Personal guarantees of a plan loan can be prohibited transactions
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2011, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Chief Counsel advised that a fiduciary or other disqualified person who personally guarantees a plan's indebtedness generally extends credit to the plan. The advice states that this is a prohibited transaction under IRC § 4975(c)(1)(B), unless a special employee stock ownership plan exemption applies. The email also refers to an ERISA Conference Report and two Department of Labor advisory opinions.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Does a personal guarantee of a plan loan by a fiduciary or other disqualified person violate the prohibited-transaction rules?
- Outcome: Advice given.
- Key authorities: IRC § 4975(c)(1)(B); H.R. Rep. No. 1280, 93d Cong., 2d Sess., at 308 (1974); DOL Advisory Opinions 90-33A and 2009-03A.
Full text (IRS public release)
ID: CCA_2011012709442650 Number: 201108034
Release Date: 2/25/2011
Office: -------------------------
UILC: 4975.03-02
From: --------------------
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 9:44:30 AM
To: -------------------------
Cc:
Subject: Guaranteeing a Loan
This is in response to your voice message.
With respect to the issue concerning signing personally as guarantors of a note, Congress
stated in the ERISA Conference Report that, “…a prohibited transaction generally will occur if a
loan to a plan is guaranteed by a party-in-interest [disqualified person], unless it comes within
the special exemption for employee stock ownership plans.” H.R. Rep. No. 1280, 93d Cong., 2d
Sess., at 308 (1974). Consequently, a guarantee of a plan’s indebtedness by a fiduciary or other
disqualified person is an extension of credit to the plan in violation of section 4975(c)(1)(B) of
the Code. See the attached DOL Advisory Opinion 90-33A (July 3, 1990) and DOL Advisory
Opinion 2009-03A (October 27, 2009).
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2011, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.