Chief Counsel Advice 1125034 Released June 24, 2011 Advice

CCA 1125034: Equitable recoupment requires a timely claim to offset

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2011, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2011
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Chief Counsel considered a situation in which a taxpayer had paid a tax liability twice but did not discover the overpayment until the refund statute had closed. The advice states that equitable recoupment is a defense to a timely claim, such as when the IRS seeks to collect a sufficiently related tax. Without a timely claim to offset, however, the advice sees no way for the doctrine to apply.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Can equitable recoupment apply after the refund statute has closed and there is no timely claim to offset?
  • Outcome: Advice given, with no application of the doctrine identified on the presented facts.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 1311; equitable recoupment.

Full text (IRS public release)

ID: CCA_2011053108465247 Number: 201125034
Release Date: 6/24/2011
Office: -------------
UILC: 1311.00-00

From: ---------------------
Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2011 8:47:00 AM
To: --------------------
Cc:
Subject: Equitable recoupment


I received the voicemail message you left on Friday. It sounds like you have a case where the taxpayer
paid a tax liability twice but didn't realize it until the refund statute had closed. Equitable recoupment is a
defense to a timely claim. For instance, if the Service were trying to collect a tax sufficiently related to the
paid tax, then the taxpayer could argue equitable recoupment. But without a timely claim to offset, I don't
see any way for the doctrine to apply.

Let me know if you need something further,

---- -------------

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2011, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.