PLR 201117038: IRS waives the 60-day rollover deadline after a broker misappropriates IRA funds

Number
201117038
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Rollover Contributions
Code sections
§ 72, § 408, § 408(d)(1), § 408(d)(3), § 408(d)(3)(A), § 408(d)(3)(B), § 408(d)(3)(D), § 408(d)(3)(I), § 6110(k)(3)
Ruling dated
February 1, 2011
Publicly released
April 29, 2011

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2011, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2011
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The IRS considered a taxpayer who closed several IRAs and annuities to consolidate the funds into rollover accounts. The taxpayer gave the distribution checks to a financial adviser, who prepared false account statements and kept the funds for personal use. The fraud was discovered, and the adviser pleaded guilty and was convicted in federal court of mail fraud. The IRS waived the 60-day rollover requirement and gave the taxpayer 60 days from the ruling date to contribute the combined eligible amount to a rollover IRA.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the IRS waive the 60-day rollover deadline after a financial adviser fraudulently kept IRA and annuity distributions?
  • Outcome: Approved, with 60 days from the ruling date to complete the rollover.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 72, 408(d)(1), 408(d)(3), and 408(d)(3)(I); Rev. Proc. 2003-16; IRC § 6110(k)(3).

Full text (IRS public release)

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION

FEB 01 2011

UIL Nos. 408.03-00

Legend:
Taxpayer A =
Individual B =
IRA X =
IRA Y =
Annuity L =
Annuity M =
Amount A =
Amount B =
Amount C =
Amount D =
Amount E =
Amount F =
Amount G =
Financial Institution R =

Financial Institution S =

Doug Swoveland

Page 2 of 5

Insurance Company Z =
Company Y =
Date 1 =
Date 2 =
Date 3 =
Date 4 =
Date 5 =
Date 6 =
Date 7 =
Date 8 =
Date 9 =
Date 10 =
Date 11 =
Dear:

This is in response to your request dated November 9, 2010, in which you request a waiver of the 60-day rollover requirement contained in section 408(d)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”).

The following facts and representations have been submitted under penalty of perjury in support of the ruling requested:

Taxpayer A, age 61, represents that he received distributions from IRAs X and Y totaling Amount C, and IRA Annuities L and M totaling Amount F. Taxpayer A asserts that his failure to accomplish a rollover within the 60-day period prescribed by section 408(d)(3) of the Code was due to the misappropriation of funds by Individual B.

Taxpayer A established IRAs X and Y with the assistance of Individual B, a licensed securities broker and Taxpayer A’s financial advisor. Individual B was the manager and chief executive officer of Company Y, and worked as an independent contractor with Financial Institution R.

Doug Swoveland

Page 3 of 5

On Date 1, Taxpayer A, acting on the advice of Individual B, closed IRAs X and Y, intending to consolidate the IRA accounts, and roll the distributions over into a single IRA with Financial Institution S. On Date 2, Amount A was distributed from IRA X, and Amount B was distributed from IRA Y (collectively Amount C).

On Date 3, Taxpayer A delivered a check for Amount C to Individual B, made payable to Company Y and Financial Institution S, to establish the rollover IRA. Taxpayer A began receiving account statements from Financial Institution R, listing Taxpayer A as the owner, and Financial Institution S as custodian of the rollover IRA monthly, beginning on Date 4 and ending on Date 5.

On Date 6, Taxpayer A, acting on the advice of Individual B, closed IRA Annuities L and M, intending to roll the distributions over into IRA Annuities with Insurance Company Z. On Date 7, Amount D was distributed from IRA Annuity L and Amount E was distributed from IRA Annuity M (collectively Amount F). On Date 8, Taxpayer A delivered a check for Amount F to Individual B, made payable to Company Y, to establish the rollover IRA Annuities. Taxpayer A received an account statement from Insurance Company Z listing Taxpayer A as annuitant, and Insurance Company Z as custodian of the rollover IRA Annuities, for the period beginning on Date 9 and ending on Date 10.

Taxpayer A asserts that contrary to his instructions to rollover Amounts C and F, Individual B falsely prepared the statements for the rollover IRAs and IRA Annuities, and retained the funds for her own personal benefit and use. It is further represented that the fraud perpetrated by Individual B was discovered by Financial Institution R on Date 11, and has been prosecuted in federal court. Documentation shows that Individual B pled guilty, and was convicted in U.S. District Court on charges of mail fraud in connection with the theft of these funds, as well as others that were handled by her in a similar manner.

Based on the facts and representations, you request a ruling that the Internal Revenue Service (the “Service”) waive the 60-day rollover requirement contained in section 408(d)(3) of the Code, with respect to the distributions of Amount C from IRAs X and Y, and Amount F from IRA Annuities L and M (collectively Amount G).

Section 408(d)(1) of the Code provides that, except as otherwise provided in section 408(d), any amount paid or distributed out of an IRA shall be included in gross income by the payee or distributee, as the case may be, in the manner provided under section 72 of the Code.

Section 408(d)(3) of the Code defines, and provides the rules applicable to IRA rollovers.

Doug Swoveland

Page 4 of 5

Section 408(d)(3)(A) of the Code provides that section 408(d)(1) of the Code does not apply to any amount paid or distributed out of an IRA to the individual for whose benefit the IRA is maintained if

(i) the entire amount received (including money and any other property) is paid into an IRA for the benefit of such individual not later than the 60th day after the day on which the individual receives the payment or distribution; or

(ii) the entire amount received (including money and any other property) is paid into an eligible retirement plan (other than an IRA) for the benefit of such individual not later than the 60th day after the date on which the payment or distribution is received, except that the maximum amount which may be paid into such plan may not exceed the portion of the amount received which is includible in gross income (determined without regard to section 408(d)(3)).

Section 408(d)(3)(B) of the Code provides that section 408(d)(3) does not apply to any amount described in section 408(d)(3)(A)(i) received by an individual from an IRA if at any time during the 1-year period ending on the day of such receipt such individual received any other amount described in section 408(d)(3)(A)(i) from an IRA which was not includible in gross income because of the application of section 408(d)(3).

Section 408(d)(3)(D) of the Code provides a similar 60-day rollover period for partial rollovers.

Section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code provides that the Secretary may waive the 60-day requirement under sections 408(d)(3)(A) and 408(d)(3)(D) of the Code where the failure to waive such requirement would be against equity or good conscience, including casualty, disaster, or other events beyond the reasonable control of the individual subject to such requirement. Only distributions that occurred after December 31, 2001, are eligible for the waiver under section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code.

Rev. Proc. 2003-16, 2003-4 I.R.B. 359 (January 27, 2003) provides that in determining whether to grant a waiver of the 60-day rollover requirement pursuant to sections 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code, the Service will consider all relevant facts and circumstances, including: (1) errors committed by a financial institution; (2) inability to complete a rollover due to death, disability, hospitalization, incarceration, restrictions imposed by a foreign country or postal error; (3) the use of the amount distributed (for example, in the case of payment by check, whether the check was cashed); and (4) the time elapsed since the distribution occurred.

The information and documentation submitted is consistent with Taxpayer A’s assertion that his failure to accomplish timely rollovers was due to the misappropriation of Amount G by Individual B.

Page 5 of 5

Therefore, pursuant to section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code, the Service hereby waives the 60-day rollover requirement with respect to the distributions of Amount C from IRAs X and Y, and Amount F from IRA Annuities L and M. Taxpayer A is granted a period of 60 days from the issuance of this ruling letter to contribute Amount G into a rollover IRA. Provided all other requirements of sections 408(d)(3) of the Code, except the 60-day requirement, are met with respect to such contribution, Amount G will be considered a rollover contribution within the meaning of sections 408(d)(3) of the Code.

No opinion is expressed as to the tax treatment of the transaction described herein under the provisions of any other section of either the Code or regulations which may be applicable thereto.

This letter is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

A copy of this ruling letter has been sent to your authorized representative in accordance with power of attorney on file in this office.

If you wish to inquire about this ruling, please contact , I.D. No. , at
***or *** (FAX). Please address all correspondence to SE:T:EP:RA:T4.

Sincerely yours,

[illegible]

Laura B. Warshawsky, Manager
Employee Plans, Technical Group 4

Enclosures:
Deleted Copy of Ruling Letter
Notice of Intention to Disclose

cc:

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace