CCA 201052009: The IRS could request a waiver of the erroneous-refund limitations period

Number
201052009
Outcome
Advice
Document type
Chief Counsel Advice
IRS subject
Periods of Limitation on Suits (Barred v. Not Barred)
Code sections
§ 6532
Ruling dated
June 9, 2010
Publicly released
December 30, 2010

Apply this to your situation

This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2010, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2010
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It is advice from the IRS Office of Chief Counsel to IRS personnel on the facts they presented, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Chief Counsel Advice considered whether a taxpayer could waive the general limitations period in IRC § 6532(b) for an IRS suit to recover an erroneous refund. It explains that, although the statute does not expressly authorize waivers, case law supports a valid waiver, including a waiver in a closing agreement. The advice states that a closing agreement may not be necessary if an agreement extending the time to sue is otherwise effective. Because the taxpayer had agreed to return the erroneous refund and the IRS had limited time, the advice concluded that requesting a waiver was appropriate.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the IRS request a waiver of the two-year limitations period for recovering an erroneous refund?
  • Outcome: Advice given
  • Key authorities: IRC § 6532(b); United States v. National Steel Corp., 75 F.3d 1146 (7th Cir. 1996); United States v. Goertz, No. A-09-CV-179 LY, 2009 WL 1664085 (W.D. Tex. June 11, 2009)

Full text (IRS public release)

ID: CCA_2010060909441233 Number: 201052009
Release Date: 12/30/2010
Office: ----------------------------
UILC: 6532.00-00

From: --------------------
Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2010 9:44:14 AM
To: -----------------------
Cc:
Subject: Waiver of 6532(b) Limitations Period

You requested our view regarding a taxpayer’s ability to waive the general limitations period under I.R.C. § 6532(b) on suits brought by the Service to recover erroneous refunds. Although there is no express statutory authorization for such waivers, there is case law available that provides that the execution of a waiver is valid even in the absence of statutory authorization. United States v. National Steel Corp., 75 F.3d 1146 (7th Cir. 1996)(applying a waiver made by the taxpayer in a closing agreement with the Service to extend the general two year statute of limitations).

In later guidance the Service interpreted this opinion as correct and controlling. See CCA 199914033. Additionally, in SCA 200014033 the Service offered guidance on when such waivers should be requested. Waivers should be requested only in limited circumstances, such as where a taxpayer agrees to pay the erroneous refund but needs additional time. Furthermore, it appears to be unnecessary to go through the formality of entering into a closing agreement with the taxpayer in order to have an effective waiver. In a recent case, the court found an “Agreement to Extend the Time to Bring Suit to Recover Erroneous Refund” effective to waive the general limitations period under section 6532(b). United States v. Goertz, No. A-09-CV-179 LY, 2009 WL 1664085 (W.D. Tex. June 11, 2009).

In conclusion, given that the taxpayer has agreed to return the erroneous refund and we are operating on a limited time frame, this appears to be one of the limited circumstances under which a request for waiver is indeed appropriate.

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace