Private Letter Ruling 1108025 Released February 25, 2011 Approved

PLR 1108025: Corporate reincorporation treated as a type F reorganization

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2011, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2011
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The IRS ruled on a proposed transaction in which an insurance company would change its place of incorporation from one country to another under a written plan of reorganization. The company would remain a domestic corporation for federal tax purposes under section 953(d), and its parent would remain the sole shareholder before and after the transaction. The IRS concluded that the transaction would qualify as a type F reorganization under section 368(a)(1)(F). It also ruled that the transaction would not end the section 953(d) election, and that specified assets, liabilities, stock bases, holding periods, tax attributes, and the taxable year would carry over as described in the ruling.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: What are the federal income tax consequences of changing the place of incorporation under the proposed transaction?
  • Outcome: Approved
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 953(d), 354, 357, 358, 361, 362, 368, 381, 1032, 1223, and 1504; Treas. Reg. §§ 1.1502-1(f)(4)(i), 1.1502-13(j)(2), 1.1502-47(d)(12)(i), 1.381(b)-1, and 1.381(b)-1(a)(2)

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201108025 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 2/25/2011 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 368.06-00 Change in Identity,
etc. (Type “F”) Person To Contact:
----------------------, ID No. -----------------
---------------------- Telephone Number:
------------------------------------ ---------------------
------------------- Refer Reply To:
--------------------------------------- CC:CORP:B03
-------------------------------------- PLR-137718-10
Date:
November 23, 2010

Legend

Parent = --------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------
------------------------

Oldco = -----------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


                       ------------------------

Newco = ----------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


                       ----------
                       ------------------------

Country X = ------------

Country Y = ----------------------

State A = -------------

Date 1 = ----------------------

Dear ---------------:
PLR-137718-10 2

This letter responds to your letter dated September 14, 2010 requesting rulings as to
the federal income tax consequences of a proposed transaction. The information
provided in that request and in subsequent correspondence is summarized below.

Parent, a corporation organized under the laws of State A, operates as a holding
company. Parent is the common parent of an affiliated group of corporations (“Parent’s
consolidated group”) that files a “life-nonlife” consolidated federal income tax return
pursuant to § 1504(c)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code.

Oldco, a company organized under the laws of Country X, is an insurance company.
Oldco is a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of Parent and a member of Parent’s
consolidated group. Oldco elected to be treated as a domestic corporation for federal
tax purposes under § 953(d) effective as of Date 1.

Oldco proposes to follow the legally prescribed processes in Country X and Country Y,
respectively, pursuant to a written plan of reorganization to change its place of
incorporation from Country X to Country Y (the “Proposed Transaction”).

Oldco makes the following representations with respect to the Proposed Transaction:

(a) Oldco is classified as an association taxable as a corporation for federal tax
purposes and is treated as a domestic corporation for federal tax purposes.

(b) Since Date 1, the effective date of its election under § 953(d), Oldco has
satisfied the requirements to be treated as a domestic corporation for federal
tax purposes pursuant to that section.

(c) Following the Proposed Transaction, Newco will continue to satisfy the
requirements to be treated as a domestic corporation for federal tax purposes
pursuant to § 953(d).

(d) Oldco is not presently, and Newco will not be immediately after the Proposed
Transaction, under the jurisdiction of any court in a Title 11 or similar case
within the meaning of § 368(a)(3)(A).

(e) The Proposed Transaction will be consummated pursuant to a written plan of
reorganization, will be effected solely by the change in place of incorporation of
Oldco under the laws of Country X and Country Y, and will be undertaken for a
bona fide business purpose.

(f) The Proposed Transaction will be effected in a manner that complies with all
the applicable legal and regulatory requirements.
PLR-137718-10 3

(g) Parent will be the sole shareholder of Oldco immediately before the Proposed
Transaction and the sole shareholder of Newco immediately after the Proposed
Transaction.

(h) At the time of the Proposed Transaction, Oldco will not have any warrants,
options, convertible securities, or any other type of right pursuant to which any
person could acquire an ownership interest in Oldco.

(i) Parent will own all of the outstanding shares of Newco immediately after the
Proposed Transaction solely by reason of its ownership of the shares of Oldco
immediately before the Proposed Transaction.

(j) Newco has no plan or intention to reacquire any of its shares following the
Proposed Transaction.

(k) The fair market value of Newco shares held by Parent immediately after the
Proposed Transaction will be approximately equal to the fair market value of
Oldco shares held by Parent immediately before the Proposed Transaction.

(l) Immediately after the Proposed Transaction, Newco will possess the same
assets and liabilities as those possessed by Oldco immediately before the
Proposed Transaction except for assets used to pay expenses, if any, incurred
in connection with the Proposed Transaction. No assets will be distributed by
Oldco in the Proposed Transaction.

(m) Newco has no plan or intention to sell or otherwise dispose of any of the assets
held by Oldco immediately before the Proposed Transaction, except for
dispositions made in the ordinary course of business.

(n) The liabilities of Oldco deemed to be assumed by Newco in the Proposed
Transaction, plus the liabilities, if any, to which the assets of Oldco deemed to
be transferred to Newco in the Proposed Transaction are subject, will have
been incurred by Oldco in the ordinary course of its business and are
associated with the assets deemed to be transferred.

(o) Each of Parent, Oldco, and Newco will pay its respective expenses, if any,
incurred in connection with the Proposed Transaction.

(p) Assuming that the Proposed Transaction constitutes a reorganization within the
meaning of § 368(a)(1)(F), (i) Newco will constitute a “successor” within the
meaning of § 1.1502-1(f)(4)(i) of the Income Tax Regulations with respect to
Oldco; (ii) Newco will constitute a “successor person” within the meaning of §
1.1502-13(j)(2) with respect to Oldco; and (iii) Newco will constitute an
“eligible corporation” within the meaning of § 1.1502-47(d)(12)(i) with respect to
the Parent’s consolidated group.
PLR-137718-10 4

Based solely upon the information submitted and the representations set forth above,
we rule as follows:

  1. The Proposed Transaction will constitute a reorganization within the meaning of
    § 368(a)(1)(F). Oldco and Newco will each be “a party to the reorganization”
    under § 368(b).

  2. Oldco’s 953(d) election will not terminate as a result of the Proposed
    Transaction.

  3. Oldco will recognize no gain or loss on the deemed transfer of assets to Newco
    in exchange for Newco stock and Newco’s assumption of Oldco’s liabilities in
    the Proposed Transaction (§§ 361(a) and 357(a)).

  4. Newco will recognize no gain or loss on the receipt of Oldco’s assets and
    liabilities in the deemed exchange for Newco stock (§ 1032(a)).

  5. The basis of each asset held by Newco immediately after the Proposed
    Transaction will be the same as the basis of such asset in the hands of Oldco
    immediately prior to the Proposed Transaction (§ 362(b)).

  6. The holding period of each asset held by Newco immediately after the Proposed
    transaction will include the period during which such asset was held
    by Oldco (§ 1223(2)).

  7. Oldco will recognize no gain or loss on the deemed distribution to Parent of the
    Newco stock (§ 361(c)(1)).

  8. Parent will recognize no gain or loss on the deemed exchange of the Oldco
    stock for Newco stock (§ 354(a)(1)).

  9. The basis of the shares of Newco stock deemed to be received by Parent will
    be the same as the basis in the Oldco stock deemed to be exchanged therefore
    (§ 358(a)).

  10. The holding period of the shares of Newco stock deemed to be received by
    Parent in the Proposed Transaction will include the holding period of the shares
    of Oldco deemed to be exchanged therefor, provided that Parent holds the
    Oldco stock as a capital asset on the date of the Proposed Transaction
    (§ 1223(1)).

  11. The tax attributes of Oldco enumerated in § 381(c) will be taken into account by
    Newco as if there had been no reorganization (§ 1.381(b)-1(a)(2)).
    PLR-137718-10 5

    1. The taxable year of Oldco will not end on the date of the Proposed Transaction,
      and such tax year continues in the name of Newco (§ 1.381(b)-1).

Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the
tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in this
letter.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code
provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

Temporary or final regulations pertaining to one or more of the issues addressed in this
ruling have not yet been adopted. Therefore, this ruling will be modified or revoked by
the adoption of temporary or final regulations, to the extent the regulations are
inconsistent with any conclusion in the letter ruling. See section 11.04 of Rev. Proc.
2010-1, 2010-1 I.R.B. 1, 49. However, when the criteria in section 11.06 of Rev. Proc.
2010-1, 2010-1 I.R.B. 1, 50 are satisfied, a ruling is not revoked or modified retroactively
except in rare or unusual circumstances.

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is
being sent to your authorized representative.

A copy of this letter must be attached to any income tax return to which it is relevant.
Alternatively, taxpayers filing their returns electronically may satisfy this requirement by
attaching a statement to their return that provides the date and control number of the
letter ruling.

The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and representations
submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed
by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted
in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on examination.

                                   Sincerely,




                                   ____________________________________
                                   Lisa A. Fuller
                                   Senior Counsel, Branch 1
                                   Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate)

cc:

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2011, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.