Private Letter Ruling 1103033 Released January 21, 2011 Approved

PLR 1103033: IRS treats commodity-linked note income and certain CFC income as qualifying income for RICs

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2011, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2011
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Two investment funds and a related portfolio asked whether income from a commodity-linked structured note would count toward the qualifying-income test for regulated investment companies. They also asked whether subpart F income from wholly owned foreign subsidiaries investing mainly in commodities and related instruments would count as qualifying income. The IRS ruled that income and gain from the note qualifies under section 851(b)(2), based on the note's stated terms and representations. It also ruled that the subsidiaries' subpart F income attributable to the funds is income derived from the funds' business of investing in the subsidiaries' stock and therefore qualifies under section 851(b)(2).

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Do income and gain from a commodity-linked note, and subpart F income from wholly owned CFC subsidiaries, qualify as RIC income?
  • Outcome: Approved
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 851, 951, 952, 954, 957, and 959; Commodity Exchange Act § 2(f); Investment Company Act § 2(a)(36)

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201103033 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 1/21/2011 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 851.00-00
Person To Contact:
------------------------------------------------------ --------------------------, ID No. ----------------
------------------------------------------------------------ -----------------
------------------------------------------------------------ Telephone Number:
----------------------- ---------------------
------------------------------------ Refer Reply To:
------------------------------- CC:FIP:1
-------------------------- PLR-134355-10
Date:
October 12, 2010

Legend:

Fund A = --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Fund B = -------------------------------------------

Trust = --------------------------------------------

State = ----------------------

Portfolio = --------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Date 1 = ---------------

Index = ----------------------------------------------------------------

a = -----------

b = ----

c = ----

d = --

PLR-134355-10 2

e = -----------------------------------------

f = ------------------------------------------------

Subsidiary A = ----------------------------------------------------------------

Subsidiary B = ------------------------------------------------------------

Offshore = ----------------------

Company = --------------------------

Dear ----------------:

   This is in response to a letter dated August 19, 2010, requesting rulings that (1)

income earned from investments in the commodity-linked note described in this letter
constitutes qualifying income to the Funds under section 851(b)(2) of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (“the Code”) and (2) income earned by the Funds
from an investment in wholly-owned subsidiaries that qualify as controlled foreign
corporations (“CFCs”) constitutes qualifying income to the Funds under section
851(b)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code.

Facts:

   Fund A is a series of Trust, a business trust organized under the laws of State.

Trust is registered as an open-end management investment company under the
Investment Company Act of 1940, 15 U.S.C. 80a-1 et seq. (the “1940 Act”). Fund A
invests in Portfolio. Portfolio is organized as a State business trust and is registered as
an open-end management investment company under the 1940 Act.

   Fund B is a business trust organized under the laws of State (together with Fund

A, the “Funds”). Fund B will be registered as a closed-end management investment
company under the 1940 Act. The Funds are accrual method taxpayers whose annual
accounting period ends on Date 1.

  Portfolio is treated as a partnership for federal income tax purposes. Each of the

Funds intends to qualify as a regulated investment company under section 851 of the
Code. Fund A invests or will invest its assets in Portfolio or other entities classified as
partnerships for federal income tax purposes but is also authorized to participate in the
commodity-linked note described below.

Commodities-Linked Note

PLR-134355-10 3

   The Funds and Portfolio intend to invest in a commodity-linked structured note

having the following terms and conditions (the “Note”). The Note will be issued to the
Funds or Portfolio at a face value of $a. The Note’s payout will be determined with
reference to Index. The term of the Note will be b months. The Funds and Portfolio will
have the right to put the Note to the issuer at the calculated redemption price based
upon the closing Index value as of the end of the next business day after notification to
the issuer. If, on any day, Index falls to a level that is c% or less of the beginning Index
value, the Note will “knockout” and automatically redeem at the calculated redemption
price based upon the closing Index as of the end of the next business day.

   The repayment obligation upon early redemption, knockout, or at maturity is

calculated under a formula that provides for an amount equal to the face amount of the
Note plus the product of the face amount, a leverage factor of d, and the adjusted Index
return over the applicable period (which may be positive or negative). The adjusted
Index return means the percentage change in the Index during the applicable period
reduced by an interest rate of e and by certain fees, each expressed as a percentage.
In addition, upon maturity, redemption, or knockout, the issuer will pay any accrued
coupon interest at the coupon rate of f.

    The Funds and Portfolio make the following representations with respect to the

Note:

    (1) the issuer of the Note will receive payment for the Note substantially
        contemporaneously with the delivery of the Note;

    (2) while holding the Note, the Funds and Portfolio will not be required to make
        any additional payments to the issuer of the Note in addition to the purchase
        price paid for the Note, whether as margin, settlement payment, or otherwise,
        during the life of the Note or at maturity;

    (3) the issuer of the Note is not subject by the terms of the Note to mark-to-
        market margining requirements of the Commodities Exchange Act, 7 U.S.C.
        2, as amended (the “CEA”); and

    (4) the Note is not marketed as a contract of sale of a commodity for future
        delivery (or option for future delivery on such a contract) subject to the CEA.

Controlled Foreign Corporation

   Fund B and Portfolio each have formed or intend to form a wholly-owned

subsidiary. Portfolio has formed Subsidiary A. Fund B intends to form Subsidiary B
(together with Subsidiary A, the “Subsidiaries” and each is a “Subsidiary”). The
Subsidiaries are or will be formed under the laws of Offshore, a non-U.S. jurisdiction.
Each Subsidiary will be formed as a Company. A Company provides limited liability for

PLR-134355-10 4

its shareholders. Each Subsidiary intends to file an election on Form 8832 to be treated
as a corporation for federal income tax purposes under section 301.7701-3 of the
Procedure and Administration Regulations.

   Both Fund B and Portfolio represent that although Subsidiaries do not expect to

be registered as investment companies under the 1940 Act, they will comply with the
requirements of section 18(f) of the 1940 Act, Investment Company Act Release No.
10666, and related Securities and Exchange Commission guidance pertaining to asset
coverage with respect to investments that would apply if Subsidiaries were registered
under the 1940 Act.

   Fund B and Portfolio each may invest a portion of their assets in a Subsidiary,

subject to the asset diversification limitations set forth in section 851(b)(3) of the Code.
The Subsidiaries are expected to invest primarily in commodities and commodities-
related investments but may also invest in other securities. It is expected that all of the
Subsidiaries’ income will be subpart F income within the meaning of section 952 of the
Code.

Law and Analysis:

    Section 851(b)(2) provides that a corporation shall not be considered a RIC for

any taxable year unless it meets an income test. Under this test, at least 90 percent of
its gross income must be derived from certain enumerated sources. Section 851(b)(2)
defines qualifying income, in relevant part, as –

   dividends, interest, payments with respect to securities loans (as defined
   in section 512(a)(5)), and gains from the sale or other disposition of stock
   or securities (as defined in section 2(a)(36) of the 1940 Act) or foreign
   currencies, or other income (including but not limited to gains from
   options, futures or forward contracts) derived with respect to [the RIC’s]
   business of investing in such stock, securities, or currencies . . . .

   Section 2(a)(36) of the 1940 Act defines the term “security” as –

   any note, stock, treasury stock, security future, bond, debenture, evidence
   of indebtedness, certificate of interest or participation in any profit-sharing
   agreement, collateral-trust certificate, preorganization certificate or
   subscription, transferable share, investment contract, voting-trust
   certificate, certificate of deposit for a security, fractional undivided interest
   in oil, gas, or other mineral rights, any put, call, straddle, option, or
   privilege on any security (including a certificate of deposit) or on any group
   or index of securities (including any interest therein or based on the value
   thereof), or any put, call, straddle, option, or privilege entered into on a
   national securities exchange relating to foreign currency, or, in general,

PLR-134355-10 5

   any interest or instrument commonly known as a “security”, or any
   certificate of interest or participation in, temporary or interim certificate for,
   receipt for, guarantee of, or warrant or right to subscribe to or purchase,
   any of the foregoing.

