Chief Counsel Advice 1125028 Released June 24, 2011 Advice

CCA 1125028: Recovery of erroneous partnership refunds after an FPAA period expired

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2011, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2011
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Chief Counsel Advice addressed procedures for recovering erroneous refunds issued to partners when periods under IRC §§ 6229 or 6501 had expired. The advice stated that, if the IRS could still timely issue a final partnership administrative adjustment, it could assess and collect the erroneous amounts through that process. If the period for issuing the adjustment had expired, the IRS would instead need to bring an individual refund action against each partner under IRC §§ 7405 and 6532(b). The advice also stated that a timely administrative adjustment request petition by the tax matters partner would not suspend the collection period, although the suit could determine the correct partnership items for the partner-level refund actions.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: How could the IRS recover erroneous refunds issued to partners after the period for issuing an FPAA had expired?
  • Outcome: Advice given.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 7405 and 6532(b), with periods under §§ 6229 and 6501 discussed.

Full text (IRS public release)

ID: CCA_2011052309490137 Number: 201125028
Release Date: 6/24/2011
Office: ---------
UILC: 7405.00-00

From: --------------------
Sent: Monday, May 23, 2011 9:49:13 AM
To: --------------------
Cc: ------------
Subject: RE: Erroneous Refund Procedures for AARs with Expired 6229 or 6501

  1. If erroneous refunds are issued to partners, we can issue a timely FPAA to assess and collect these
    amounts.

  2. If the period for issuing an FPAA has expired, we would have to initiate individual refund actions
    against each separate partner under section 7405 and 6532(b).

  3. The filing of a timely AAR petition by the TMP would not suspend the period for collecting the
    erroneous refunds, but the AAR suit may determine the correct amount of partnership items on the merits
    for purposes of the concurrent partner-level erroneous refund suits.

  4. Whether erroneous refund suits should be handled by a single IRS counsel office will need to be
    determined on a case by case basis by the responsible area counsel.

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2011, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.