Determination Letter 1045034 Released November 12, 2010 Denied Transcribed from scan

Determination 1045034: final adverse determination denies exemption to an angel investor network

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2010, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2010
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The IRS finalized its denial of federal tax exemption to an organization that operated an angel investor network. The organization connected accredited investors with early-stage businesses, offered access to investment opportunities, and provided related meetings and training. The IRS concluded that these activities primarily served the private investment interests of the members, provided particular services to individuals, and did not promote a common business interest for purposes of section 501(c)(6). The final letter states that donors may not deduct contributions under section 170 and that the organization must file the required federal income tax returns.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Does the angel investor network qualify for exemption under IRC section 501(c)(6)?
  • Outcome: Denied
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 170, 501(c)(6), 6104(c), and 6110

Full text (IRS public release)

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION

Release Number: 201045034 Contact Person:

Release Date: 11/12/10

Date: 8/16/10

UIL Code: 501.06-00
501.06-01 Contact Number:

501.06-02

Identification Number:

Employer Identification Number:
Form Required To Be Filed:

Tax Years:

Dear

This is our final determination that you do not qualify for exemption from Federal income tax as
an organization described in Internal Revenue Code section 501(c)(3). Recently, we sent you a
letter in response to your application that proposed an adverse determination. The letter
explained the facts, law and rationale, and gave you 30 days to file a protest. Since we did not
receive a protest within the requisite 30 days, the proposed adverse determination is now final.

Since you do not qualify for exemption as an organization described in Code section 501(c)(3),
donors may not deduct contributions to you under Code section 170. You must file Federal
income tax returns on the form and for the years listed above within 30 days of this letter, unless

you request an extension of time to file.

We will make this letter and our proposed adverse determination letter available for public
inspection under Code section 6110, after deleting certain identifying information. Please read
the enclosed Notice 437, Notice of Intention to Disclose, and review the two attached letters that
show our proposed deletions. If you disagree with our proposed deletions, you should follow
the instructions in Notice 437. If you agree with our deletions, you do not need to take any

further action.

In accordance with Code section 6104(c), we will notify the appropriate State officials of our
determination by sending them a copy of this final letter and the proposed adverse letter. You
should contact your State officials if you have any questions about how this determination may
affect your State responsibilities and requirements.

Letter 4038(CG) (11-2005)
Catalog Number 47632S

2

If you have any questions about this letter, please contact the person whose name and
telephone number are shown in the heading of this letter. If you have any questions about your
Federal income tax status and responsibilities, please contact IRS Customer Service at
1-800-829-1040 or the IRS Customer Service number for businesses, 1-800-829-4933. The
IRS Customer Service number for people with hearing impairments is 1-800-829-4059.

Sincerely,

Robert S. Choi
Director, Exempt Organizations
Rulings & Agreements

Enclosure
Notice 437
Redacted Proposed Adverse Determination Letter
Redacted Final Adverse Determination Letter

Letter 4038(CG) (11-2005)
Catalog Number 47632S

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION

Release Number: Contact Person:
Release Date: 11/12/10
Date: 8/16/10 Identification Number:
UIL Code: 501.06-00
501.06-01 Contact Number:
501.06-02
Employer Identification Number:
Form Required To Be Filed:
Tax Years:
Dear

This is our final determination that you do not qualify for exemption from Federal income tax as
an organization described in Internal Revenue Code section 501(c)(3). Recently, we sent you a
letter in response to your application that proposed an adverse determination. The letter
explained the facts, law and rationale, and gave you 30 days to file a protest. Since we did not
receive a protest within the requisite 30 days, the proposed adverse determination is now final.

Since you do not qualify for exemption as an organization described in Code section 501(c)(3),
donors may not deduct contributions to you under Code section 170. You must file Federal
income tax returns on the form and for the years listed above within 30 days of this letter, unless
you request an extension of time to file.

We will make this letter and our proposed adverse determination letter available for public
inspection under Code section 6110, after deleting certain identifying information. Please read
the enclosed Notice 437, Notice of Intention to Disclose, and review the two attached letters that
show our proposed deletions. If you disagree with our proposed deletions, you should follow
the instructions in Notice 437. If you agree with our deletions, you do not need to take any
further action.

In accordance with Code section 6104(c), we will notify the appropriate State officials of our
determination by sending them a copy of this final letter and the proposed adverse letter. You
should contact your State officials if you have any questions about how this determination may
affect your State responsibilities and requirements.

Letter 4038(CG) (11-2005)
Catalog Number 476325

2

If you have any questions about this letter, please contact the person whose name and
telephone number are shown in the heading of this letter. If you have any questions about your
Federal income tax status and responsibilities, please contact IRS Customer Service at
1-800-829-1040 or the IRS Customer Service number for businesses, 1-800-829-4933. The
IRS Customer Service number for people with hearing impairments is 1-800-829-4059.

Sincerely,

Robert S. Choi
Director, Exempt Organizations
Rulings & Agreements

Enclosure
Notice 437
Redacted Proposed Adverse Determination Letter
Redacted Final Adverse Determination Letter

Letter 4038 (CG) (11-2005)
Catalog Number 47632S

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

t

DIVISION

Date: 8/13/10 Contact Person:
Identification Number:
Contact Number:
FAX Number:
Employer Identification Number:
Legend: UIL #’s:
B = Incorporator 501.06-00
M = Geographic region 501.06-01
Q = Applicant organization 501.06-02
W = State

X = Similar organization
Y = Similar organization
Z = Similar organization

t= date
w = website
Dear

We have considered your application for recognition of exemption from Federal income tax under
Internal Revenue Code section 501(a). Based on the information provided, we have concluded that you
do not qualify for exemption under Code subsection 501(c)(6) or under any other subsection of 501(a).
The basis for our conclusion is set forth below.

ISSUES

Whether you (Q) are organized and operated primarily for one or more exempt purposes and are tax-
exempt within the meaning of section 501(c)(6).

Whether you (Q) are operated primarily for the benefit of private interests.

FACTS

Organization and Operation

You were organized by B and incorporated under the laws of W ont.

Your purposes as stated in Article 4 of your Certificate of Formation are: “[T]o provide quality early-
stage investment opportunities for accredited investors in the M region, and to assist, educate and connect
early-stage growth companies with information and advisors for the purpose of raising money to enhance
economic growth for the region.”

The detailed narrative description of your activities on the application for recognition of exemption states,
in relevant part. that you propose to operate as an angel investment network to benefit the M. You state
that your activities will benefit the citizens of M through the economic development that results from the
success of businesses made possible by your members’ investments. You explain that angel investor
networks are associations of members who qualify as accredited investors under federal securities laws,
and who seek to identify, screen, and assist early-stage businesses seeking investment capital. Currently,
local entrepreneurs in the region encounter challenges when attempting to obtain equity money from local
investors. You state that you will resolve this issue and fulfill a specific need by serving as a facilitator
between members (accredited investors) and entrepreneur/owners of early-stage growth companies
seeking investment capital in the M. Members will provide entrepreneurs with information and advisors
for the purpose of raising money and assisting in the growth of these enterprises. You also describe
membership meetings, presentation events and training events as educational activities. As a result, you
will assist with the economic development in the M region. One hundred percent of the organization’s
resources will be committed to this purpose. You indicate that fees have been set to cover the
organization's expenses without profit.

Your Membership Handbook provides additional information about your organization and operation.
The handbook states that Q will be a W not-for-profit corporation whose members qualify as
accredited investors under federal securities laws. Q is dedicated to providing quality early-stage
investment opportunities for accredited M angel investors, and to assisting, educating and connecting
early-stage growth companies in the M with information and advisors for the purpose of raising
money and assisting in their growth. Q is intended to be an organization for investors, by investors.
Q will act solely as a facilitator of the investment process, providing members with a method by
which to meet, view, analyze and monitor investment opportunities.

The M has a pool of high net worth individuals with business experience who are looking for
investment opportunities. Investments of most interest will be those that have a potential for high
return and reflect the prevalent industries of the region.

Q’s mission is to satisfy this demand by accredited M angel investors for quality early-stage
investment opportunities. A byproduct of this will be economic development for M, and W by
helping early-stage businesses grow to profitability. Ideally, Q’s expenses will be kept low so that
with a modest number of members and a small number of sponsors, the group can be self-sufficient.

At quarterly investment meetings, Q members will hear presentations from two to four businesses
seeking investment capital. These companies will be chosen by Q members through a formal
application and screening process according to adopted bylaws.

Without defining the terms used, your membership handbook states that success in the short term will

be measured by the “quality of deal flow” and the number of companies funded. In the long run, ROI
(Return on Investment) for members will be the defining measure for success.

Page 2

Membership

Your membership requirements are listed on your exemption application in response to Part II, line 7.
You state that members must certify that they qualify as accredited investors as defined under Rule 501 of
the Securities Exchange Commission regulations. [The federal securities laws define the term "accredited
investor" in Rule 501(a), which is codified in Title 17 of the Code of Federal Regulations as § 230.501
under Regulation D - Rules Governing the Limited Offer and Sale of Securities Without Registration
Under the Securities Act of 1933, as meaning any person or entity that comes within the categories
specified in the regulations, or that the issuer or seller of securities reasonably believes comes within the
specified categories, at the time of the sale of the securities to that person or entity.]

Members must pay the annual membership fee, complete an application for membership, and agree to the
Q Rules of Membership and Conduct. All members will have one vote on organizational issues.
Members must have relevant investment experience or be interested in learning from their peers.

The benefits of membership include: access to quality and screened investment opportunities; opportunity
to co-invest with highly qualified angels; networking with other accredited local investors; occasional
access to deals from similar organizations such as the Y and the Z.

You act solely as the facilitator of the investment process, providing members with a method by which
they may meet, view, analyze and monitor investment opportunities.

Members are responsible for making individual and independent investment decisions, both as to
suitability of an investment and as to the amount, if any, invested based on their own individual
evaluation of the merits of the proposed investment.

You state that you do not provide members or others with investment advice and do not benefit from the
success or failure of the investments of your members.

Marketing material, received with your application included a one page flyer that identifies Q as an
“Investment Group” at the top of the page and states that Q is “[a] not-for-profit organization for
investors, by investors” and “[a] facilitator of the investment process, providing members with a method
by which to meet, view, analyze and monitor investment opportunities.”

You also have a comprehensive website (w), identified as your primary website address on Part I, line 1e
of your exemption application. Your June 20 , letter references your website as a source of
“instructions on the angel investment process.” The website lists the qualifications and benefits of
membership, as well as services provided to participating investors and entrepreneurs. Your website (last
visited April 8, 2010) contains links to other sites that include information on angel investor groups. The
website also explains the activities of accredited angel investors.

LAW

Section 501(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the “Code”) exempts from federal income taxation
organizations described in section 501(c).

Page 3

Section 501(c)(6) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 provides for exemption from federal Income Tax
of business leagues, chambers of commerce, real estate boards, boards of trade, or professional football
leagues. not organized for profit and no part of the net earnings of which inures to the benefit of any
private shareholder or individual.

Section 1.501(c)(6)-1 of the Income Tax Regulations states in part:

A business league is an association of persons having some common business interest, the
purpose of which is to promote such common interest, and not to engage in a regular business of
a kind ordinarily carried on for profit. It is an organization of the same general class as a chamber
of commerce or board of trade. Thus. its activities should be directed to the improvement of
business conditions of one or more lines of business as distinguished from the performance of
particular services for individual persons. An organization, whose purpose is to engage in a
regular business of a kind ordinarily carried on for profit, even though the business is conducted
on a cooperative basis or produces only sufficient income to be self-sustaining, is not a business
league. An association engaged in furnishing information to prospective investors, to enable
them to make sound investments, is not a business league, since its activities do not further any
common business interest. even though all of its income is devoted to the purpose stated. A stock
or commodity exchange [which serves its members as a convenience and economy in buying and
selling] is not a business league, a chamber of commerce, or a board of trade within the meaning
of section 501(c)(6) and is not exempt from tax...

Revenue Ruling 56-84, 1956-1 C.B. 201, held that an organization that is operated primarily for the
purpose of promoting, selling and handling the national advertising in its members’ publications is not
entitled to exemption from Federal income tax as a business league under IRC section 501(c)(6). Such
activities constitute the performance of particular services for the individual members as distinguished
from activities for the improvement of the business conditions of its membership as a whole.

Revenue Ruling 58-224, 1958-1 C.B. 242, held that an organization whose sole activity is to conduct an
annual trade show, not held in conjunction with a convention or annual meeting, but held only for the
purpose of bringing buyers and sellers together, is not exempt under section 501(c)(6) of the Code. The
ruling concluded that the activities of the organization substantially serve its members as a convenience
and economy in the conduct of their businesses. Therefore, the organization is rendering particular
services for individual persons as distinguished from the improvement of business conditions generally.

Revenue Ruling 59-234, 1959-2 C.B. 149. held that a real-estate board whose primary purpose or activity
is the operation of a multiple-listing system is considered to be rendering particular services for its
members as a convenience and economy in the conduct of their respective businesses, rather than for the
improvement of business within the real estate business generally, and is not exempt from Federal income
tax as an organization described in section 501(c)(6) of the Code. The ruling further concluded that the
operation of a real estate multiple listing service constitutes a business of a kind ordinarily carried on for
profit,

Revenue Ruling 59-391, 1959-2 C.B. 151, held that an organization composed of individuals, firms,
associations and corporations, each representing a different trade, business, occupation or profession
whose purpose is to exchange information on business prospects has no common business interest other
than a mutual desire to increase their individual sales. The activities are not directed to the improvement

Page 4

of one or more lines of business, but rather to the promotion of the private interests of its members and is
not exempt under section 501(c)(6) of the Code.

Revenue Ruling 67-182, 1967-1 C.B. 141, considers the exempt status of a nonprofit organization whose
only activity is providing a reference library of “electric logs," maps, and oil publications, and oil
information services, as well as other matters which are a source of geological data, for its members’ use
as an aid in their oil exploration businesses. The organization made specialized information available to
its members on a cooperative basis, which serves as a convenience and economy in the conduct of their
businesses. Furthermore, since membership is limited and the facilities of the organization are made
available only to participating members, the organization's activities are not aimed at the improvement of
business conditions in the industry as a whole. The ruling found that operation of the library as described
is an activity which constitutes the performance of particular services for individual persons.
Accordingly, the organization does not qualify for exemption from federal income tax under section

501(c)(6) of the Code.

Revenue Ruling 70-80, 1970-1 C.B. 130, considers a nonprofit trade association of manufacturers in a
particular line of business whose members consist of a small number manufacturers in the industry.
Although membership in the association is open to all manufacturers in the industry, a significant number
of manufacturers have chosen not to join the association. The ruling held that because the association
directs its activities solely to the benefit of its limited membership, it is not directing its activities to the
improvement of conditions in a business line and is, thus, not exempt under section 501(c)(6) of the Code.

Revenue Ruling 74-228, 1974-1 C.B. 136, held that an organization of transoceanic passenger carriers
that appointed travel agents to book passenger travel on the ships of its members does not qualify for
exemption from Federal income tax under section 501(c)(6) of the Code. By appointing travel agents to
sell passages on the ships of its members under the circumstances described, the organization is providing
its members with a service that assists them in the conduct of their businesses. This activity constitutes
the performance of particular services for members and is not directed to the improvement of general
business conditions within the meaning of the regulations.

Revenue Ruling 76-366, 1976-2 C.B. 144, held that an association of investment clubs formed to enable
members and prospective investors to make sound investments by the mutual exchange of investment
information. does not qualify for exemption from federal income tax. . The association carried on not
only educational activities but other activities directed to the support and promotion of the economic
interests of its members. Moreover, by furnishing information to prospective investors to enable them to
make sound investments, the association is serving private interests

In Produce Exchange Stock Clearing Association v. Helvering, 71 F.2d 142 (2nd Cir. 1934), the Second
Circuit held that there was no reason apparent for granting exemption as a business league to a clearing
house association that served each member as a convenience or economy in his business by providing
facilities for dealings in securities and commodities. The court found that nothing was being done by the
organization to advance the interests of the community or to improve the standards or conditions of a
particular trade. and that the purpose of the organization was to provide a business economy or
convenience for individual traders. In denying the exemption under section 103 of the Revenue Act of
1928 (predecessor statute to section 501(c)(6) of the Code), the court explained that merely serving as a
convenience to members is not a characteristic shared by the entities listed in the statute.

Page 5

In Northwestern Municipal Association, Inc. v. United States, 99 F.2d 460 (8th Cir. 1938), the Eighth
Circuit held that an organization of investment brokers, whose purpose was to represent the interests of
municipal bondholders, and which was formed to perform services members would have been required to
perform themselves in making bond investments, was not exempt under section 501(c)(6) because the
organization's primary activities were found to constitute the performance of particular services for
individual persons. The enterprise was undertaken as a cooperative endeavor to render services which the
separate members might have been required to furnish and its main purpose was to benefit bondholders.
The court concluded “if its [the organization's] main purpose is to benefit its shareholders or individuals it
is not exempt”. The organization engaged in activities of a type ordinarily carried on for profit, and
proceeds from these activities subsidized the services it furnished its members. The court found that the
organization was organized to do a regular business ordinarily carried on for profit, and since in the
course of its business its net earnings inured to the benefit of individuals, it was not exempt from tax. The
court observed that: “... it must be kept in mind that the term ‘net earnings’ may include more than the
term net profits as shown by the books of the organization or than the difference between the gross
receipts and disbursements in dollars. Profit may inure to the benefit of shareholders in other ways than
in dividends.” [Citations omitted.]

In General Contractors’ Association of Milwaukee v. United States, 202 F.2d 633, 636 (7th Cir. 1953),
the Seventh Circuit found that where membership dues supported a quality estimating service, which was
a type of business ordinarily carried on for profit, as the primary activity of an association of general
contractors, the benefits that the service afforded the members was an inurement of net earnings fatal to
exemption under section 501(c)(6) of the Code. The court held that: “[T]hus, where valuable services [of
a type normally performed for profit] are rendered to individual members, as in this case, it may be said
that part of the net earnings of a taxpayer do inure to the benefit of its members...”

In Evanston-North Shore Board of Realtors v. United States, 320 F.2d 375 (Ct. Cl. 1963), cert. den. 376
U.S. 931 (1964), the Claims Court found that an association’s operation of a real estate multiple listing
system cannot be regarded as directed to the improvement of business conditions in the real estate market
within the meaning of the regulations. but rather constitutes the performance of a particular service for
brokers participating in the service, and thus is not exempt under section 501(c)(6) of the Code. In
concluding that the association’s multiple listing systems operates most immediately to the benefit of the
individual participating realtors, the court found several factors compelling. First and foremost is the fact
that the fees charged for the listing service are in approximate proportion to the benefits received by each
realtor. The court stated that: “[w]hen each member contributes in proportion to what he receives, it is a
strong indication that the benefits received are not, as plaintiff contends they are, ‘inherently group
benefits.” Second, the fact that participation in the multiple listing service is limited to members of the
board provides some indication that the service is not designed to serve the real estate business generally.
Finally, the court found a particularly compelling analogy between the operation of a multiple listing
service and of a stock or commodity exchange in that: “Both are means of bringing buyers and sellers
together to facilitate the sale of property. Both are supported by the brokers who earn commissions by
arranging sales of property. Both provide a genuine benefit to persons desirous of buying and selling
properly and to the brokers who deal in such property.”

In Harding Hospital, Inc. v. United States, 505 F.2d 1068 (6th Cir. 1974). the Sixth Circuit held that an
organization seeking a ruling as to recognition of its tax exempt status has the burden of proving that it
satisfies the requirements of the particular exemption statute.

Page 6

APPLICATION OF THE LAW

Does not promote a common business interest

Section 501(c)(6) of the Code sets forth criteria for qualification for exempt status. In addition, a
qualifying exempt organization must be described in section 1.501(c)(6)-1 of the regulations. You fail to
meet the standards set forth in the Code. and you are not described in the regulations because you do not
promote a common business interest. You are an association engaged in furnishing information to
prospective “accredited investors” to enable them to make sound investments. You are not a business
league

Section 1.501(c)(6)-1 of the regulations clearly states that “[a]n association engaged in furnishing
information to prospective investors, to enable them to make sound investments, is not a business
league. since its activities do not further any common business interest, even though all of its income
is devoted to the purpose slated. A stock or commodity exchange is not a business league, a chamber
of commerce, or a board of trade within the meaning of section 501(c)(6) and is not exempt from
tax,

You basically bring buyers and sellers together in order to facilitate the sale of property. This activity is
similar to that described in Revenue Ruling 58-224, which held that conducting an activity to bring
buyers and sellers together does not constitute an exempt purpose under section 501(c)(6) of the Code.

