CCA 201107017: TEFRA status depends on the partnership return and reasonable IRS reliance
Apply this to your situation
This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2011, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Chief Counsel advice addresses whether the TEFRA partnership procedures apply when a partnership return lists a disregarded entity as a partner and an amended return is later filed. The advice says the analysis generally uses the partnership return as of the beginning of the partnership proceeding. Listing a disregarded entity as a partner automatically makes the TEFRA procedures apply, and a proceeding is required to determine that the listed partner was not a partner in fact. Reliance on the return must still be reasonable, which depends on the other information the IRS had and when it received that information.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: When do the TEFRA partnership procedures apply after a partnership return and later facts or amendments are considered?
- Outcome: Advice given.
- Key authorities: IRC § 6231(g); Rev. Rul. 2004-88; Samuelli v. Commissioner, 2009 WL 1397177; Historic Boardwalk Hall LLC v. Commissioner, 136 T.C. No. 1.
Full text (IRS public release)
ID: CCA_2011011310053037 Number: 201107017
Release Date: 2/18/2011
Office: ----------
UILC: 6231.01-01
From: -------------------
Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2011 10:05:34 AM
To: --------------------
Cc: ----------------------------------
Subject: RE: TEFRA Status Inquiry
Your facts are a little unclear since you do not state what year is under audit, when the audit for that year began, for what partnership year the amended return was filed, and when we learned of contrary facts relative to the date the audit began.
The determination of whether the TEFRA procedures apply is generally determined based on the partnership return as of the beginning of the partnership proceeding. See Samuelli v. Commissioner 2009 WL 1397177 (9th Cir. May 18, 2009) (whether small partnership exception applies) and I.R.C. 6231(g)(reliance on partnership return to determine if TEFRA procedures apply if reliance is reasonable). The listing of a disregarded entity as a partner automatically makes the TEFRA partnership procedures apply. Rev. Rul. 2004-88. If TEFRA applies, A TEFRA partnership proceeding is required to determine that a listed partner is not a partner in fact. Historic Boardwalk Hall LLC et al. v. Commissioner; 136 T.C. No. 1; No. 11273-07 (Jan. 3, 2011).
Reliance on the partnership return under section 6231(g) must be "reasonable." This is a factual issue that may depend on what other information we had and when we had it. -------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace