CCA 201125034: Equitable recoupment requires a timely claim to offset

Number
201125034
Outcome
Advice
Document type
Chief Counsel Advice
IRS subject
Correction of Error
Topics
Code sections
§ 1311
Ruling dated
May 31, 2011
Publicly released
June 24, 2011

Apply this to your situation

This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2011, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2011
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It is advice from the IRS Office of Chief Counsel to IRS personnel on the facts they presented, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Chief Counsel considered a situation in which a taxpayer had paid a tax liability twice but did not discover the overpayment until the refund statute had closed. The advice states that equitable recoupment is a defense to a timely claim, such as when the IRS seeks to collect a sufficiently related tax. Without a timely claim to offset, however, the advice sees no way for the doctrine to apply.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Can equitable recoupment apply after the refund statute has closed and there is no timely claim to offset?
  • Outcome: Advice given, with no application of the doctrine identified on the presented facts.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 1311; equitable recoupment.

Full text (IRS public release)

ID: CCA_2011053108465247 Number: 201125034
Release Date: 6/24/2011
Office: -------------
UILC: 1311.00-00

From: ---------------------
Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2011 8:47:00 AM
To: --------------------
Cc:
Subject: Equitable recoupment

----------
I received the voicemail message you left on Friday. It sounds like you have a case where the taxpayer paid a tax liability twice but didn't realize it until the refund statute had closed. Equitable recoupment is a defense to a timely claim. For instance, if the Service were trying to collect a tax sufficiently related to the paid tax, then the taxpayer could argue equitable recoupment. But without a timely claim to offset, I don't see any way for the doctrine to apply.

Let me know if you need something further,


-------------------

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace