PLR 1123015: IRS extends the time to make consent dividend elections

Plain-English summary

An investment corporation asked for more time to make consent dividend elections for a tax year in which its consolidated group had personal holding company income and tax. The corporation said its accountant did not tell it about the election until more than a year after the return deadline, and the IRS examination was already underway. The IRS found reasonable reliance on a qualified tax professional and determined that the government would not be prejudiced. It granted 60 days to file the required forms and attach the ruling to an amended return, subject to the letter's conditions.

Ruling snapshot

• Question: May the taxpayer make the section 565 consent dividend elections after the return deadline?
• Outcome: Approved, with a 60-day extension and required filings.
• Key authorities: IRC §§ 561, 565, 6501, 6110; Treas. Reg. §§ 1.565-1, 301.9100-1, 301.9100-3.

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201123015 [Third Party Communication:
Release Date: 6/10/2011 Date of Communication: Month DD, YYYY]
Index Number: 9100.00-00
Person To Contact:
---------------------- ----------------------, ID No. -------------
------------- Telephone Number:
---------------------------------------------------- ---------------------
---------------------------------- Refer Reply To:
--------------------------------------------- CC:ITA:B03
PLR-144094-10
Date:
March 09, 2011

              TY: -------

              LEGEND:

              Taxpayer = -----------------------------
              Tier 1 Sub = --------------------------------------------
              Tier 2 Sub = -------------------------------------------------
              Year 1 = -------
              Liquidation Date = --------------------------
              Accountant’s Notification Date = -------------------
              Initial Examination Date = ----------------------
              Conference Date = ---------------------
              Examination Closing Date = ------------------
              $A = ----------------
              $B = ----
              $C = -----------
              $D = ----------
              $E = -------------
              $F = -----------
              $G = -----------

Dear -------------:

This is in response to your letter dated -----------------------. In your letter, you requested
an extension of time to file the forms necessary to make a consent dividend election
under section 565 of the Internal Revenue Code for the tax year ending December 31,
Year 1. The request is based on sections 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 of the Procedure
and Administrative Regulations.

FACTS

Taxpayer, a corporation, is an investment firm engaged in providing services and capital
to start-up companies in the money management and investment advisory community.
PLR-144094-10 2

Taxpayer, together with Tier 1 Sub and Tier 2 Sub, filed a consolidated income tax
return for federal income tax purposes for the tax year at issue. In Year 1, Taxpayer
owned -----% of the single class of membership interest in Tier 1 Sub, a limited liability
corporation. Tier 1 Sub elected to be treated as a corporation for federal tax purposes.
As of the start of Year 1, Tier 1 Sub owned -----% of the stock of Tier 2 Sub, a
corporation. Tier 2 Sub became a member of Taxpayer’s affiliated group as of the start
of Year 1 as a result of Tier 2 Sub’s redemption of all of the shares of its stock owned by
unrelated third persons during the year before Year 1. Tier 2 Sub was liquidated on the
Liquidation Date during Year 1 and all of its assets transferred to Tier 1 Sub.

In Year 1, Taxpayer’s undistributed personal holding company income was negative $A
and its personal holding company tax was $B. Tier 1 Sub’s undistributed personal
holding company income was $C and its personal holding company tax was $D. Tier 2
Sub’s undistributed personal holding company income was $E and its personal holding
company tax was $F. Thus, Taxpayer’s accountant determined that its consolidated
undistributed personal holding company tax for Year 1 totaled $G (including $D from
Tier 1 Sub and $F from Tier 2 Sub) and Taxpayer paid this amount with its filed return.
Taxpayer’s accountant did not advise Taxpayer of the possibility of issuing consent
dividends to reduce or eliminate its consolidated personal holding company tax until the
Accountant’s Notification Date, more than a year after the return due date for Year 1.

On or about the Accountant’s Notification Date, Taxpayer’s accountant began work on
drafting the ruling request. Shortly thereafter, in the month of the Initial Examination
Date, Taxpayer received a Notice of Examination stating that its return for Year 1 was
under examination. Taxpayer’s accountant represented Taxpayer in the examination
proceedings. At a meeting between the Revenue Agent and Taxpayer’s accountant on
the Conference Date, Taxpayer’s accountant notified the Revenue Agent conducting the
examination of the facts regarding Taxpayer’s failure to file the necessary forms to
make a consent dividend.

On or about the Examination Closing Date, the examination was concluded. No
penalties were imposed. The Revenue Agent also informed Taxpayer that he could not
provide relief for Taxpayer’s failure to make timely consent dividends as part of the
resolution of the examination.

LAW AND ANALYSIS

Section 565 of the Code provides that if any person owns consent stock (as defined in
section 565(f)(1)) in a corporation on the last day of the taxable year of such
corporation, and such person agrees, in a consent filed with the return of such
corporation in accordance with the regulations, to treat as a dividend the amount
specified in such consent, the amount so specified shall, except as provided in section
565(b), constitute a consent dividend for purposes of section 561 (relating to the
deduction for dividends paid). Consent stock, which is the type of stock with respect to
PLR-144094-10 3

which consent dividends are allowed (section 565(a)), includes what is generally known
as common stock and participating preferred stock, the participation rights of which are
unlimited (section 1.565-6(a)(1) of the Income Tax Regulations).

Section 1.565-1(a) provides that the "dividends paid deduction," as defined in section
561, includes the consent dividends for the taxable year. A consent dividend is a
hypothetical distribution (as distinguished from an actual distribution) made by certain
corporations to any person who owns consent stock on the last day of the taxable year
of such corporation and who agrees to treat the hypothetical distribution as an actual
dividend, subject to specified limitations, by filing a consent at the time and in the
manner specified in section 1.565-1(b).

Section 1.565-1(b)(3) provides that a consent may be filed no later than the due date of
the corporation's income tax return for the taxable year for which the dividends paid
deduction is claimed. Under Rev. Rul. 78-296, 1978-2 C.B. 183, the due date for
purposes of section 1.565-1(b)(3) includes the extended due date of a return filed
pursuant to an extension of time to file.

Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration
Regulations provide the standards the Commissioner uses to determine whether to
grant an extension of time to make a regulatory election. Section 301.9100-2 provides
automatic extensions of time for making certain elections. Section 301.9100-3 provides
extensions of time for making elections that do not meet the requirements of section
301.9100-2.

Section 301.9100-1(b) defines the term "regulatory election" as an election whose due
date is prescribed by a regulation published in the Federal Register, or a revenue ruling,
procedure, notice or announcement published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin.

Section 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner may grant a reasonable
extension of time to make a regulatory election, or a statutory election (but no more than
six months except in the case of a taxpayer who is abroad) under all subtitles of the
Internal Revenue Code except subtitles E, G, H and I.

Section 301.9100-3 provides extensions of time to make a regulatory election under
Code sections other than those for which section 301.9100-2 expressly permits
automatic extensions. Requests for extensions of time for regulatory elections will be
granted when the taxpayer provides evidence (including affidavits described in the
regulations) to establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the taxpayer acted
reasonably and in good faith, and granting relief will not prejudice the interests of the
government.

Section 301.9100-3(b)(1) states that a taxpayer will be deemed to have acted
reasonably and in good faith if the taxpayer --
PLR-144094-10 4

(i) requests relief before the failure to make the regulatory election is discovered by the
Service;

(ii) failed to make the election because of intervening events beyond the taxpayer's
control;

(iii) failed to make the election because, after exercising due diligence, the taxpayer was
unaware of the necessity for the election;

(iv) reasonably relied on the written advice of the Service; or

(v) reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional, and the tax professional failed to
make, or advise the taxpayer to make, the election.

Under section 301.9100-3(b)(3), a taxpayer will not be considered to have acted
reasonably and in good faith if the taxpayer --

(i) seeks to alter a return position for which an accuracy related penalty has been or
could be imposed under section 6662 at the time the taxpayer requests relief (taking
into account section 1.6664-2(c)(3)) and the new position requires or permits a
regulatory election for which relief is requested;

(ii) was informed in all material respects of the required election and related tax
consequences, but chose not to file the election; or

(iii) uses hindsight in requesting relief. If specific facts have changed since the original
deadline that make the election advantageous to a taxpayer, the Service will not
ordinarily grant relief.

Taxpayer in this case has represented that it reasonably relied on a qualified tax
professional, and the tax professional failed to make, or advise the taxpayer to make,
the election. Thus, under section 301.9100-3(b)(1)(v), Taxpayer will be deemed to have
acted reasonably and in good faith. Taxpayer has also represented that none of the
circumstances listed in section 301.9100-3(b)(3) apply.

Section 301.9100-3(c)(1)(i) provides, in part, that the interests of the government are
prejudiced if granting relief would result in the taxpayer having a lower tax liability in the
aggregate for all taxable years affected by the election than the taxpayer would have
had if the election had been timely made (taking into account the time value of money).
Section 301.9100-3(c)(1)(ii) provides, in part, that the interests of the government are
ordinarily prejudiced if the taxable year in which the regulatory election should have
been made, or any taxable years that would have been affected by the election had it
been timely made, are closed by the period of limitations on assessment under
PLR-144094-10 5

section 6501(a) before the taxpayer’s receipt of a ruling granting relief.

Under these criteria, the interests of the government are not prejudiced in this case.
Taxpayer has represented that granting relief would not result in a lower tax liability in
the aggregate for all taxable years affected by the election than Taxpayer would have
had if the election had been timely made (taking into account the time value of money).
Furthermore, the taxable year in which the regulatory election should have been made
and any taxable years that would have been affected had it been timely made, are not
closed by the period of assessment.

CONCLUSION

Taxpayer's election is a regulatory election, as defined under section 301.9100-1(b),
because the due date of the election is prescribed in the regulations under section
1.565-1(b). In the present situation, the requirements of sections 301.9100-1 and
301.9100-3(b)(1)(v) of the regulations have been satisfied. The information and
representations made by Taxpayer establish that Taxpayer acted reasonably and in
good faith. Furthermore, granting an extension will not prejudice the interests of the
Government. Taxpayer represented that it will not have a lower tax liability in the
aggregate for all taxable years affected by the election if given permission to make the
election than Taxpayer would have if the election were made by the original deadline for
making the election. Taxpayer also represented that the period of assessment for Year
1 will not be closed before receipt of a ruling. Accordingly, Taxpayer is granted an
extension of time for making the election to issue consent dividends for Year 1 in the
amount of $E from Tier 2 Sub to Tier 1 Sub and in the amounts of $C and $E from Tier
1 Sub to Taxpayer until 60 days following the date of this ruling. The election should be
made by filing the forms necessary to make the section 565 consent dividend election
for the taxable Year 1, and by including a copy of this ruling with an amended return for
Year 1.

Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the
federal income tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or
referenced in this ruling.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code
provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is
being sent to your authorized representative.

A copy of this letter must be attached to any income tax return to which it is relevant.
Alternatively, taxpayers filing their returns electronically may satisfy this requirement by
attaching a statement to their return that provides the date and control number of the
PLR-144094-10 6

letter ruling.

The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and representations
submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed
by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted
in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on examination.

                                 Sincerely,



                                 Christopher F. Kane
                                 Branch Chief, Branch 3
                                 (Income Tax & Accounting-)