CCA 1124019: Summonses for cable subscriber payment records
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2011, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Chief Counsel Advice addressed whether an IRS summons for cable subscriber billing, payment, and account records sought personally identifiable information protected by the Cable Communications Policy Act. It concluded that the records were protected information, but that the IRS could obtain records showing the source of payment for internet or telephone services under an exception in the Stored Communications Act. The advice did not authorize disclosure of cable subscriber video-selection records. It also concluded that the existing summons covered the relevant payment information for the associated accounts.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Could the IRS use an administrative summons to obtain cable subscriber payment-source records despite privacy restrictions?
- Outcome: Advice given.
- Key authorities: 47 U.S.C. § 551; 18 U.S.C. § 2703(c)(2)(F); IRC § 7602.
Full text (IRS public release)
Office of Chief Counsel
Internal Revenue Service
Memorandum
Number: 201124019
Release Date: 6/17/2011
CC:PA:BR7
POSTN-151993-10
UILC: 7602.03-00
date: December 30, 2010
to: Steven M. Webster, Attorney
Greensboro CC:SB:2:GBO
from: Charles B. Christopher, Chief, Br. 7
CC:PA:Br7
subject: Cable Communications Policy Act and Collection Summonses
This Chief Counsel Advice responds to your request for assistance. This advice may
not be used or cited as precedent.
LEGEND
Taxpayer: ---------------------------
Cable Company: --------------------------
ISSUES
1. Does the description of records set forth in the summons served on the Cable
Company request the production of personally identifiable information within the
meaning of the Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984 (CCPA), 47 U.S.C. §§ 551 et
seq., when the description lists copies of the Taxpayer’s billing and account statements,
copies of his records of payment by check or direct account debit, and copies of his
service application and deposit record.
2. Does the exception codified in 18 U.S.C. § 2703(c)(2) of the Stored Wire and
Electronic Communications and Transactional Records Access statute permit the
Service to obtain any of the summoned information if the Cable Company provides
internet or telephone service to the Taxpayer.
POSTN-151993-10 2
CONCLUSIONS
All of the records sought by the summons constitute personally identifiable information
within the meaning of the CCPA. However, if the Cable Company also provides internet
or telephone service to the Taxpayer, the Service can summon the records showing the
source of the Taxpayer’s payments pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2703(c)(2).
FACTS
The Service served a third-party collection summons on the Cable Company to obtain
information that might identify the bank account or other source from which the
Taxpayer made monthly payments. The summons required the Cable Company to
produce copies of the Taxpayer’s checks or records of his direct debit payments for the
prior three months, copies of the taxpayer’s credit or service application, records of his
deposit, and copies of the Cable Company’s most recent billing statement showing the
Taxpayer’s account contact information. This information was sought with respect to a
particular account number as well as “any and all accounts belonging to or associated
with” the taxpayer. The Cable Company declined to comply with the summons, stating
it was precluded by the CCPA from producing personally identifiable information. You
have asked whether the information described in the summons constitutes personally
identifiable information within the meaning of the CCPA and whether the cable company
is, in fact, barred from complying with the Service’s summons. The summoned Cable
Company provides telephone and internet service.
LAW AND ANALYSIS
- Definition of Personally Identifiable Information
The CCPA protects cable subscribers’ privacy by limiting the disclosure of personally
identifiable information about subscribers without their prior written consent. With
certain exceptions, 47 U.S.C. § 551(c)(1) provides the general prohibition. In pertinent
part, it states:
(c) Disclosure of personally identifiable information
(1) [A] cable operator shall not disclose personally identifiable information
concerning any subscriber without the prior written or electronic consent of
the subscriber concerned and shall take such actions as are necessary to
prevent unauthorized access to such information by a person other than
the subscriber or cable operator.
The statute does not define personally identifiable information; it merely provides that
the term does not include any record of aggregate data which does not identify
particular persons. 47 U.S.C § 551(a)(2)(A). However, the plain meaning of the term
and interpretative case law lead to the conclusion that personally identifiable information
is any information collected by a cable company that identifies a particular person,
POSTN-151993-10 3
notwithstanding how the information was collected. 1 See Scofield v. Telecable of
Overland Park, Inc. 973 F.2d 874 (10th Cir. 1992) (The court expressly held that
personally identifiable information is not limited to information collected through the
cable system; impliedly reasoning that it includes information that the subscriber has
furnished and that the cable company maintains in the ordinary course of business);
United States v. Cox Cable Communications, 98-1 USTC 50415, *1 n.4 (N.D. Fla. 1998)
(Personally identifiable information includes a cable customer’s billing and payment
history).
Based on this decisional law, we conclude that the information sought in the summons,
which relates specifically to the Taxpayer’s account with the Cable Company, is
personally identifiable information and is subject to the CCPA’s privacy restrictions.
This conclusion, however, does not end the relevant statutory analysis. The CCPA
contains an exception relevant to the Service’s summons.
- Exception under 47 U.S.C. § 551(c)(2)(D) to the Prohibition on Disclosure
The CCPA contains an exception in subsection 551(c)(2)(D) to the general
nondisclosure rule. Specifically, it provides that a cable operator may disclose
personally identifiable information if the disclosure is –
(D) to a government entity as authorized under chapters 119, 121, or 206
of title 18, except such disclosure shall not include records revealing cable
subscriber selection of video programming from a cable operator.
(Emphasis added.)
The cross reference to Title 18, chapter 121 refers to 18 U.S.C. §§ 2701–2711, the
Stored Wire and Electronic Communications and Transactional Records Access
Statute, 2 enacted in 1986 to protect stored internet communications. See Orin S. Kerr,
A User’s Guide to the Stored Communications Act, and a Legislator’s Guide to
Amending It, 72 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1208 (2004). Among other things, this statute
restricts the ability of providers of electronic communication services, such as internet
service providers and telephone companies, to disclose information about their
customers and subscribers to government agencies and others. Section 2703(c)(2),
however, contains an exception for certain limited disclosures to government agencies
made pursuant to an administrative subpoena. Under this subsection, internet service
providers and telephone service providers can disclose certain basic information not
1 For purposes of interpreting the CCPA, the issue of whether personally identifiable information included
only information gathered by a cable company through a two-way cable system, such as information
about the subscriber’s viewing patterns or transactions made over the cable system, has been resolved.
In Chief Counsel Advisory 200230034, we rejected the previous position that personally identifiable
information includes only information gathered through the cable system, reasoning instead that the
concept includes any information a cable company collects that identifies a particular person. IRS CCA
200230034, 2002 WL 1730123, July 26, 2002.
2 This statute is also referred to by certain commentators as The Stored Communications Act.
POSTN-151993-10 4
related to the contents of the communications stored on their systems. Specifically,
section 2703(c)(2) provides:
A provider of electronic communication service or remote computing
service shall disclose to a governmental entity theB
(A) name;
(B) address;
(C) local and long distance telephone connection records, or
records of session times and durations;
(D) length of service (including start date) and types of service
utilized;
(E) telephone or instrument number or other subscriber number or
identity, including any temporarily assigned network address; and
(F) means and source of payment for such service (including any
credit card or bank account number),
of a subscriber to or customer of such service when the governmental
entity uses an administrative subpoena authorized by a Federal or State
statute. (Emphasis added.)
Regarding the summons for which you have sought advice, you have informed us that
the Cable Company also provides internet and telephone services. If the Cable
Company provides the Taxpayer with these services, the Service can use an
administrative summons to obtain information about the Taxpayer’s source of payment
for those services. The second document request contained in the summons seeks that
type of information, and because the summons seeks this information concerning “any
and all accounts belonging to or associated with” the Taxpayer, the Service need not
issue a new summons. The second document request is enforceable pursuant to the
exception codified in 18 U.S.C. § 2703(c)(2)(F).
CASE DEVELOPMENT, HAZARDS AND OTHER CONSIDERATIONS
This writing may contain privileged information. Any unauthorized disclosure of this
writing may undermine our ability to protect the privileged information. If disclosure is
determined to be necessary, please contact this office for our views.
Please call (202) 622-4570 if you have any further questions.
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2011, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.