PLR 201104030: The IRS allowed an inadvertent QSub election to continue

Number
201104030
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Inadvertent Terminations
Code sections
§ 1361, § 1362
Ruling dated
October 5, 2010
Publicly released
January 28, 2011

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2011, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2011
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The IRS ruled that a corporation's ineffective election to treat a subsidiary as a qualified subchapter S subsidiary was inadvertent. The election failed because of procedural defects, and the subsidiary later dissolved. The parent represented that the failure was not motivated by tax avoidance or retroactive tax planning and agreed to make any required adjustments. Under IRC § 1362(f), the subsidiary would be treated as continuing to be a QSub during the specified period, provided the parent's S corporation election was valid and the election was not otherwise terminated.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Can an ineffective QSub election be treated as continuing when the failure resulted from procedural defects and was inadvertent?
  • Outcome: Approved.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 1361(b) and 1362(a), (d), and (f).

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201104030
Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 1/28/2011
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Person To Contact:
Index Number: 1362.04-00
--------------------, ID No. -------------
Telephone Number:
---------------------
------------------------------------
Refer Reply To:
--------------------------------------------------------------- CC:PSI:B02
--------------------------------------------------------------- PLR-139579-10
--------------------------------------------------------------- Date:
-----------------------------
October 5, 2010
-------------------------------------
--------------------------

LEGEND

X = ------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------
-----------------------

Y = -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------

State = --------------------

Date 1 = --------- -------

Date 2 = ----------------------

Date 3 = -------------------

Date 4 = --------------------------

Dear -----------:

This responds to a letter dated April 29, 2010, and subsequent correspondence, submitted on behalf of X, requesting a ruling under § 1362(f) of the Internal Revenue Code for an inadvertently ineffective qualified subchapter S subsidiary (QSub) election.

PLR-139579-10
2

The information submitted states that X was incorporated in State on Date 1. X made an election to be treated as an S corporation effective Date 2. On Date 3, Y was incorporated under the laws of State. X had intended to elect to treat Y as a QSub effective Date 3. However, the QSub election was ineffective due to procedural defects. Y dissolved on Date 4.

X represents that the ineffective QSub election was not motivated by tax avoidance or retroactive tax planning. X and its shareholders have agreed to make any adjustments that the Commissioner may require, consistent with the treatment of Y as a QSub.

Section 1362(f) provides that if (1) an election under § 1362(a) by any corporation (A) was not effective for the taxable year for which made (determined without regard to § 1362(b)(2)) by reason of a failure to meet the requirements of § 1361(b) or to obtain shareholder consents or (B) was terminated under § 1362(d)(2) or (3), (2) the Secretary determines that the circumstances resulting in the ineffectiveness or termination were inadvertent, (3) no later than a reasonable period of time after discovery of the circumstances resulting in the ineffectiveness or termination, steps were taken (A) so that the corporation is a small business corporation or (B) to acquire the shareholder consents, and (4) the corporation and each person who was a shareholder of the corporation at any time during the period specified pursuant to § 1362(f), agrees to make such adjustments (consistent with the treatment of the corporation as an S corporation) as may be required by the Secretary with respect to such period, then, notwithstanding the circumstances resulting in the ineffectiveness or termination, the corporation will be treated as an S corporation during the period specified by the Secretary.

Based solely on the facts submitted and the representations made, we conclude that X’s ineffective election for Y to be a QSub on Date 3 was inadvertent within the meaning of § 1362(f). Consequently, we rule that, pursuant to the provisions of § 1362(f), Y will be treated as continuing to be a QSub from Date 3 until Date 4 provided X’s S corporation election was valid and provided that the election was not otherwise terminated.

Except as specifically ruled above, we express no opinion concerning the federal tax consequences of the transactions described above under any other provisions of the Code. Specifically, we express no opinion as to whether Y is otherwise eligible to be treated as a QSub.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer that requested it. Section 6110(j)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

PLR-139579-10
3

Pursuant to a power of attorney on file, a copy of this letter is being sent to X’s authorized representatives.

Sincerely,

Charlotte Chyr
Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 2
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs & Special Industries)

Enclosures (2):
Copy of this letter
Copy for § 6110 purposes

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace