CCA 201122020: County tax-lien foreclosure sale is not reportable under the cited provisions

Number
201122020
Outcome
Advice
Document type
Chief Counsel Advice
IRS subject
Reporting Requirements for County Tax-Lien Foreclosure
Code sections
§ 6045, § 6050J, § 6050P
Ruling dated
May 5, 2011
Publicly released
June 3, 2011

Apply this to your situation

This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2011, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2011
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It is advice from the IRS Office of Chief Counsel to IRS personnel on the facts they presented, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Chief Counsel advice concludes that a county does not have to issue Forms 1099-S, 1099-A, or 1099-C to a former property owner after a tax-lien foreclosure sale. The advice states that IRC § 6050P does not apply because a state or local government is not within the relevant definition, and § 6050J does not apply because the county is not a lender under the statute. It also concludes that the regulations under § 6045(e) exclude foreclosure transfers made in satisfaction of secured indebtedness from the reporting requirement.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Must a county issue an information return after selling land in a tax-lien foreclosure?
  • Outcome: Advice.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 6045, 6050J, 6050P; Treas. Reg. § 1.6045-4(c)(1)(ii).

Full text (IRS public release)

ID: CCA_2011050512020349 Number: 201122020
Release Date: 6/3/2011
Office: --------------
UILC: 6045.03-05, 6050J.00-00,
6050P.00-00

From: --------------------------
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2011 12:02:11 PM
To: ----------------------
Cc:
Subject: Reporting requirements - county tax lien

Hi -----------

We have looked into your question concerning the reporting requirements of a county related to a tax lien foreclosure sale. For the reasons below, we do not think the county is required to issue a Form 1099-S, Form 1099-A, or Form 1099-C to the former property owner whose land was sold.

We do not think the situation here is reportable under any of the possibly applicable statutes. First, regarding section 6050P, Returns Relating to Cancellation of Indebtedness by Certain Entities, I agree with you that section does not apply. A state or local government is not included within the definition of "an executive, judicial, or legislative entity" under section 6050P(c)(1)(A) based on 31 U.S.C. sec. 3701 and the Instructions to Form 1099. Second, regarding section 6050J, we do not think that section applies either. Based on our reading of the statute, regulations, and Instructions to Form 1099-A, we do not think the county holding the tax lien is a lender within the meaning of the statute.

The third possibility, raised initially by your office, is section 6045(e), dealing with reporting of certain real estate transactions. On its face, section 6045(e) would seem to apply here. The Regulations, however, carve out from the statute's reporting requirements "transfers in full or partial satisfaction of any indebtedness secured by the property so transferred including a foreclosure, transfer in lieu of a foreclosure or an abandonment." Accordingly, under the Regulations, the transaction here is not reportable. We note that when the Regulations under section 6045(e) were originally issued as Temporary Regulations in 1987, they carved out "Transactions reportable under section 6050J." That exception was modified in 1990 when the Service issued Proposed Regulations containing the exemption stated above. The Final Regulations adopted that language without change at section 1.6045-4(c)(1)(ii). Note that the language adopted in the final regulations is significantly broader than the language used in the Temp Regs.

Accordingly, we conclude that the transaction in your fact pattern is not reportable under the sections discussed above and therefore the county is not required to issue a Form 1099 pursuant to those sections.

If you have further questions, please let know.

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace