CCA 201049031: A taxpayer may make a deposit of disputable tax before an audit

Number
201049031
Outcome
Advice
Document type
Chief Counsel Advice
IRS subject
Deposits
Code sections
§ 6603
Ruling dated
October 25, 2010
Publicly released
December 10, 2010

Apply this to your situation

This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2010, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2010
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It is advice from the IRS Office of Chief Counsel to IRS personnel on the facts they presented, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Chief Counsel Advice considers whether the IRS may accept a deposit of disputable tax before the taxpayer has been audited. The advice agrees that there is disputable tax and that the taxpayer should follow the procedures in sections 4.01 and 7.02 of Rev. Proc. 2005-18. It also states that the amount of disputable tax may be easier to identify after the IRS issues a 30-day letter, but it does not say that an audit must occur before the deposit can be accepted.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May the IRS accept a deposit of disputable tax when the taxpayer has not yet been audited?
  • Outcome: advice given
  • Key authorities: IRC § 6603; Rev. Proc. 2005-18, sections 4.01 and 7.02.

Full text (IRS public release)

ID: CCA_2010102511254539 Number: 201049031
Release Date: 12/10/2010
Office: ----------------------------
UILC: 6603.00-00

From: -------------------------
Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 11:52:32 AM
To: ------------------
Cc:
Subject: RE: IRC 6603 & Rev Proc 2005-18

I agree there is a disputable tax and I agree that taxpayer should follow the procedures under section 4.01 and 7.02 of Rev Proc 2005-18.

Perhaps it's because I see so many of these cases, but it would never have occurred to me that any body would be in any doubt about whether we would accept a deposit where the taxpayer has not yet been audited. It's just easier to identify the amount of the disputable tax after the 30 day letter has been issued.

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace