PLR 1103019: Commodities-linked note income qualifies for regulated investment company income testing
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2011, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Several regulated investment companies asked whether income and gains from specified commodities-linked notes would count as qualifying income under section 851(b)(2). The notes paid coupon interest and had redemption values linked to a commodities total-return index, with terms represented to satisfy the conditions for a hybrid instrument that is predominantly a security. The IRS ruled that income and gain from the notes would be qualifying income for each fund. It did not rule on whether the funds otherwise qualified as regulated investment companies.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Would income and gain from the described commodities-linked notes qualify under the regulated investment company income test?
- Outcome: Approved
- Key authorities: IRC § 851(b)(2); Investment Company Act § 2(a)(36); Commodities Exchange Act § 2(f)
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 201103019
Release Date: 1/21/2011
Index Number: 851.02-00
Person To Contact:
-------------------- ----------------------, ID No. -------------
----------------------------- Telephone Number:
---------------------------------- ---------------------
------------------------------------------- Refer Reply To:
---------------------------- CC:FIP:B02
-------------- PLR-122999-10
---------------------------------------- Date:
October 14, 2010
Legend:
Fund = -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 ----------------------
Fund = -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------
Fund = -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------
Fund = -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------
Fund = -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------
Fund = -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------
Trust = --------------------
1
Trust = ------------------------------------------------
2
Date = ------------------
1
Date = -------------------
2
Date = -------------------
3
Index = -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
a = ---------
b = -------------------------------
c = ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
d = ----
e = --
f = -----------------------------------------
g = ------
Dear -------------:
This responds to the request dated May 28, 2010 submitted by your authorized
representative on behalf of Fund 1, Fund 2, Fund 3, Fund 4, Fund 5, and Fund 6 (each
a “Fund,” and collectively the “Funds”). The Funds request that the Internal Revenue
Service rule that income and gain from the commodities-linked notes described in this
letter constitute qualifying income to the Funds under section 851(b)(2) of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (“the Code”).
Facts:
Fund 1, Fund 2, Fund 3, Fund 4, and Fund 5 are series of Trust 1, and Fund 6 is
a series of Trust 2. Trust 1 and Trust 2 are business trusts organized under the laws of
State and open-end management investment companies registered under the
Investment Company Act of 1940, 15 U.S.C. 80a-1 et seq., as amended (the “1940
Act”). Each Fund qualifies as a regulated investment company (RIC) under section
851(a) of the Code. Each Fund uses an accrual method of accounting and has an
annual accounting period ending on Date 1.
The Funds intend to invest in commodities-linked notes, each having the
following terms and conditions (the “Note”). The Note will be issued at its par value of
PLR-122999-10 3
$a. The term of the Note will be b. The Note will pay monthly coupon interest at a rate
equal to c. The Note’s payout will be determined by reference to Index, a total return
index. Each Fund, as holder of a Note, will have the right to put the Note to the issuer
on any day before Date 2 at the redemption price based on the settlement price of Index
on the next business day after notification to the issuer, or the same day if such
notification is made by a specified hour. If on any day the settlement price of Index falls
to a level that is d% or less of the initial value, the Note will “knockout” and automatically
redeem at the redemption price based on the settlement price of Index on the next
business day. If the Note has not been redeemed by Date 2, the Note will mature on
Date 3 and the holder will receive the redemption price based on the settlement price of
Index on Date 2.
The Note’s redemption price upon maturity, redemption, or knockout is
determined under a formula that provides for a return of the Note’s face amount plus the
product of the face amount, a leverage factor, and the adjusted Index return over the
applicable period (which product may be positive or negative). The Note will have a
leverage factor of e. The adjusted Index return means the change in the Index during the
applicable period (expressed as a portion of the starting value of Index) reduced by an
interest rate factor based on f and by fees equal to g% per annum. In addition to the
redemption price described above, upon maturity, redemption, or knockout, the issuer
will pay any coupon interest accrued since the most recent interest payment date.
The Funds make the following representations with respect to the Note:
(1) the issuer of the Note will receive payment in full of the purchase price of the
Note from each Fund substantially contemporaneously with the delivery of
the Note to such Fund;
(2) the Funds will not be required to make any payments to the issuer in addition
to the purchase price, whether as margin, settlement payment, or otherwise,
during the life of the Note or at maturity;
(3) the issuer of the Note is not subject by the terms of the Note to mark-to-
market margining requirements of the Commodities Exchange Act, 7 U.S.C.
2, as amended (the “CEA”); and
(4) the Note is not marketed as a contract of sale of a commodity for future
delivery (or option on such a contract) subject to the CEA.
Law and Analysis:
Section 851(b)(2) provides that a corporation shall not be considered a RIC for
any taxable year unless it meets an income test. Under this test, at least 90 percent of
its gross income must be qualifying income derived from certain enumerated sources.
Under § 851(b)(2), a corporation’s qualifying income includes –
PLR-122999-10 4
dividends, interest, payments with respect to securities loans (as defined
in section 512(a)(5)), and gains from the sale or other disposition of stock
or securities (as defined in section 2(a)(36) of [the 1940 Act]) or foreign
currencies, or other income (including but not limited to gains from
options, futures or forward contracts) derived with respect to its business
of investing in such stock, securities, or currencies . . . .
Section 2(a)(36) of the 1940 Act defines the term “security” as –
any note, stock, treasury stock, security future, bond, debenture, evidence
of indebtedness, certificate of interest or participation in any profit-sharing
agreement, collateral-trust certificate, preorganization certificate or
subscription, transferable share, investment contract, voting-trust
certificate, certificate of deposit for a security, fractional undivided
interest in oil, gas, or other mineral rights, any put, call, straddle, option,
or privilege on any security (including a certificate of deposit) or on any
group or index of securities (including any interest therein or based on the
value thereof), or any put, call, straddle, option, or privilege entered into
on a national securities exchange relating to foreign currency, or, in general,
any interest or instrument commonly known as a “security”, or any certificate
of interest or participation in, temporary or interim certificate for, receipt
for, guarantee of, or warrant or right to subscribe to or purchase, any of the
foregoing.
Section 2(f)(1) of the CEA provides that the CEA is not applicable to a hybrid
instrument that is predominantly a security. Section 2(f)(2) of the CEA provides that a
hybrid instrument shall be considered to be predominantly a security if –
(A) the issuer of the hybrid instrument receives payment in full of the
purchase price of the hybrid instrument, substantially
contemporaneously with the delivery of the hybrid instrument;
(B) the purchaser or holder of the hybrid instrument is not required to
make any payment to the issuer in addition to the purchase price paid
under subparagraph (A), whether as margin, settlement payment, or
otherwise, during the life of the hybrid instrument or at maturity;
(C) the issuer of the hybrid instrument is not subject by the terms of the
instrument to mark-to-market margining requirements; and
(D) the hybrid instrument is not marketed as a contract of sale of a
commodity for future delivery (or option on such a contract) subject to
the CEA.
PLR-122999-10 5
Section 2(f)(3) of the CEA provides that for purposes of section 2(f)(2)(C) of the
CEA, mark-to-market margining requirements do not include the obligation of an issuer
of a secured debt instrument to increase the amount of collateral held in pledge for the
benefit of the purchaser of the secured debt instrument to secure the repayment
obligations of the issuer under the secured debt instrument.
Conclusion:
Based on the facts as represented, we rule that income and gain arising from the
Note constitute qualifying income to each of the Funds under section 851(b)(2) of the
Code.
Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied
concerning the tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or
referenced in this letter. In particular, no opinion is expressed with regard to whether the
Funds qualify as RICs under subchapter M of the Code.
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayers who requested it, and is limited to the
facts as represented by the taxpayers. Section 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be
used or cited as precedent.
In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this
letter is being sent to your authorized representative.
Sincerely,
David B. Silber
David B. Silber
Chief, Branch 2
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(Financial Institutions and Products)
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2011, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.