CCA 201050029: Joint-return information may be disclosed while liability remains unresolved

Number
201050029
Outcome
Advice
Document type
Chief Counsel Advice
IRS subject
Disclosure to Persons Having Material Interest; Disclosure to Federal Employees for Tax Administration Purposes
Code sections
§ 6103
Ruling dated
November 5, 2010
Publicly released
December 17, 2010

Apply this to your situation

This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2010, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2010
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It is advice from the IRS Office of Chief Counsel to IRS personnel on the facts they presented, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Chief Counsel Advice considered whether the IRS could disclose a purported joint return and related return information to one spouse when that spouse claimed not to have signed the return. The advice stated that IRC § 6103(e)(1)(B) and § 6103(e)(7) authorize disclosure to either individual for whom the return was filed. Because there had not been a final determination of the spouse's liability arising from the purported joint return, the advice concluded that the spouse remained an individual with respect to whom the return was filed. It also identified possible disclosure authority under IRC § 6103(h)(4) for tax-administration proceedings.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May the IRS disclose a purported joint return and related return information to a spouse who denies signing it?
  • Outcome: Advice given
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 6103(e)(1)(B), 6103(e)(7), and 6103(h)(4)

Full text (IRS public release)

ID: CCA_2010110509502935 Number: 201050029
Release Date: 12/17/2010
Office:
UILC: 6103.05-00, 6103.08-00

From: ------------------
Sent: Friday, November 05, 2010 9:50:31 AM
To: --------------
Cc:
Subject: Your Inquiry

As a starting point, sections 6103(e)(1)(B) and 6103(e)(7) authorize the disclosure of a joint return, and return information relating thereto, to either of the "individuals with respect to whom the return is filed." Your question concerns whether that authority remains viable when one such individual claims not to have signed the purported joint return. I believe it does; because there has been no final determination as to the spouse's tax liability stemming from the purported joint return, the spouse remains an "individual with respect to whom the return is filed."

But there may be other authority as well. You can look to section 6103(h)(4). (Note that there is some overlap between the authorities in sections 6103(e) and (h) with respect to a taxpayer's ability to access his or her own information.) Section 6103(h)(4) establishes disclosure authority in "administrative and judicial proceedings pertaining to tax administration," which include examinations and Appeals consideration. Subsections (A), (B), and (C) set forth the relevant authority for disclosure of return and return information to a taxpayer, either where that taxpayer is a "party to the proceeding" or the "proceeding arose out of, or in connection with, determining the taxpayer's liability" [subpart A], or where either of the third party tests [subparts B and C] apply. As noted above, because there has been no final determination as to the spouse's tax liability stemming from the purported joint return, it strikes me that the spouse remains a party to the matter that is before Appeals. Alternatively, depending on the particular facts, one or more of these other subparts may apply

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace