Determination Letter 1046019 Released November 19, 2010 Mixed outcome Transcribed from scan

IRS determination 1046019: conditional waiver of the section 4971 tax after withdrawal of a funding-standard request

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2010, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2010
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The IRS closed a company's request for a waiver of the minimum funding standard after the company withdrew that request. It separately granted a conditional waiver of the 100 percent tax under section 4971(b) for a plan year ending June 30, 2008. The condition was that the pension plan be terminated by the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation. If the termination was not approved, the company could ask the IRS to reopen the withdrawn minimum-funding request. The letter states that the company intended to pursue a distress termination with the PBGC.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: What relief applies after the company's minimum-funding request was withdrawn and the plan's funding deficiency remained?
  • Outcome: Mixed, the request was closed, but a conditional tax waiver was granted
  • Key authorities: IRC § 4971(b); ERISA § 3002(b)

Full text (IRS public release)

Significant Index No. 4971.02-00

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

AUG 25 2010 201046019

GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION

Re:

Company =
Dear ,

This letter constitutes notice that pursuant to your authorized representative’s request of
August 20, 2010,

(1) your request for a waiver of the minimum funding standard for the Plan for the

plan year ending June , 20 , has been withdrawn, and the case has been
closed by this office; and

(2) a waiver of the 100 percent tax under section 4971(b) of the Internal Revenue
Code (“Code”) has been granted for the Plan for the plan year ending
June 30, 2008, on the condition that the Plan is terminated by the Pension
Benefit Guaranty Corporation (“PBGC”). If the termination of the Plan is not
approved, the Company may request that its request for a waiver of the
minimum funding standard for the Plan for the plan year ending June , 20 ,
be re-opened for consideration.

The conditional waiver of the 100 percent tax has been granted in accordance with
section 3002(b) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act. The amount for
which the conditional waiver has been granted is equal to 100 percent of the
accumulated funding deficiency in the funding standard account as of June , 20 ,
the end of the plan year for which the waiver has been granted, to the extent such
funding deficiency has not been corrected.

201046019

In telephone conversations with the Company, the Internal Revenue Service was
informed that the Company would be pursuing a distress termination of the Plan with
the PBGC.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer that requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the
Code provides that it may not be used or cited by others as precedent.

We have sent a copy of this letter to the
to the and to your
authorized representative pursuant to a power of attorney on file in this office.

If you require further assistance in this matter, please contact ,
Sincerely yours,

[illegible signature]

David M. Ziegler, Manager
Employee Plans Actuarial Group 2

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2010, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.