PLR 1045004: REIT granted extra time to make a consent dividend election

Plain-English summary

The IRS granted a real estate investment trust an additional 45 days to make a consent dividend election. The taxpayer had understated its taxable income because of errors involving an interest expense limitation and property received as a dividend, along with communication failures between the taxpayer's parent and its accounting firm. The IRS found that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith and that granting relief would not prejudice the government. The ruling addressed only the extension of time and did not determine whether the taxpayer or another entity qualified as a REIT.

Ruling snapshot

• Question: May the taxpayer receive additional time to make a consent dividend election under the section 301.9100 regulations?
• Outcome: Approved
• Key authorities: IRC §§ 561 and 565; Treas. Reg. §§ 1.565-1 and 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201045004 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 11/12/2010 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 9100.00-00, 565.00-00
Person To Contact:
--------------------------------------------------- -------------------------, ID No. -------------
------------------------------------------------- Telephone Number:
-------------------------------------------- ---------------------
---------------------------------- Refer Reply To:
CC:ITA:B02
PLR-105720-10
Date:
August 03, 2010

              TY: -------

LEGEND

Taxpayer = ---------------------------------------------------
Parent = --------------------------
Manager = ---------------------------------
Company = -----------------------------------------
A = -------------
X = --
Country B = ------------
Date 1 = -------------------
Date 2 = ---------------------------
Date 3 =--------------
Date 4 = --------------------
Year 1 = -------
Year 2 = -------
$aa = -----------------
$bb = ---------------
$cc = -----------------
$dd = -----------------
Accounting Firm = ----------------------------------------

Dear -----------------:

    This letter is in response to a ruling request dated -----------------------, modified by

a letter dated -------------------, submitted on behalf of Taxpayer, requesting an extension
of time to make a consent dividend election under section 565 of the Internal Revenue
Code. This request is made pursuant to sections 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 of the
Procedure and Administration Regulations.
PLR-105720-10 2

                                     FACTS

   Taxpayer is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the state of A.

Taxpayer has elected to be treated as a Real Estate Investment Trust for Federal
income tax purposes since Date 1. Taxpayer’s sole shareholder is Parent, a Country B
Listed Property Trust. Parent is managed by Manager, a fully integrated retail property
ownership and services organization involved in retail property ownership, leasing,
redevelopment and funds management. Taxpayer uses the accrual method of
accounting as its overall method of accounting and files its tax returns on a calendar-
year basis. Parent acquired Taxpayer mid-year, Year 1.

   On Date 2, Taxpayer timely filed Form 1120-REIT for Year 1, and included Form

972, “Consent of Shareholder to Include Specific Amount in Gross Income,” in which
Parent agreed to include $aa in its taxable income for the tax year. Taxpayer’s tax
return was prepared by Accounting Firm. Before mid-year Year 2, Parent did not have
a dedicated tax department, and staff turnover within Parent’s other departments led to
communication lapses during the time Taxpayer’s Year 1 tax returns were being
prepared.

    On Date 3, Taxpayer discovered that it understated real estate investment trust

taxable income on its Year 1 Federal income tax return by the amount of $bb because
the information provided to Accounting Firm to calculate the Year 1 interest expense
limitation under section 163(j) of the Internal Revenue Code was incorrect. Taxpayer
calculated its interest expense limitation under section 163(j) by using a method that
took into account fluctuations in accounts payable and accounts receivable.

    However, because the accounts payable and accounts receivable had been

included in the purchase price Parent paid for Taxpayer, subsequent payments and
collections on the respective accounts would not be reflected on Taxpayer’s income
statement. As such, Taxpayer determined that, as of the acquisition date of Taxpayer
by Parent, Taxpayer should have reset the accounts receivable and accounts payable
to zero for purposes of calculating the fluctuations instead of using the balances in the
accounts as of the acquisition date.

   On Date 4, Taxpayer discovered that its real estate investment trust taxable

income for Year 1 was further understated by $cc. During Year 1, Taxpayer had
received a dividend of property in the amount of $dd from Company, a taxable REIT
subsidiary in which Taxpayer invested. Taxpayer subsequently sold the distributed
property to a third party approximately X days later. Due to communication failures,
Parent’s employees failed to inform Accounting Firm that the property had been
received as a dividend. Accounting Firm was only informed of the sale of the distributed
property to the third party.
PLR-105720-10 3

                              LAW AND ANALYSIS

   Section 565(a) of the Internal Revenue Code provides that if any person owns

consent stock (as defined in section 565(f)(1)) in a corporation on the last day of the
taxable year of such corporation, and such person agrees, in a consent filed with the
return of such corporation in accordance with the regulations, to treat as a dividend the
amount specified in such consent, the amount so specified shall, except as provided in
section 565(b), constitute a consent dividend for purposes of section 561 (relating to the
deduction for dividends paid).

     Section 1.565-1(a) of the Income Tax Regulations provides that the dividends

paid deduction, as defined in section 561, includes the consent dividends for the taxable
year. A consent dividend is a hypothetical distribution (as distinguished from an actual
distribution) made by certain corporations to any person who owns consent stock on the
last day of the taxable year of such corporation and who agrees to treat the hypothetical
distribution as an actual dividend, subject to specified limitations, by filing a consent at
the time and in the manner specified in section 1.565-1(b). Section 1.565-1(b)(3)
provides that a consent may be filed not later than the due date of the corporation’s
income tax return for the taxable year for which the dividends paid deduction is claimed.
Under Rev. Rul. 78-296, 1978-2 C.B. 183, the due date for purposes of section 1.565-
1(b)(3) includes the extended due date of a return filed pursuant to an extension of time
to file.

    Section 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, in

exercising his discretion, may grant a reasonable extension of time under the rules set
forth in section 301.9100-3 to make a regulatory election under all subtitles of the
Internal Revenue Code except subtitles E, G, H, and I. The term “regulatory election” is
defined in section 301.9100-1(b) as an election whose due date is prescribed by a
regulation published in the Federal Register, or a revenue ruling, revenue procedure, or
announcement published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin.

    Section 301.9100-3(a) provides that requests for relief subject to this section will

be granted when the taxpayer provides the evidence to establish to the satisfaction of
the Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and the grant of
relief will not prejudice the interests of the government.

   Under section 301.9100-3(b)(1)(i), except as provided in paragraphs (b)(3)(i)

through (iii), a taxpayer is deemed to have acted reasonably and in good faith if the
taxpayer requests relief before the failure to make the regulatory election is discovered
by the Service.
PLR-105720-10 4

 Paragraphs (b)(3)(i) through (iii) of section 301.9100-3 provide that a taxpayer is

deemed not to have acted reasonably and in good faith if the taxpayer:

   (i) seeks to alter a return position for which an accuracy-related penalty could be
   imposed under section 6662 at the time the taxpayer requests relief and the new
   position requires or permits a regulatory election for which relief is requested;

   (ii) was informed in all material respects of the required election and related tax
   consequences, but chose not to file the election; or

   (iii) uses hindsight in requesting relief. If specific facts have changed since the
   due date for making the election that make the election advantageous to a
   taxpayer, the Service will not ordinarily grant relief. In such a case, the Service
   will grant relief only when the taxpayer provides strong proof that the taxpayer’s
   decision to seek relief did not involve hindsight.

    Section 301.9100-3(c)(1) provides that the interests of the government are

prejudiced if granting relief would result in the taxpayer having a lower tax liability in the
aggregate for all taxable years affected by the election than the taxpayer would have
had if the election had been timely made. The interests of the government are ordinarily
prejudiced if the taxable year in which the regulatory election should have been made,
or any taxable years that would have been affected by the election had it been timely
made, are closed by the period of limitations on assessment.

                                  CONCLUSION

    Based upon our analysis of the facts, Taxpayer acted reasonably and in good

faith, and granting relief will not prejudice the interests of the government. Therefore
the requirements of sections 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 have been met.

    Under the facts represented, Taxpayer’s failure to make a proper consent

dividend election was not due to the intentional disregard of the tax rules, but was due
to inadvertent errors and communications failures on the part of Parent’s employees.
Taxpayer did not affirmatively choose not to file the election. Taxpayer is not seeking to
alter a return position or to use hindsight to request relief. Finally, Taxpayer acted
promptly in filing its request for relief, before the Service discovered the failure to make
the regulatory election. Therefore, Taxpayer did not act unreasonably or in bad faith.

    Furthermore, granting relief will not result in Taxpayer having a lower tax liability

in the aggregate for all taxable years affected by the election than Taxpayer would have
had if the election had been timely made, nor will any closed years be affected.
Therefore, the interests of the government will not be prejudiced by granting the request
for relief.
PLR-105720-10 5

   Because Taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and because the interests

of the government will not be prejudiced if the request for relief is granted, Taxpayer is
granted an extension of 45 days from the date of this ruling to file its consent dividend
election. A copy of this letter should be attached to the amended return filed reflecting
the election.

   Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied

concerning the tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or
referenced in this letter.

  Further, no opinion is expressed or implied whether Taxpayer or any entity

mentioned in this letter that purports to be a Real Estate Investment Trust qualifies as a
Real Estate Investment Trust under Part II of Subchapter M of the Code.

  This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of

the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

     In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this

letter is being sent to your authorized representative.

   A copy of this letter must be attached to any income tax return to which it is

relevant. Alternatively, taxpayers filing their returns electronically may satisfy this
requirement by attaching a statement to their return that provides the date and control
number of the letter ruling.

  The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and

representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury
statement executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of
the material submitted in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on
examination.

                                    Sincerely,


                                    Thomas D. Moffitt
                                    Branch Chief, Branch 2
                                    (Income Tax & Accounting)