PLR 201108028: S corporation status restored after an inadvertent termination

Number
201108028
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Inadvertent Terminations
Code sections
§ 1361, § 1362, § 6110
Ruling dated
November 18, 2010
Publicly released
February 25, 2011

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2011, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2011
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The IRS granted relief to a corporation whose S corporation election terminated when shares were transferred to a trust that had not filed an electing small business trust election. The corporation represented that the termination was inadvertent, that the parties had filed returns consistently with S corporation treatment, and that they would make any required adjustments. The IRS concluded that the termination was inadvertent under section 1362(f). It allowed the corporation to be treated as an S corporation from the original effective date, provided the trust filed the required ESBT election within 120 days and the election was not otherwise ineffective or terminated.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Can the corporation retain S corporation treatment after its election terminated because of an ineligible trust shareholder?
  • Outcome: Approved
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 1361(e), 1361(b), 1362(a), 1362(d), and 1362(f); Treas. Reg. § 1.1361-1(m)(2)

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201108028
Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 2/25/2011
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 1362.04-00
Person To Contact:
-------------------------------------
--------------, ID No. -------------
-----------------------------
Telephone Number:
--------------------------
---------------------
------------------------------------------ Refer Reply To:
CC:PSI:B02
PLR-145758-10
Date:
November 18, 2010

Legend

X = -----------------------------


Trust = ------------------------------------
----------------------------

State = -------------

Year = -------

D1 = -------------------------

D2 = -------------------------

D3 = ----------------------

Dear --------------:

This responds to a letter dated November 4, 2010, submitted on behalf of X by X’s authorized representative, requesting inadvertent termination relief pursuant to § 1362(f) of the Internal Revenue Code.

The information submitted states that X was incorporated in Year under the laws of State. X filed a timely election under § 1362(a) to be treated as an S corporation effective beginning on D1.

On D2, shares of X stock were transferred to Trust. X represents that Trust was eligible to be an electing small business trust (ESBT) within the meaning of § 1361(e) effective
PLR-145758-10
2

D2. However, no election to be to an ESBT was filed on behalf of Trust. Therefore, the Trust was not a permissible shareholder, and X’s S corporation election was terminated effective D2.

X represents that the circumstances resulting in the termination of X’s S corporation election were inadvertent and were not motivated by tax avoidance or retroactive tax planning. Additionally, X represents that X and its shareholders have filed their federal income tax returns consistent with having a valid S corporation election in effect for X. X and its shareholders have agreed to make such adjustments (consistent with the treatment of X as an S corporation) as may be required by the Secretary.

Section 1362(f) provides that if (1) an election under § 1362(a) by any corporation (A) was not effective for the taxable year for which made (determined without regard to
§ 1362(b)(2)) by reason of a failure to meet the requirements of § 1361(b) or to obtain shareholder consents, or (B) was terminated under paragraph (2) or (3) of § 1362(d); (2) the Secretary determines that the circumstances resulting in such ineffectiveness or termination were inadvertent, (3) no later than a reasonable period of time after discovery of the event resulting in the ineffectiveness, steps were taken (A) so that the corporation is a small business corporation, or (B) to acquire the required shareholder consents, and (4) the corporation, and each person who was a shareholder of the corporation at any time during the period specified pursuant to § 1362(f), agrees to make such adjustments (consistent with the treatment of the corporation as an S corporation) as may be required by the Secretary with respect to such period, then, notwithstanding the circumstances resulting in such ineffectiveness, the corporation shall be treated as an S corporation during the period specified by the Secretary.

Based on the information submitted and the representations made, we conclude that X’s S corporation election was inadvertently terminated on D2 because X had an ineligible shareholder. Therefore, pursuant to the provisions of § 1362(f), X will be treated as an S corporation from D1 and thereafter, provided that the trustee of Trust files an ESBT election effective D3, pursuant to the procedures set forth in § 1.1361- 1(m)(2), with the appropriate service center within 120 days of the date of this letter, and provided that X’s election to be an S corporation was not otherwise ineffective and was not terminated under § 1362(d). A copy of this letter should be attached to the ESBT election.

Except for the specific ruling above, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the federal tax consequences of the facts of this case under any other provision of the Code. Specifically, no opinion is expressed or implied regarding X's eligibility to be an S corporation or Trust's eligibility to be an ESBT.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
PLR-145758-10
3

Pursuant to a power of attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is being forwarded to X’s authorized representatives.

Sincerely,

Bradford R. Poston
Senior Counsel, Branch 2
Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs & Special Industries)

Enclosures (2)
Copy of this letter
Copy for section 6110 purposes

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace