Chief Counsel Advice 1125027 Released June 24, 2011 Advice

CCA 1125027: Full partner TINs were not required on TEFRA notices

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2011, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2011
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Chief Counsel Advice considered whether full taxpayer identification numbers were required on notices of partnership administrative proceedings, final partnership administrative adjustments, and other TEFRA documents. It stated that IRC § 6223(c) and the related regulations required the partner's name and address for purposes of the TEFRA subchapter, but did not require a full TIN except when a partner provided updated information to the IRS. The advice therefore concluded that the IRS could balance privacy and practical necessity when deciding whether to include TINs. Outside the TEFRA examination function, IRC § 6103(e)(10) limited disclosure of one partner's personal identity information to another person.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Were full partner TINs legally required on NBAPs, FPAAs, and other TEFRA documents?
  • Outcome: Advice given.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 6223(c) and 6103(e)(10).

Full text (IRS public release)

ID: CCA_2011052012193637 Number: 201125027
Release Date: 6/24/2011
Office: ---------
UILC: 6223.02-00

From: --------------------
Sent: Friday, May 20, 2011 12:19:42 PM
To: --------------------
Cc: ------------
Subject: RE: AWR-137 Revised Form 872-P (Rev. 4-2011)

Section 6223(c) and the regulations there under only require, "for purposes of this subchapter", the use
of the name and address of a partner. The partner's TIN is not required except when the partner is
providing updated partner information to the Service. Thus, there is no legal requirement to have the full
TIN of partners on NBAPs and FPAAs or other TEFRA related documents. Thus, the Service is free to
balance privacy and practical necessity in determining whether to include TIN's. Note, however, that,
outside of the TEFRA examination function, section 6103(e)(10) limits disclosure of one partner's
personal identity information to any other person.

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2011, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.