   Section 2(f)(1) of the CEA provides that the CEA is not applicable to a hybrid

instrument that is predominantly a security. Section 2(f)(2) of the CEA provides that a
hybrid instrument shall be considered to be predominantly a security if –

          (A) the issuer of the hybrid instrument receives payment in full of
   the purchase price of the hybrid instrument, substantially
   contemporaneously with the delivery of the hybrid instrument;

         (B) the purchaser or holder of the hybrid instrument is not required
   to make any payment to the issuer in addition to the purchase price paid
   under subparagraph (A), whether as margin, settlement payment, or
   otherwise, during the life of the hybrid instrument or at maturity;

          (C) the issuer of the hybrid instrument is not subject by the terms of
   the instrument to mark-to-market margining requirements; and

        (D) the hybrid instrument is not marketed as a contract of sale of a
   commodity for future delivery (or option on such a contract) subject to the
   CEA.

   Section 2(f)(3) of the CEA provides that for purposes of section 2(f)(2)(C) of the

CEA, mark-to-market margining requirements do not include the obligation of an issuer
of a secured debt instrument to increase the amount of collateral held in pledge for the
benefit of the purchaser of the secured debt instrument to secure the repayment
obligations of the issuer under the secured debt instrument.

   In addition, the flush language of section 851(b) of the Code provides that, for

purposes of section 851(b)(2), there shall be treated as dividends amounts included in
gross income under section 951(a)(1)(A)(i) or 1293(a) for the taxable year to the extent
that, under section 959(a)(1) or 1293(c) (as the case may be), there is a distribution out
of the earnings and profits of the taxable year which are attributable to the amounts so
included.

   Section 957 defines a controlled foreign corporation (CFC) as any foreign

corporation in which more than 50 percent of (1) the total combined voting power of all
classes of stock entitled to vote, or (2) the total value of the stock is owned by United
States shareholders on any day during the corporation’s taxable year. A United States
shareholder is defined in section 951(b) as a United States person who owns 10
percent or more of the total combined voting power of all classes of voting stock of a

PLR-134355-10 6

foreign corporation. Fund B and Portfolio each represent that it will own 100 percent of
the voting power of the stock of its respective Subsidiary. Fund B and Portfolio each is
a United States person. Fund B and Portfolio therefore represent that the Subsidiaries
will qualify as CFCs under these provisions.

   Section 951(a)(1) provides that, if a foreign corporation is a CFC for an

uninterrupted period of 30 days or more during any taxable year, every person who is a
United States shareholder of this corporation and who owns stock in this corporation on
the last day of the taxable year in which the corporation is a CFC shall include in gross
income the sum of the shareholder’s pro rata share of the CFC’s subpart F income for
the taxable year.

   Section 952(a)(2) defines subpart F income to include foreign base company

income determined under section 954. Under section 954(a)(1), foreign base company
income includes foreign personal holding company income determined under section
954(c). Under section 954(c)(1), foreign personal holding company income includes
(among other things): dividends, interest, royalties, rents, and annuities; gains in excess
of losses from transactions in commodities (including futures, forward, and similar
transactions but excluding certain hedging transactions and certain active business
gains and losses); and, subject to certain exceptions, net income from notional principal
contracts.

    Subsidiaries’ income from their investments in commodities and commodity-

linked instruments may generate subpart F income. Fund B and Portfolio therefore
represent that they will include in income their respective Subsidiary’s subpart F income
for the taxable year in accordance with section 951.

Conclusion

  Based on the facts as represented, we rule that income and gain arising from the

Note constitutes qualifying income to the Funds under section 851(b)(2) of the Code.
We further rule that subpart F income of the Subsidiaries attributable to the Funds is
income derived with respect to each Fund’s business of investing in the stock of its
Subsidiary and thus constitutes qualifying income under section 851(b)(2).

   This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it, and is limited to the

facts as represented by the taxpayer. Section 6110(k)(3) provides that this letter may
not be used or cited as precedent.

PLR-134355-10 7

     In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this

letter is being sent to your authorized representative.

                                               Sincerely,



                                               Diana Imholtz_____________
                                               Diana Imholtz
                                               Chief, Branch 1
                                               Office of Associate Chief Counsel
                                               (Financial Institutions and Products)

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2011, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.