Subsidy payments that are not taxes need another deduction basis
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2010, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Chief Counsel addressed whether payments used to provide a subsidy qualify as deductible taxes. The advice states that IRC § 901(i) treats such a payment as not being a tax for purposes of Title 26. As a result, the payment is not deductible under IRC § 164, and its deduction is not disallowed under § 275. The taxpayer would instead need an independent basis under another Code provision.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: How should subsidy payments that are not treated as taxes be analyzed for deduction purposes?
- Outcome: Advice given
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 164, 275, and 901(i)
Full text (IRS public release)
ID: CCA-628162-10 Number: 201043035
Release Date: 10/29/2010
Office: -------------------------
UILC: 901.00-00
From: ----------------------
Sent: Monday, June 28, 2010 4:22 PM
To: ---------------------
Cc: -----------------------------
Subject: RE: FTs are a subsidy. Do we allow a deduction? ----------
Hi -----------
Section 901(i) provides that a tax used to provide a subsidy is not treated as a tax for purposes of title 26. If the payments are not a tax, they are not deductible under section 164 and deduction is not disallowed under section 275. Rather, the taxpayer would have to make an independent justification for deducting the tax payments under another Code provision. Please feel free to give me a call if you’d like to discuss.
Thanks,
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2010, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.