CCA 201052009: The IRS could request a waiver of the erroneous-refund limitations period
Apply this to your situation
This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2010, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Chief Counsel Advice considered whether a taxpayer could waive the general limitations period in IRC § 6532(b) for an IRS suit to recover an erroneous refund. It explains that, although the statute does not expressly authorize waivers, case law supports a valid waiver, including a waiver in a closing agreement. The advice states that a closing agreement may not be necessary if an agreement extending the time to sue is otherwise effective. Because the taxpayer had agreed to return the erroneous refund and the IRS had limited time, the advice concluded that requesting a waiver was appropriate.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Could the IRS request a waiver of the two-year limitations period for recovering an erroneous refund?
- Outcome: Advice given
- Key authorities: IRC § 6532(b); United States v. National Steel Corp., 75 F.3d 1146 (7th Cir. 1996); United States v. Goertz, No. A-09-CV-179 LY, 2009 WL 1664085 (W.D. Tex. June 11, 2009)
Full text (IRS public release)
ID: CCA_2010060909441233 Number: 201052009
Release Date: 12/30/2010
Office: ----------------------------
UILC: 6532.00-00
From: --------------------
Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2010 9:44:14 AM
To: -----------------------
Cc:
Subject: Waiver of 6532(b) Limitations Period
You requested our view regarding a taxpayer’s ability to waive the general limitations period under I.R.C. § 6532(b) on suits brought by the Service to recover erroneous refunds. Although there is no express statutory authorization for such waivers, there is case law available that provides that the execution of a waiver is valid even in the absence of statutory authorization. United States v. National Steel Corp., 75 F.3d 1146 (7th Cir. 1996)(applying a waiver made by the taxpayer in a closing agreement with the Service to extend the general two year statute of limitations).
In later guidance the Service interpreted this opinion as correct and controlling. See CCA 199914033. Additionally, in SCA 200014033 the Service offered guidance on when such waivers should be requested. Waivers should be requested only in limited circumstances, such as where a taxpayer agrees to pay the erroneous refund but needs additional time. Furthermore, it appears to be unnecessary to go through the formality of entering into a closing agreement with the taxpayer in order to have an effective waiver. In a recent case, the court found an “Agreement to Extend the Time to Bring Suit to Recover Erroneous Refund” effective to waive the general limitations period under section 6532(b). United States v. Goertz, No. A-09-CV-179 LY, 2009 WL 1664085 (W.D. Tex. June 11, 2009).
In conclusion, given that the taxpayer has agreed to return the erroneous refund and we are operating on a limited time frame, this appears to be one of the limited circumstances under which a request for waiver is indeed appropriate.
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace