Private Letter Ruling 1043051 Released October 29, 2010 Denied Transcribed from scan

PLR 1043051: IRS denied an automatic amortization extension because the funding improvement plan was not adopted on time

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2010, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2010
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The IRS considered a plan's request for an automatic amortization extension under IRC § 431(d). It denied favorable relief because the funding improvement plan required for the extension was not adopted during the relevant plan year. The actuary's certification said that the plan sponsor would devise a funding improvement plan after the plan's status was certified, and the IRS later confirmed that no plan had been adopted. A review of board minutes also did not show that the plan had been adopted. The letter states that the time period for adopting a funding improvement plan for the year ended March 31, 2010, had passed.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the plan receive an automatic amortization extension under IRC § 431(d) when the required funding improvement plan was not adopted during the plan year?
  • Outcome: Denied
  • Key authorities: IRC § 431(d)(1)(A); IRC § 431(d)(1)(B)

Full text (IRS public release)

Department of the Treasury

Internal Revenue Service

Washington, D.C. 20224

Significant Index Number 0431.00-00

Tax Exempt and Government Entities
Division

August 2, 2010

[illegible]

Re:

Dear:

This letter is to inform you of an adverse decision regarding your request for an automatic amortization extension as permitted in section 431(d) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”). This extension would have been effective for the plan year beginning April 1, 2009. The adverse decision is due to the fact that the funding improvement plan was not adopted during the plan year.

Section 431(d)(1)(A) of the Code requires the Secretary to extend the period of time required to amortize any unfunded liability of a plan for a period of time (not in excess of 5 years) if the Plan submits an application meeting the criteria stated in section 431(d)(1)(B). The plan must submit the required information to meet the criteria in section 431(d)(1)(B), including a certification from the plan's actuary that, in part:

(ii) the plan sponsor has adopted a plan to improve the plan's funding status,

The actuarial certification provided indicated that:

“The plan sponsor has devised a plan to improve the Plan's funding status. Under WRERA, the plan sponsor froze the Plan's status on April 1, 2009. Once the Plan's status is certified as of April 1, 2010, the Plan sponsor will devise a plan to improve the Plan's funding status.”

[illegible] of the IRS spoke with the plan's actuary, on April [illegible], 20[illegible] to clarify whether a plan to improve the funding status was devised for the plan year beginning April [illegible], 20[illegible]. [Illegible] confirmed that [illegible] had not occurred.

During the June [illegible], 20[illegible], Conference of Right, [illegible] indicated that Board minutes for the January [illegible] 20[illegible] meeting may indicate that a funding improvement plan was adopted by March [illegible] 20[illegible]. A review of those minutes did not indicate that such plan was adopted. Therefore, section 431(d)(1)(A)(ii) has not been met. Given that the time period for adopting a funding improvement plan for the year ended March 31, 2010, has passed, we cannot provide a favorable ruling for an extension.

Pursuant to a power of attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter ruling is being sent to your authorized representative.

If you require further assistance in this matter, please contact

Sincerely yours,

David M. Ziegler, Manager
EP Actuarial Group 2

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2010, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.