Chief Counsel Advice 1125031 Released June 24, 2011 Advice

CCA 1125031: An untimely AAR could not support a partnership loss carryforward

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2011, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2011
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Chief Counsel Advice considered a corporate partner's loss carryforward that came from an untimely administrative adjustment request, rather than from an original Schedule K-1. The advice stated that the untimely request was a nullity. Because the corporate partner's return was inconsistent with the original Schedule K-1, the IRS could directly assess the inconsistently reported item under IRC § 6222 if the assessment period remained open. On the stated facts, the relevant assessment periods had expired for the amount at issue.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the IRS directly assess a partnership item reported inconsistently with the original Schedule K-1 when the adjustment request supporting the reported loss was untimely?
  • Outcome: Advice given.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 6222.

Full text (IRS public release)

ID: CCA_2011052610394337 Number: 201125031
Release Date: 6/24/2011
Office: ---------
UILC: 6222.00-00

From: --------------------
Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2011 10:39:48 AM
To: --------------------
Cc: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: ------------- AARs

If I understand your facts correctly, the corporate partner reported a $------------loss carryforward on its
originally filed ------- Form 1120. That loss carryforward derived from an untimely ------- AAR and not from
a ------- original Schedule K-1. Since the ------- AAR was untimely, it was a nullity. Because the corporate
partner filed inconsistently with the ------- original Schedule K-1 we can directly assess the inconsistently
reported item under section 6222. But we can only do so if the period for assessment is open for -------.
Under your facts it appears that all relevant periods for assessment have expired as to the $-----------.

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2011, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.