Private Letter Ruling 1102055 Released January 14, 2011 Approved

PLR 1102055: Commodity-linked note and CFC income qualify as regulated investment company income

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2011, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2011
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A regulated investment company asked whether income from a commodity-linked note would count toward the qualifying-income test and whether income from a wholly owned controlled foreign corporation would also qualify. The IRS ruled that income and gain from the note qualified under section 851(b)(2). It also ruled that the subsidiary’s subpart F income attributable to the taxpayer qualified as income derived from the taxpayer’s business of investing in the subsidiary’s stock. The ruling was limited to the taxpayer’s stated facts and did not determine whether the taxpayer qualified as a RIC under every other Subchapter M requirement.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Does income from the commodity-linked note and the CFC’s subpart F income satisfy the RIC qualifying-income test?
  • Outcome: approved
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 851(b)(2), 951, 952, 954, and 957; Commodity Exchange Act § 2(f); Investment Company Act § 2(a)(36)

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201102055 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 1/14/2011 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Person To Contact:
Index Number: 851.02-00 ----------------, ID No. ------------
Telephone Number:
---------------------
--------------------------- Refer Reply To:
---------------------------------------------- CC:FIP:B02
------------------------------------------------ PLR-129557-10
------------------------ Date:
September 22, 2010

Legend:

Taxpayer = -----------------------------------------------


Corporation = -----------------------------------------------------

Country = ----------------------

Type X Company = --------------------------

Date 1 = ---------------

Index = ----------------------------------------------------------------

a = ---------------

b = ------------------------------

c = ----

d = --------------------------------------------

e = --

f = --------

g = ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------


h = ----
PLR-129557-10 2

Dear --------------------:

   This is in response to a letter dated July 13, 2010, and subsequent

correspondence, requesting rulings that (1) income from the commodity-linked note
described in this letter constitutes qualifying income under section 851(b)(2) of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (“the Code”), and (2) income earned by
Taxpayer from an investment in its wholly-owned subsidiary that qualifies as a
controlled foreign corporation (“CFC”) constitutes qualifying income under section
851(b)(2) of the Code.

Facts:

   Taxpayer is a series of Corporation. Corporation is registered as an open-end

management investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, 15
U.S.C. 80a-1 et seq., as amended (the “1940 Act”), and its securities are registered
under the Securities Act of 1933. Taxpayer intends to elect and qualify as a regulated
investment company (“RIC”) under Subchapter M of the Code. Taxpayer uses an
accrual method of accounting and a fiscal year ending Date 1.

Commodities-linked Note

    Taxpayer intends to invest in a commodities-linked note having the following

terms and conditions (the “Note”). The Note will be issued at its par value of $a. Its
payout formula will be determined with reference to Index. The term of the Note will be
b. Taxpayer, as holder of the Note, will have the right to put the Note to the issuer at
the calculated redemption price based upon the closing Index value as of the end of the
next business day after notification to the issuer, or as of the same day closing value if
notice is made by ten o’clock in the morning, Eastern Standard time. In addition, if the
Index value falls to a level that is equal to or less than c% of the initial Index value on
any day, the Note will “knockout” and automatically redeem at the calculated
redemption price based upon the closing Index level on the following trading day. A
trading day is a day on which the relevant exchanges for all Index constituents are open
for trading during their regular trading sessions.

   The Note will pay a monthly coupon in arrears. The coupon for each coupon

period will be based on d. In the case of a mandatory prepayment event or an early
redemption at the option of the holder or issuer (each, an early redemption event),
Taxpayer will receive the accrued coupon on the applicable early redemption event
maturity date.
PLR-129557-10 3

    The repayment obligation upon early redemption, knockout, or at maturity is

calculated under a formula that provides for an amount equal to the face amount of the
Note, plus or minus an adjustment. The adjustment is calculated by multiplying the face
amount of the Note by a leverage factor of e times the Index return. The Index return is
the percentage of the increase or decrease of the initial Index level compared to the
closing Index level for the applicable period decreased by an adjustment factor (greater
of f or g) based on the number of days the Note is outstanding. The Index return will
also include an adjustment for the reversal of the interest rate factor included in the total
return computation.

   Taxpayer makes the following representations with respect to the Note:

  (1) The issuer of the Note will receive payment for the Note substantially

contemporaneously with the delivery of the Note;

   (2) While holding the Note, Taxpayer will not be required to make any additional

payments to the issuer of the Note in addition to the purchase price paid for the Note,
whether as margin, settlement payment, or otherwise, during the life of the Note or at
maturity;

  (3) The issuer of the Note is not subject by the terms of the Note to mark-to-

market margining requirements of the Commodities Exchange Act, 7 U.S.C. 2, as
amended (the “CEA”); and

   (4) The Note is not marketed as a contract of sale of a commodity for future

delivery (or option on such a contract) subject to the CEA.

Controlled Foreign Corporation

   Corporation intends to form a wholly-owned subsidiary of Taxpayer

(“Subsidiary”) incorporated as a Type X Company under the laws of Country. Under the
laws of Country, a Type X Company provides for limited liability for all holders of shares.
A shareholder's liability is limited to the amount, if any, unpaid with respect to the shares
acquired by the shareholder. Subsidiary will file an election on Form 8832, Entity
Classification Election, to be taxed as a corporation pursuant to § 301.7701-3 of the
Procedure and Administration Regulations.

   Taxpayer represents that, although Subsidiary will not be registered as an

investment company under the 1940 Act, Subsidiary will comply with the requirements
of section 18(f) of the 1940 Act, Investment Company Act Release No. 10666, and
related SEC guidance pertaining to asset coverage with respect to commodity futures
and other transactions in derivatives.
PLR-129557-10 4

   Taxpayer may invest up to h% of its total assets in Subsidiary, subject to the

diversification limitations set forth in section 851(b)(3) of the Code. Subsidiary is
expected to invest primarily in commodity-linked derivative instruments, including swap
agreements, commodity options, futures, and options on futures. Subsidiary will also
invest in fixed income instruments, some of which are intended to serve as margin or
collateral for its derivatives positions.

    Subsidiary may invest in derivative instruments linked to the value of a particular

commodity or commodity futures contracts, or a subset of commodities or commodity
futures contracts, including swaps on commodity futures. Subsidiary’s investments in
commodity-linked derivative instruments may specify exposure to commodity futures
with different roll dates, reset dates, or contract months than those specified by a
particular commodity index.

   Taxpayer represents that Subsidiary will be a CFC within the meaning of section

957 of the Code. It is expected that all of the income of Subsidiary will be “subpart F
income” within the meaning of section 952.

Law and Analysis

   Section 851(b)(2) of the Code provides that a corporation shall not be considered

a RIC for any taxable year unless it meets an income test (the “qualifying income
requirement”). Under this test, at least 90 percent of its gross income must be derived
from certain enumerated sources. A corporation that is a partner in a partnership (other
than a qualified publicly traded partnership) must look through such partnership for
purposes of meeting the qualifying income requirement. Section 851(b)(2) defines
qualifying income, in relevant part, as —

   dividends, interest, payments with respect to securities loans (as defined in
   section 512(a)(5)), and gains from the sale or other disposition of stock or
   securities (as defined in section 2(a)(36) of the 1940 Act) or foreign currencies, or
   other income (including but not limited to gains from options, futures or forward
   contracts) derived with respect to [the RIC's] business of investing in such stock,
   securities, or currencies. . . .

   Section 2(a)(36) of the 1940 Act defines the term "security" as —

   any note, stock, treasury stock, security future, bond, debenture, evidence of
   indebtedness, certificate of interest or participation in any profit-sharing
   agreement, collateral-trust certificate, preorganization certificate or subscription,
   transferable share, investment contract, voting-trust certificate, certificate of
   deposit for a security, fractional undivided interest in oil, gas, or other mineral
   rights, any put, call, straddle, option, or privilege on any security (including a
   certificate of deposit) or on any group or index of securities (including any interest

PLR-129557-10 5

   therein or based on the value thereof), or any put, call, straddle, option, or
   privilege entered into on a national securities exchange relating to foreign
   currency, or, in general, any interest or instrument commonly known as a
   "security", or any certificate of interest or participation in, temporary or interim
   certificate for, receipt for, guarantee of, or warrant or right to subscribe to or
   purchase, any of the foregoing.

   Section 2(f)(1) of the CEA provides that the CEA is not applicable to a hybrid

instrument that is predominantly a security. Section 2(f)(2) of the CEA provides that a
hybrid instrument shall be considered to be predominantly a security if —

   (A) the issuer of the hybrid instrument receives payment in full of the purchase

price of the hybrid instrument, substantially contemporaneously with the delivery of the
hybrid instrument;

   (B) the purchaser or holder of the hybrid instrument is not required to make any

payment to the issuer in addition to the purchase price paid under subparagraph (A),
whether as margin, settlement payment, or otherwise, during the life of the hybrid
instrument or at maturity;

   (C) the issuer of the hybrid instrument is not subject by the terms of the

instrument to mark-to-market margining requirements; and

   (D) the hybrid instrument is not marketed as a contract of sale of a commodity for

future delivery (or option on such a contract) subject to the CEA.

    Section 2(f)(3) of the CEA provides, in part, that for purposes of section 2(f)(2)(C)

of the CEA, mark-to-market margining requirements do not include the obligation of an
issuer of a secured debt instrument to increase the amount of collateral held in pledge
for the benefit of the purchaser of the secured debt instrument to secure the repayment
obligations of the issuer under the secured debt instrument.

   In addition, the flush language of section 851(b) of the Code provides that, for

purposes of section 851(b)(2), there shall be treated as dividends amounts included in
gross income under section 951(a)(1)(A)(i) or 1293(a) for the taxable year to the extent
that, under section 959(a)(1) or 1293(c) (as the case may be), there is a distribution out
of the earnings and profits of the taxable year which are attributable to the amounts so
included.

   Section 957 of the Code defines a CFC as any foreign corporation in which more

than 50 percent of (1) the total combined voting power of all classes of stock entitled to
vote, or (2) the total value of the stock is owned by United States shareholders on any
day during the corporation's taxable year. A United States shareholder is defined in
section 951(b) as a United States person who owns 10 percent or more of the total
PLR-129557-10 6

combined voting power of all classes of voting stock of a foreign corporation. Taxpayer
represents that 100 percent of the voting power of the stock of Subsidiary will be owned
by Taxpayer and that Taxpayer is a United States person. Taxpayer therefore
represents that Subsidiary will qualify as a CFC under these provisions.

    Section 951(a)(1) of the Code provides that, if a foreign corporation is a CFC for

an uninterrupted period of 30 days or more during any taxable year, every person who
is a United States shareholder of this corporation and who owns stock in this
corporation on the last day of the taxable year in which the corporation is a CFC shall
include in gross income the shareholder's pro rata share of the CFC's subpart F income
for the taxable year.

   Section 952(a)(2) of the Code defines subpart F income to include foreign base

company income determined under section 954. Under section 954(a)(1), foreign base
company income includes foreign personal holding company income determined under
section 954(c). Under section 954(c)(1), foreign personal holding company income
includes (among other things): dividends, interest, royalties, rents, and annuities; gains
in excess of losses from transactions in commodities (including futures, forward, and
similar transactions but excluding certain hedging transactions and certain active
business gains and losses); and, subject to certain exceptions, net income from notional
principal contracts.

   Subsidiary’s investments may generate foreign personal holding company

income under section 954(c), which is subpart F income. Taxpayer will therefore
include in income its pro rata share of Subsidiary’s subpart F income for the taxable
year in accordance with section 951.

Conclusion

   Based on the facts as represented, we rule that income and gain arising from the

Note constitutes qualifying income to Taxpayer under section 851(b)(2) of the Code.
We further rule that subpart F income of Subsidiary attributable to Taxpayer is income
derived with respect to Taxpayer’s businesses of investing in the stock of Subsidiary
and thus constitutes qualifying income to Taxpayer under section 851(b)(2).

   Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied

concerning the tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or
referenced in this letter. In particular, no opinion is expressed with regard to whether
Taxpayer qualifies as a RIC under subchapter M of the Code.

   This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it, and is limited to the facts

as represented by the taxpayer. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not
be used or cited as precedent.
PLR-129557-10 7

     In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this

letter is being sent to your authorized representative.

                                   Sincerely,


                                   David B. Silber
                                   David B. Silber
                                   Chief, Branch 2
                                   Office of Associate Chief Counsel
                                   (Financial Institutions & Products)

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2011, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.