Corporate officer should sign the Form SS-8 perjury statement
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2010, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Chief Counsel responded to a question about the signature required on a corporate employer’s penalties-of-perjury statement when information is requested on Form SS-8. The advice states that the individual signing the statement should be an officer of the corporation.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Who should sign a corporate employer’s penalties-of-perjury statement submitted with information requested on Form SS-8?
- Outcome: Advice given
- Key authorities: IRC § 3121; Form SS-8
Full text (IRS public release)
ID: CCA-527163-10 Number: 201043034
Release Date: 10/29/2010
Office: ------------------------------
UILC: 3121.04-00
From: --------------------------
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 4:30 p.m.
To: --------------------------------------
CC: ---------------
Subject: Signatures on Form SS-8
------------------we heard back from ----------regarding your question about whether an officer of a corporation needs to sign the penalties of perjury statement when we are soliciting information from them on Form SS-8 (when the worker initiates the request). His response was this: "The Service should ensure that the individual signing the corporate employer's perjury statement is an officer of that corporation."
Let us know if you have any other questions.
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2010, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.