Private Letter Ruling 1117037 Released April 29, 2011 Approved Transcribed from scan

PLR 1117037: IRS grants late recharacterization relief after a tax preparer discovers Roth IRA errors

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2011, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2011
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The IRS considered a married couple whose income exceeded the limits for a Roth IRA conversion and some regular Roth IRA contributions. Their CPA discovered the problem only after the deadline for recharacterizing the transactions had passed. The IRS found that the couple had reasonably relied on their tax professional, had requested relief before the IRS discovered the missed elections, and would not prejudice the government by receiving relief. The ruling gave each spouse up to 60 days to recharacterize the specified conversion or contribution amounts back to traditional IRAs.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the IRS extend the deadline for recharacterizing an improper Roth IRA conversion and excess Roth IRA contributions?
  • Outcome: Approved, with up to 60 days from the ruling date to complete the specified recharacterizations.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 408A(c)(3), 408A(d)(6), Treas. Reg. §§ 1.408A-4, 1.408A-5, 301.9100-1, 301.9100-2, and 301.9100-3; IRC § 6110(k)(3).

Full text (IRS public release)

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION

FEB 23 2011

UIL No.: 9100.00-00





Legend:

Taxpayer A................................ ****

Taxpayer B................................ ****

Financial Institution A................. ****

IRA A........................................ *****

Roth IRA X................................ ****

Roth IRA Y................................ ****

Amount 1................................... $****

Amount 2................................... $****

Amount 3................................... $****

*****,
Dear [illegible]:

This is in response to a request dated *, as supplemented by additional
communication dated
*****, in which your authorized representative requests
relief under section 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations
(“regulations”) on your behalf. You submitted the following facts and representations in
connection with your request.

2

Taxpayer A and Taxpayer B are married and file joint Federal Income Tax Returns.
Taxpayer A maintained IRA A and Roth IRA X. Taxpayer B maintains Roth IRA Y. In
****, Taxpayer A converted Amount 1 from IRA A to Roth IRA X. Taxpayer A and
Taxpayer B each also contributed Amount 3 to Roth IRA X and Roth IRA Y,
respectively. All accounts are maintained by Financial Institution A.

Taxpayer A and Taxpayer B filed their joint Federal Income Tax Returns using a CPA.
After amending their * Federal Income Tax Return to correct an unrelated error, the
tax professional employed by Taxpayer A and Taxpayer B realized that for
*,
Taxpayer A and Taxpayer B exceeded the adjusted gross income limits and that part of
their regular contributions to Roth IRA X and Roth IRA Y were not allowed and that
Taxpayer A’s conversion of Amount 1 from IRA A to Roth IRA X was improper. At the
time of this discovery by the return preparer, Taxpayer A and Taxpayer B had missed
the deadline for recharacterizing the contributions. Taxpayer A and Taxpayer B
represent that they are not under examination by the Internal Revenue Service
(Service).

Based on your submission and the above facts and representations, you request a
ruling that, pursuant to section 301.9100-3 of the regulations, Taxpayer A and Taxpayer
B be granted a period of 60 days from the date of this letter ruling to recharacterize
Amount 1 from Roth IRA X back to a traditional IRA, and Amount 2 from Roth IRA X
and Amount 2 from Roth IRA Y, respectively, into traditional IRAs.

With respect to your request for relief under section 301.9100-3 of the regulations,
Code section 408A(d)(6) and section 1.408A-5 of the federal Income Tax Regulations
(“I.T. Regulations”) provide that, except as otherwise provided by the Secretary, a
taxpayer may elect to recharacterize an IRA contribution made to one type of IRA as
having originally been made to another type of IRA by making a trustee-to-trustee
transfer of the IRA contribution, plus earnings, to the other type of IRA. In a
recharacterization, the IRA contribution is treated as having been made to the
transferee IRA and not the transferor IRA. Under section 408A(d)(6) and section
1.408A-5, this recharacterization election generally must occur on or before the date
prescribed by law, including extensions, for filing the taxpayer’s federal income tax
return for the year of contributions.

Section 1.408A-5, Q&A-6 of the I.T. Regulations describes how a taxpayer makes the
election to recharacterize the IRA contribution. To recharacterize an amount that has
been converted from a traditional IRA to a Roth IRA: (1) the taxpayer must notify the
Roth IRA trustee of the taxpayer’s intent to recharacterize the amount, (2) the taxpayer
must provide the trustee (and the transferee trustee, if different from the transferor
trustee) with specified information that is sufficient to effect the recharacterization, and
(3) the trustee must make the transfer.

Code section 408A(c)(3) provides that an individual with an adjusted gross income (as
modified within the meaning of subparagraph (c)(3)(C)) in excess of $100,000 for a

3

taxable year is not permitted to make a qualified rollover contribution to a Roth IRA from
an individual retirement plan other than a Roth IRA during that taxable year.

Section 1.408A-4, Q&A-2 of the I.T. Regulations provides that an individual with
modified adjusted gross income in excess of $100,000 for a taxable year is not
permitted to convert an amount to a Roth IRA during that taxable year. Furthermore,
Q&A-2 provides that in the case of a husband and wife who file a joint federal income
tax return, the modified adjusted gross income subject to the $100,000 limit is the
modified adjusted gross income derived from the joint return using the couple’s
combined income.

Section 1.408A-5, Q&A-3 of the I.T. Regulations provides that a contribution that is
being recharacterized as a contribution to the second IRA is treated as having been
originally contributed to the second IRA on the same date (in the case of a regular
contribution) for the same taxable year that the contribution was made to the first IRA.

Sections 301.9100-1, 301.9100-2, and 301.9100-3 of the regulations provide guidance
concerning requests for relief submitted to the Service on or after December 31, 1997.
Section 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, in his
discretion, may grant a reasonable extension of the time fixed by a regulation, a
revenue ruling, a revenue procedure, a notice, or an announcement published in the
Internal Revenue Bulletin for the making of an election or application for relief in
respect of tax under, among others, Subtitle A of the Code.

Section 301.9100-2 of the regulations lists certain elections for which automatic
extensions of time to file are granted. Section 301.9100-3 generally provides guidance
with respect to the granting of relief with respect to those elections not referenced in

section 301.9100-2. The relief requested in this case is not referenced in section
301.9100-2.

Section 301.9100-3 of the regulations provides that applications for relief that fall within
section 301.9100-3 will be granted when the taxpayer provides sufficient evidence
(including affidavits described in section 301.9100-3(e)(2)) to establish that (1) the

taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and (2) granting relief would not prejudice
the interests of the Government.

Section 301.9100-3(b)(1) of the regulations provides that a taxpayer will be deemed to
have acted reasonably and in good faith (i) if the taxpayer’s request for section
301.9100-1 relief is filed before the failure to make a timely election is discovered by
the Service; (ii) if the taxpayer inadvertently failed to make the election because of
intervening events beyond the taxpayer’s control; (iii) if the taxpayer failed to make the
election because, after exercising reasonable diligence, the taxpayer was unaware of
the necessity for the election; (iv) the taxpayer reasonably relied upon the written
advice of the Service; or (v) the taxpayer reasonably relied on a qualified tax
professional, including a tax professional employed by the taxpayer, and the tax

4

professional failed to make, or advise the taxpayer to make, the election.

Section 301.9100-3(c)(1)(ii) of the regulations provides that ordinarily the interests
of the Government will be treated as prejudiced and that ordinarily the Service will not
grant relief when tax years that would have been affected by the election had it been
timely made are closed by the statute of limitations before the taxpayer’s receipt of a
ruling granting relief under this section.

In this case, Taxpayer A and Taxpayer B were not eligible to do a Roth IRA conversion
in **** because their modified adjusted gross income exceeded the limit of Code
section 408A(c)(3). Also, Taxpayer A and Taxpayer B were each not eligible to
contribute Amount 2 of their total contribution of Amount 3 to Roth IRA X and Roth IRA
Y, respectively. Taxpayer A failed to recharacterize Amount 1 and Amount 2 from
Roth IRA X back to a traditional IRA within the time permitted by law. Also, Taxpayer B
failed to recharacterize Amount 2 from Roth IRA Y back to a traditional IRA within the
time permitted by law. Therefore, it is necessary to determine whether Taxpayer A

and Taxpayer B are eligible for relief under the provisions of section 301.9100-3 of the
regulations.

Taxpayer A and Taxpayer B relied on the services of their tax advisor in preparing their
* returns. Although Taxpayer A and Taxpayer B were ineligible for their Roth
IRA conversion and were ineligible for a portion of their total regular contributions,
Taxpayer A and Taxpayer B were unaware that they were ineligible until receiving
notice from their tax professional upon the completion and filing of their
Federal
Income Tax Return, long after the deadline for a
recharacterization. Taxpayer A
and Taxpayer B were advised by their tax professional of the need to recharacterize
Amount 1 and Amount 2 from Roth IRA X and Amount 2 from Roth IRA Y,
respectively, but only after the deadline for recharacterization had passed. As a result,
Taxpayer A and Taxpayer B requested this ruling after discovering the mistake, but
prior to the Service discovering the failure to make a timely election to recharacterize.
Thus, Taxpayer A and Taxpayer B satisfy clauses (i) and (v) of section 301.9100-
3(b)(1) of the regulations. In addition, the statute of limitations on Taxpayer A and B’s
*** Federal income Tax Return remains open and the interests of the government
would not be prejudiced by providing relief. Accordingly, the Service concludes that,
pursuant to section 301.9100-3 of the regulations, Taxpayer A is granted a period not
to exceed 60 days from the date of this letter to recharacterize Amount 1 and Amount
2 from Roth IRA X back to a traditional IRA. Also, Taxpayer B is granted a period not
to exceed 60 days from the date of this letter to recharacterize Amount 2 from Roth
IRA Y back to a traditional IRA.

This letter assumes that the above traditional IRAs and Roth IRA qualify under Code
sections 408 and 408A, respectively, at all relevant times.

This letter is directed only to the taxpayers who requested it. Code section 6110(k)(3)
provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

2
a

901117037

A copy of this letter has been sent to your authorized representative in accordance
with a power of attorney on file with this office.

Should you have any concerns regarding this ruling, please contact *,
Identification Number
*, at () -****. Please address all correspondence to

*****.

Sincerely yours,

[illegible]

Carlton A. Watkins, Manager
Employee Plans Technical Group 1

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2011, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.