You provide a facility or exchange for the promotion of investment decisions. This is similar to the
situation in Produce Exchange Stock Clearing Association y. Helvering. In this case the court held that
there was no reason apparent for granting exemption as a business league to a clearing house association
that served each member as a convenience or economy in his business by providing facilities for dealings
in securities and commodities. The court found that nothing was being done by the organization to
advance the interests of the community or to improve the standards or conditions of a particular trade.

Your organization's activities, which primarily benefit your members, are similar to the activities of the
plaintiff in the case of Evanston-North Shore Board of Realtors v. United States, where the court drew an
analogy between the operation of a real estate multiple listing service and the operation of a stock or
commodity exchange in ruling that the organization did not promote a common business interest.

Similar to for-profit

Your activities. as described above, provide the members of your organization with an economy and
convenience in the conduct of their individual investment activities, and therefore, constitute the
performance of particular services for individual persons as distinguished from activities aimed at the
improvement of business conditions in their trade as a whole. Your activities constitute a business of a
kind ordinarily carried on for profit. You are similar to the organization described in Revenue Ruling
59-234. which held that the operation of a real estate multiple listing service constitutes a business of a
kind ordinarily carried on for profit.

You also are similar to the appellant organization in Northwestern Municipal Association, Inc. v. United

States. where the court ruled that the organization engaged in activities of a type ordinarily carried on for
profit. Proceeds from these activities subsidized the services it furnished its members. The court observed
that: “... it must be kept in mind that the term ‘net earnings’ may include more than the term net profits as

Page 7

shown by the books of the organization or than the difference between the gross receipts and
disbursements in dollars. Profit may inure to the benefit of shareholders in other ways than in dividends.”

Similarly, the appellant organization in General Contractors’ Association of Milwaukee v. United States
operated a type of business ordinarily carried on for profit, supported by membership dues, as is the case
with your organization. The court found that the benefits accruing to appellant organization’s members

amounted to an inurement of net earnings, fatal to exemption under section 501(c)(6) of the Code.

Private benefit

Section 1.501(c)(6)-1 of the regulations describes a qualifying organization as one that directs its
activities at the improvement of business conditions of one or more lines of business as distinguished
from the performance of particular services for individual persons.

Similar to the organization described in Revenue Ruling 56-84, the particular services you provide are
restricted to your participating members, who represent a limited membership of accredited investors.
Your activities will serve the interests of your members and are not aimed at the improvement of
business conditions in the industry as a whole.

Like the organization described in Revenue Ruling 59-391, the individuals comprising your membership
share no common business interest other than a mutual desire to increase their individual investment
returns.

Revenue Ruling 67-182 held that an organization that has limited membership and makes specialized
information available to its members on a cooperative basis does not qualify for exemption under section
501(c)(6). The organization’s activities are not aimed at improvement of business conditions in the
industry as a whole, but constitute the performance of particular services for individual persons. In a
similar way. your activities are not directed to the improvement of one or more lines of business, the
general economic welfare of the community or the common business interests of an industry, but promote
the private financial interests of your members,

You also are like the association in Revenue Ruling 70-80 because you direct your activities solely to
the benefit of your limited membership rather than to the improvement of conditions in a business
line. as well as the organization in Revenue Ruling 74-228 whose restricted membership consists of a
small number of members (such as your accredited investors) within an industry. Because your
organization directs its activities solely to the benefit of its limited membership, it is not directing its
Activities to the improvement of conditions in a business line and is, thus, not exempt under section

501(c)(6) of the Code.

In addition, by furnishing information to prospective investors to enable them to make sound
investments, you are serving private interests and carry on activities directed to the support and
promotion of the economic interests of your members, similar to the organization in Revenue Ruling
76-366.

Your activities may be described as a cooperative endeavor or enterprise undertaken to render services
that your separate members might have otherwise been required to furnish, as with the case of the
organization described in Northwestern Municipal Association, Inc. v. United States.

Page 8

Other

Furthermore. you have not demonstrated that you have satisfied the requirements of the Code section
under which you applied, as required in Harding Hospital Inc. v. United States, which also specifies that
the burden of proof rests with the applicant organization.

APPLICANT’S POSITION

You state that you meet the requirements of section 501(c)(6) based on the following assertions: You
are an association of persons having a common business interest. That interest is to facilitate
entrepreneurs in the M area in obtaining capital from the investment community at large. You have no
profit motive — your fees are set to cover expected operating expenses on a break-even basis. No
profits will inure to the organization or its members. Your activities are completely directed towards
improving the overall business climate of the M, benefiting all citizens through increased
employment opportunities and tax revenues. You are organized along the lines of a chamber of
commerce. assessing membership fees for the benefit of bringing like minded business people
together to discuss and evaluate business opportunities with no activities to be performed on an
individual business level for its members or entrepreneurs. Therefore you state that your organization
is not similar to the organizations cited in Revenue Ruling. 56-84 and Revenue Ruling 74-228 as not
entitled to recognition of tax-exemption under IRC section 501(c)(6).

When asked how you further an exempt purpose under 501(c)(6). you responded:

There are multiple benefits addressed under this section. First, there are benefits for the
members of the organization. By participating in the angel network, members will be provided
training and educational opportunities relating to investment trends, issues, and best practices.
In addition, members are provided an opportunity to identify, screen, and assist early-stage
companies seeking investment capital with a group of peers who can provide additional
expertise and insights into the investments offered. Secondly, the entrepreneurs benefit from
the opportunity to seek investment capital from the membership. Finally, the local region
benefits from the economic development benefits resulting from the growth of these companies
and the wealth created by the members’ investments. You are an association of members who
qualify as accredited investors under federal securities laws and who seek to take an active role
in the organization to identify. screen, and assist early-stage businesses seeking investment
capital, You do not promote any one line of business, but accept applications from any line of
business. You seek to assist your members in identifying and vetting investment opportunities
by reducing the risk and providing for shared access to due diligence processes. Much as the
local chamber of commerce seeks to connect local businesses for the purposes of business-to-
business exchanges, you seek to connect qualified investors with entrepreneurs who seek
capital investments and business advice. The organization itself does not invest in any of the
business opportunities. All membership fees and application fees will be used for
administrative costs and costs associated with membership meetings, entrepreneur presentation
events. and training and educational events,

When asked to clarify this phrase, “looking for companies with potential for high returns”, used in your
application in connection with your activities, you provided the following rationale:

Page 9

Members of a chamber of commerce join the organization to benefit their individual
companies. a large part of which is to increase their profits by meeting potential customers who
are also members of the organization. This comment should be taken in the context that the
purpose of the organization is to enable businesses to succeed. In that respect, the term is
intended to refer to the fact that the Q seeks to assist businesses that have the potential to make
the most economic impact for the potential employees and citizens in the M region. While the
individual members of a chamber might receive a private benefit from the membership, the
organization itself (chamber) does not profit from this benefit. Q operates in the same way, so
we are unclear why chambers would qualify as non-profit, but an angel network would not
qualify,

SERVICE’S RESPONSE TO APPLICANT’S POSITION

You state that your activities “are completely directed towards improving the overall business climate of
the M, benefiting all citizens through increased employment opportunities and tax revenues...the local
region benefits from the economic development benefits resulting from the growth of these companies
and the wealth created by the member’s investments,” and that you seek “to assist businesses that have
the potential to make the most economic impact for the potential employees and citizens in the M region.”
However, promotion of regional economic development as a public benefit is not your primary concern.
On your website. you specifically state that any “economic development for the M and W is merely a
“byproduct” of your mission to provide investment opportunities for accredited M investors. It is
clear that your main focus is on providing investment opportunities and maximizing investment returns
for high net worth investors. You state that “[i]nvestments of the most interest will be those that have a
potential for high return and reflect the prevalent industries of the region.” You primarily select
investment candidates based on potential return on investment and not on any community benefit. The
reason local businesses and entrepreneurs are beneficiaries of your activities, is evident in your statement:

“Most groups maintain a local or region geographic focus in order to maximize members” ability to
actively engage in the growth of their investments.” You further state: “To maximize the value added,
most specialize in industries or technologies they understand, and invest only in companies within

close geographic proximity.”

Although you assert no profit motive and emphasize that your fees are set to cover expected operating
expenses on a break-even basis, providing services, even at cost, lacks the donative element necessary to
distinguish the services from a regular trade or business ordinarily carried on for profit. And as set forth
in section 1.501(c)(6)-1, even though a business produces only sufficient income to be self-sustaining, if
it is of a kind ordinarily carried on for profit, as is the case with your enterprise, it is outside the scope of
section 501(c)(6).

You emphasize the educational component of your activities by mentioning “membership meetings,
entrepreneur presentation events, and training and educational events.” Yet by furnishing information to
prospective investors in order to enable them to make sound investments, you are serving private interests
and carrying on activities ultimately directed to the support and promotion of the economic interests of
your members.

On your website, you state that the goal of wealthy angel investors is “to achieve higher returns than the
typical public markets provide,” particularly given the risk involved. You state that seek returns of

Page 10

at least ten times their initial investment within seven years. The main focus is on measures of
profitability and growth.

Your primary purpose is to serve as an investment agent, linking potential investors with entrepreneurs
and start-up or early-stage businesses seeking investment capital. You are a self-described “membership
organization established to facilitate interactions between entrepreneurs seeking investment capital.” You
acknowledge that you act “solely as a facilitator of the investment process, providing members with a
method by which to meet, view, analyze and monitor investment opportunities.” Your mission statement
“is to provide quality early-stage investment opportunities for accredited M investors.” You are in
essence a venture capital organization, operated in your own words “for investors, by investors.”

CONCLUSION

Based on the facts presented above, we conclude that you do not meet the requirements for tax exemption
under section 501(c)(6) of the Code because your primary activities are not those of an organization
exempt under that section, and you are not a business league, a chamber of commerce, or a board of trade.
Specifically, you perform particular services for individual persons, engage in a regular business of a kind
ordinarily carried on for profit, and in furnishing information to prospective investors, do not further any
common business interest but operate primarily for the benefit of private interests. Therefore, exemption
under section 501(c)(6) of the Code is denied.

YOUR APPEAL RIGHTS

You have the right to file a protest if you believe this determination is incorrect. To protest, you must
submit a statement of your views and fully explain your reasoning. You must submit the statement,
signed by one of your officers, within 30 days from the date of this letter.

We will consider your statement and decide if that information affects our determination. If your
statement does not provide a basis to reconsider our determination, we will forward your case to our
Appeals Office. You can find more information about the role of the Appeals Office in Publication 892,
Exempt Organization Appeal Procedures for Unagreed Issues.

An attorney. certified public accountant. or an individual enrolled to practice before the Internal Revenue
Service may represent you during the appeal process. To be represented during the appeal process, you
must file a proper power of attorney, Form 2848, Power of Attorney and Declaration of Representative, if
you have not already done so. For more information about representation, see Publication 947, Practice
Before the IRS and Power of Attorney. All forms and publications mentioned in this letter can be found
at www.irs.gov, Forms and Publications.

If you do not intend to protest this determination, you do not need to take any further action. If we do not
hear from you within 30 days, we will issue a final adverse determination letter to you. That letter will

provide information about filing tax returns and other matters.

Please send your protest statement, Form 2848 and any supporting documents to the applicable address:

Page 11

Mail to: Deliver to:

You may also fax your statement using the fax number shown in the heading of this letter. If you fax
your statement, please call the person identified in the heading of this letter to confirm that he or she
received your fax.

If you have any questions, please contact the person whose name and telephone number are shown in the
heading of this letter,

Sincerely,

Rob Choi

Director, Exempt Organizations

Rulings & Agreements
Enclosure, Publication 892

Page 12

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2010, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.