CCA 201106014: A foreign entity that cannot be a TMP cannot extend the partnership statute
Apply this to your situation
This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2011, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Chief Counsel advice addressed whether a tax matters partner could sign Form 872-P or authorize an attorney-in-fact to sign it. The advice concluded that a tax matters partner may do so under IRC § 6229(b)(1)(B), but a foreign entity may not qualify as a tax matters partner under the cited regulation. If it cannot qualify, it cannot extend the statute as tax matters partner or authorize another person to do so.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: May a foreign entity that is not eligible to be a tax matters partner extend the partnership statute or authorize someone else to extend it?
- Outcome: Advice given.
- Key authorities: IRC § 6229(b)(1)(B); Treas. Reg. § 301.6231(a)(7)-1(b)(2); Form 872-P.
Full text (IRS public release)
ID: CCA_2011011211084437 Number: 201106014
Release Date: 2/11/2011
Office: ----------
UILC: 6229.02-00
From: -------------------
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2011 11:08:49 AM
To: ---------------------
Cc: ----------------------------------
Subject: RE: 2848 and 872-P
A TMP can sign a Form 872-P under section 6229(b)((1)(B) or authorize his power of attorney to do so.
But a foreign entity may not be eligible to be TMP under Treas. Reg. 301.6231(a)(7)-1(b)(2). If so, it
cannot extend the statute as TMP or authorize anyone else to.
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace