CCA 201107013: Protective claim did not extend the refund period for separate NOL losses
Apply this to your situation
This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2011, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Chief Counsel advice concludes that the period under IRC § 6511 for filing a refund claim based on specified net operating losses had expired. The advice also says that a protective claim relating to Ponzi scheme losses for a redacted year did not allow the taxpayer to file a new refund claim based on those separate net operating losses.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Could a protective claim for Ponzi scheme losses preserve a later refund claim based on net operating losses?
- Outcome: Advice given.
- Key authorities: IRC § 6511.
Full text (IRS public release)
ID: CCA_2010100417210544 Number: 201107013
Release Date: 2/18/2011
Office: ----------------------------
UILC: 6511.00-00
From: ---------------------
Sent: Monday, October 04, 2010 5:21:06 PM
To: -----------------------
Cc:
Subject: RE: IRC 6511 Appeals Case
-----------
Based solely on these facts, the section 6511 period for filing a refund claim based on the net operating losses at issue is expired. The protective claim for the ------- year relating to the Ponzi scheme losses would not operate to allow the taxpayer to now file a refund claim based on the net operating losses. Please let me know if you would like to discuss further.
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace