Ezel / IRS Rulings / 1125020
Chief Counsel Advice 1125020 Released June 24, 2011 Advice

CCA 1125020: The cited election-extension regulations did not apply

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2011, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2011
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Chief Counsel Advice addressed whether regulations under § 301.9100 could extend the time for an election. It stated that § 301.9100-2 can extend statutory and regulatory elections when it applies, but it did not apply to the case described. It also stated that § 301.9100-3 can extend only regulatory elections and did not appear to apply either.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could §§ 301.9100-2 or 301.9100-3 extend the time for the election at issue?
  • Outcome: Advice given.
  • Key authorities: Treas. Reg. §§ 301.9100-2 and 301.9100-3.

Full text (IRS public release)

ID: CCA_2011051310010826 Number: 201125020
Release Date: 6/24/2011
Office: -------------
UILC: 9100.00-00

From: --------------------
Sent: Friday, May 13, 2011 10:01:12 AM
To: ------------------------
Cc:
Subject: RE: A different question

I'm not sure I'm understanding your question, but I may have misspoke before. Sec. 301.9100-2
can be used to extend statutory and regulatory elections when it applies, which it doesn't in your
case. Sec. 301.9100-3 can be used to extend only regulatory elections, so I don't think it applies
either.

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2011, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.