PLR 201122009: IRS grants an estate more time to elect alternate valuation

Number
201122009
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Alternate Valuation
Code sections
§ 2001, § 2032, § 301, § 6110
Ruling dated
February 24, 2011
Publicly released
June 3, 2011

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2011, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2011
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

An estate timely filed its federal estate tax return, but its executor's first tax professional did not make the alternate valuation election under IRC § 2032. A second tax professional later prepared a supplemental return with the election, and the executor filed it within one year after the return's due date, including extensions. The IRS granted the estate an extension of time to make the election because the executor reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional and the relief would not prejudice the government. The ruling applies only to the redacted estate's facts and does not establish precedent.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May the estate receive more time to make an alternate valuation election under IRC § 2032?
  • Outcome: Approved.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 2001, 2032, 301, 6110; Treas. Reg. §§ 20.2032-1, 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3.

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201122009
Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 6/3/2011
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Person To Contact:
Index Number: 2032.00-00, 9100.00-00
------------------------, ID No. -------------
Telephone Number:
--------------------------
--------------------
--------------------------------
Refer Reply To:
--------------------------------
CC:PSI:04
--------------------------------
PLR-138645-10
Date:
Re: -----------------------------
February 24, 2011

Legend

Decedent = ----------------------------------------------- Executor = ----------------------------------------
CPA 1 = ----------------------
CPA 2 = --------------------
Date 1 = -----------------------
Date 2 = ------------------
Date 3 = -------------------

Dear ---- ------:

This letter responds to your authorized representative’s letter dated August 18, 2010, requesting an extension of time under § 301.9100 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations to make an alternate valuation election under § 2032 of the Internal Revenue Code.

The facts and representations submitted are summarized as follows: Decedent died on Date 1 and the executor, Executor, of Decedent’s estate timely filed Form 706, United States Estate (and Generation-Skipping Transfer) Tax Return on or about Date 2. Executor hired CPA 1 to prepare Form 706. CPA 1 did not make the alternate valuation election under § 2032 on Form 706. Executor later met with CPA 2 who suggested that Executor elect to use alternate valuation. After obtaining appraisals, CPA 2 prepared a supplemental Form 706. On Date 3 (within one year of the due date of the return, including extensions), Executor filed the supplemental Form 706 making the election under § 2032.

Section 2032(a) provides, in part, that the value of the gross estate may be determined, if the executor so elects, by valuing all the property included in the gross estate as follows:
PLR-138645-10
2

(1) In the case of property distributed, sold, exchanged, or otherwise disposed of, within 6 months after the decedent's death such property shall be valued as of the date of distribution, sale, exchange, or other disposition.

(2) In the case of property not distributed, sold, exchanged, or otherwise disposed of, within 6 months after the decedent's death such property shall be valued as of the date 6 months after the decedent's death.

Section 2032(c) provides that no election may be made under § 2032 with respect to an estate unless such election will decrease: (1) the value of the gross estate; and (2) the sum of the tax imposed under chapter 11 of the Code and the tax imposed by chapter 13 with respect to property includible in the decedent's gross estate (reduced by credits allowable against such taxes).

Section 2032(d)(1) provides that an election under § 2032 shall be made by the executor on the return of tax imposed by § 2001. Such election, once made, shall be irrevocable. Under § 2032(d)(2), no election may be made under § 2032 if such return is filed more than 1 year after the time prescribed by law (including extensions) for filing such return.

Section 20.2032-1(b)(3) of the Estate Tax Regulations provides that a request for an extension of time to make the election pursuant to §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 will not be granted unless the estate tax return is filed no later than 1 year after the due date of the return, including extensions.

Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 provide the standards the Commissioner will use to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make an election. Section 301.9100-1(a).

Under § 301.9100-1(c), the Commissioner may grant a reasonable extension of time to make a regulatory election, or statutory election (but no more than 6 months except in the case of a taxpayer who is abroad), under all subtitles of the Internal Revenue Code except subtitles E, G, H, and I, if the taxpayer demonstrates to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the taxpayer has acted reasonably and in good faith, and granting relief will not prejudice the interests of the government.

Section 301.9100-2 provides automatic extension of time for making certain elections. Section 301.9100-3 provides extensions of time for making elections that do not meet the requirements of § 301.9100-2.

Requests for relief under § 301.9100-3 will be granted when the taxpayer provides the evidence to establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and that granting relief will not prejudice the interests of
PLR-138645-10
3

the government.

Section 301.9100-3(b)(1)(v) provides that a taxpayer is deemed to have acted reasonably and in good faith if the taxpayer reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional, including a tax professional employed by the taxpayer, and the tax professional failed to make, or advise the taxpayer to make, the election.

Based on the facts submitted and the representations made, we conclude that the standards of §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 have been satisfied. Consequently, Executor is granted an extension of time to Date 3 for making the alternate valuation election under § 2032. A copy of this letter should be forwarded to the Cincinnati Service Center at the following address: Internal Revenue Service, Cincinnati Service Center -- Stop 82, Cincinnati, OH 45999.

The ruling contained in this letter is based upon information and representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for ruling, it is subject to verification on examination.

Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in this letter.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is being sent to your authorized representative.

Sincerely,

By: ______
Lorraine E. Gardner
Senior Counsel, Branch 4
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs & Special Industries)

Enclosures
Copy for section 6110 purposes
Copy of this letter

cc:

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace