 2002-23 to defer U.S. federal income taxation on income accrued in
her RRSPs.

LAW AND ANALYSIS

Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner has discretion to grant a
taxpayer a reasonable extension of time, under the rules set forth in Treas. Reg. §
301.9100-3, to make a regulatory election under all subtitles of the Internal Revenue
Code, except subtitles E, G, H, and I.

Treas. Reg. § 301.9100 -1(b) provides that an election includes an application for relief
in respect of tax, and defines a regulatory election as an election whose due date is
prescribed by a regulation, a revenue ruling, revenue procedure, notice, or
announcement.

PLR-143523-10 3

Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(a) provides that requests for relief subject to this section will
be granted when the taxpayer provides the evidence (including affidavits described in
Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(e)) to establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the
taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and the grant of relief will not prejudice
the interests of the Government.

In the present situation, the election provided in Rev. Proc. 2002-23 is a regulatory
election within the meaning of Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-1(b). Therefore, the
Commissioner has discretionary authority under Treas. Reg. § 301.9100–1(c) to grant A
an extension of time, provided that A satisfies the standards set forth in Treas. Reg. §
301.9100-3(a).

Based solely on the information submitted and representations made, we conclude that
A satisfies the standards of Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3. Accordingly, A is granted an
extension of time until 60 days from the date of this ruling letter to make an election for
Tax Years under Rev. Proc. 2002-23. As provided in Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-1(a), the
granting of an extension of time is not a determination that A is otherwise eligible to
make the above-described election.

Pursuant to section 4.07 of Rev. Proc. 2002-23, the election once made cannot be
revoked except with the consent of the Commissioner. For 2004, and all subsequent
tax years until the tax year in which a final distribution is made from each RRSP, A must
file Form 8891 for each RRSP for which the election is made and from which a final
distribution has not been made.

Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the
tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in
this letter.

A copy of this letter must be attached to A's U.S. income tax return for the year in which
A obtained the ruling and should be associated with A’s amended returns for Tax Years.

This letter ruling is directed only to the taxpayers who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3)
provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

PLR-143523-10 4

Pursuant to a power of attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter will be sent to
your authorized representatives.

                                            Sincerely,

                                            M. Grace Fleeman
                                            Senior Technical Reviewer, Branch 1
                                            Office of Associate Chief Counsel
                                            (International)

Enclosure:
Copy for 6110 purposes

CC: ----------------------------------


    -------------------------------------

    -----------------
    -------------------------

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2011, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.