CCA 201103040: Counsel addresses filing dates and the penalty for frivolous tax submissions

Number
201103040
Outcome
Advice
Document type
Chief Counsel Advice
IRS subject
What Constitutes
Code sections
§ 6702, § 7502
Ruling dated
December 16, 2010
Publicly released
January 21, 2011

Apply this to your situation

This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2011, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2011
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It is advice from the IRS Office of Chief Counsel to IRS personnel on the facts they presented, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Chief Counsel responded to questions about a Form 843 request for penalty abatement and the section 6702 frivolous-submission penalty. The advice states that section 7502 does not apply because no limitations period applies to the Form 843 abatement request, so the form is treated as filed when the IRS receives it. It also explains that the increased section 6702 penalty took effect on March 15, 2007, and should not apply if the taxpayer mailed the form before the IRS issued its first list of frivolous positions. The advice further concludes that the 2006 authority allowing the Secretary to reduce the penalty would not apply on those facts and that no limitations period applies when only a purported return, rather than an actual return, is filed.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: When were a Form 843 request and the increased section 6702 penalty treated as effective?
  • Outcome: Advice given
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 6702 and 7502; Notice 2007-30; Pub. L. No. 109-432, div. A, title IV, § 407(f)

Full text (IRS public release)

ID: CCA_2010121613373516 Number: 201103040
Release Date: 1/21/2011
Office: --------------
UILC: 6702.01-00

From: ----------------------
Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2010 1:38:15 PM
To: ----------------------
Cc: -----------------------------------
Subject: RE: Sections 7122 6501 6702 intersect question


Please see below our responses to your questions. Our responses are based on the facts you provided and the assumption you asked us to make (that the Form 843 was mailed in -------). But we highly doubt that assumption should be made.

#2—Since no limitations period applies to a request for an abatement of penalties on Form 843, section 7502 does not apply. Thus, the Form 843 will be deemed filed on the date of receipt by the Service (--------------------).

#3—The amendments to section 6702, including the increased amount of the penalty, took effect on March 15, 2007 when the Service first issued a list of frivolous positions. See Notice 2007-30; Pub. L. No. 109-432, Div. A, Title IV, § 407(f). The amended statute imposing a higher penalty applies to “submissions made” after the list came out. If the taxpayer mailed the form in -------, the list did not then exist and we believe it would be inappropriate to apply the higher penalty to the taxpayer.

#4—We note that Congress did not give the Secretary authority to reduce the penalty until the 2006 amendments, which would not apply to this case as explained in #3 above.

#5—Yes, we agree no limitations period applies to the section 6702 penalty when only a purported return, but not an actual return, is filed.

Please let me know if you have any other questions.

-----------------------

--------------

-------------------

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace