Private Letter Ruling 1043001 Released October 29, 2010 Approved

Catastrophe-insurance bonds are not private activity bonds

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2010, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2010
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The IRS ruled that proposed Category B and Category C bonds issued to fund catastrophe-insurance claims would not be private activity bonds under IRC § 141. Although commercial policyholders would be private business users of bond proceeds, premium surcharges and assessments used to pay bond debt service were treated as generally applicable taxes rather than private payments or security. The bonds also did not meet the private loan financing test because claimants had no repayment obligation and there was no assurance they would buy future insurance. The ruling is conditional on the proposed rules being finalized as described and does not decide whether bond interest is excludable under § 103(a).

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Will the proposed Category B and Category C catastrophe-insurance bonds be private activity bonds under § 141?
  • Outcome: Approved
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 103, 141, and 6110; Treas. Reg. §§ 1.103-1, 1.141-1 through 1.141-5

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201043001 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 10/29/2010 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 141.00-00, 141.01-00
Person To Contact:
----------------------------------------- --------------------------, ID No. -------------
----------------------- Telephone Number:
------------------------ ---------------------
------------------------------------------- Refer Reply To:
--------------------------- CC:FIP:B05
PLR-102461-10
Date:
July 19, 2010

Legend:

Association = ------------------------------------------------------

Catastrophe Insurance = -------------------------------

Category A Bonds = -------------------

Category B Bonds = -------------------

Category C Bonds = -------------------

Commissioner = ------------------------------------

Date 1 = ---------------------------

Department = ------------------------------------------

Issuer = -----------------------------------------

State = -------------------

a = --

b = --

c = --

d = --

e = -------------------

PLR-102461-10 2

f = -------------------

G = -----------

h = ----

i = -----------------

j = ----

Dear -------------:

This is in response to your request for a ruling that Issuer’s proposed Category B Bonds
and Category C Bonds will not be private activity bonds within the meaning of § 141 of
the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”). You have withdrawn your request for a ruling
with respect to the Category A Bonds.

FACTS AND REPRESENTATIONS

Issuer is a public authority of State, created by an act of State’s legislature. Among
other things, Issuer is authorized to issue bonds for the purpose of paying claims for
losses incurred by purchasers of Catastrophe Insurance policies from Association.

Association was established by an act of State’s legislature for the purpose of providing
Catastrophe Insurance to applicants who would otherwise be unable to obtain such
insurance in the marketplace. As a condition of transacting business in State, every
licensed property insurer in State must be a member of Association. Association is
governed by a board of directors, comprised of a voting directors. Each of the directors
is appointed by Commissioner. Commissioner is required to appoint b directors (which
number is less than half of a) from a list of persons provided by Association’s members.
The directors serve terms of c years each and are limited to serving d full-length terms.
The directors may be removed for cause by Commissioner.

At the end of each year, a portion of Association’s net equity is transferred to State’s
catastrophe reserve trust fund. Additionally, Association must file with Department an
annual statement summarizing Association’s operations for the preceding year.

In accordance with State law, each year Association’s members must contribute
moneys to Association to participate in the costs of insured losses and operating
expenses, to the extent that such losses and expenses exceed Association’s premium
receipts and other revenue. Each member’s share of the contributions is in proportion

PLR-102461-10 3

to that member’s net direct premiums received during the preceding calendar year out
of the aggregate net direct premiums of all members of Association during such year.

The members do not have rights to the moneys they pay to Association. Association
may only spend its funds in furtherance of its purposes. Upon dissolution, all assets of
Association revert to State.

Association sells Catastrophe Insurance to persons otherwise unable to obtain such
insurance from a private insurer. Association sells both commercial policies (available
only to persons engaged in a trade or business) and residential policies (available only
to natural persons not engaged in a trade or business). There are differences between
the residential and commercial policies because the policies provide different coverages
to its policyholders on different types of property. As a result, the policies are rated
separately.

Following the occurrence of a catastrophic event, as specified by State law, Issuer is
authorized to issue bonds to pay insurance claims arising from both commercial and
residential policies to the extent that such claims exceed the reserved moneys in
Association’s fund. In the event the moneys in the fund are insufficient to pay all claims,
Issuer is authorized to issue up to $e of Category A Bonds. The Category A Bonds will
be repaid from future insurance premium revenues collected by Association.
Association will also pledge these premium revenues for payment of the Category A
Bonds.

In the event the Category A Bonds are insufficient to pay the claims, Issuer is
authorized to issue up to $f of Category B Bonds. G percent of the cost of the Category
B Bonds will be paid from premium surcharges assessed on all policyholders who
reside or have operations in, or whose insured property is located in a catastrophe area
for each insurance policy issued for property located in the catastrophe area (the
“Premium Surcharges”). The premium surcharges apply to all policies that provide
coverage on any premises, locations, operations, or property located in the area for all
property and casualty lines of insurance, other than federal flood insurance, workers’
compensation insurance, accident and health insurance, and medical malpractice
insurance.

State law does not limit or otherwise dictate the manner in which the Premium
Surcharges are assessed (for example, whether or not they are to be generally applied
at a uniform rate). Department’s proposed rules indicate that the Premium Surcharge
rate is a flat percentage applicable to all policies (i.e., a set percentage of premium or
exposure). These rules are expected to be finalized and in effect no later than Date 1.

The remaining h percent of the cost of the Category B Bonds will be paid by
assessments on all property insurers licensed to do business in State (the
“Assessments”).

PLR-102461-10 4

In the event the Category B Bonds are insufficient to pay the claims, Issuer may issue
up to $i of Category C Bonds. The Category C Bonds will be paid from additional
Assessments on all property insurers licensed to do business in State.

Under State law, the Assessments may not be refunded. Additionally, State law
provides that each of the Category B Bonds and Category C Bonds (collectively, the
“Bonds”) may not be outstanding for more than j years.

LAW AND ANALYSIS

Section 103(a) of the Code provides that gross income does not include interest on any
state or local bond. Section 103(b)(1) provides that § 103(a) does not apply to any
private activity bond which is not a qualified bond within the meaning of § 141.

Section 141(a) provides that a private activity bond is any bond issued as part of an
issue that meets either (1) the private business use test of § 141(b)(1) and the private
security or payment test of § 141(b)(2), or (2) the private loan financing test of § 141(c).

Thus, in order for the Bonds to be private activity bonds, both the private business use
test and the private security or payment test, or the private loan financing test must be
met.

Private Business Use Test

Section 141(b)(1) provides that, generally, a bond issue meets the private business use
test if more than 10 percent of the proceeds of the issue are to be used for any private
business use. Section 141(b)(6)(A) provides that the term ”private business use“
means use (directly or indirectly) in a trade or business carried on by any person other
than a governmental unit.

Section 1.141-1(b) defines a nongovernmental person as a person other than a
governmental person. A governmental person means a state or local governmental unit
as defined in § 1.103-1 or any instrumentality thereof.

Section 1.141-2(a) provides, in part, that the private activity bond tests serve to identify
arrangements that have the potential to transfer the benefits of tax-exempt financing, as
well as arrangements that actually transfer these benefits. The regulations under § 141
may not be applied in a manner that is inconsistent with these purposes.

Section 1.141-3(a)(2) provides that, in determining whether an issue meets the private
business use test, it is necessary to look to both the indirect and direct uses of
proceeds. For example, a facility is treated as being used for a private business use if it
is leased to a nongovernmental person and subleased to a governmental person or if it

PLR-102461-10 5

is leased to a governmental person and then subleased to a nongovernmental person,
provided that in each case the nongovernmental person’s use is in a trade or business.
Similarly, the issuer’s use of the proceeds to engage in a series of financing
transactions for property to be used by nongovernmental persons in their trades or
businesses may cause the private business use test to be met. In addition, proceeds
are treated as used in the trade or business of a nongovernmental person if a
nongovernmental person, as a result of a single transaction or a series of related
transactions, uses property acquired with the proceeds of an issue.

Section 1.141-3(b)(1) provides that both actual and beneficial use by a
nongovernmental person may be treated as private business use. In most cases, the
private business use test is met only if a nongovernmental person has special legal
entitlements to use the financed property under an arrangement with the issuer. In
general, a nongovernmental person is treated as a private business user of proceeds
and financed property as a result of ownership; actual or beneficial use of property
pursuant to a lease, or a management or incentive payment contract; or certain other
arrangements such as a take or pay or other output-type contract.

Section 1.141-3(b)(7)(i) provides that any other arrangement that conveys special legal
entitlements for beneficial use of bond proceeds or of financed property that are
comparable to special legal entitlements such as ownership, leases or management
contracts (or other arrangements not relevant for this purpose) results in private
business use. For example, an arrangement that conveys priority rights to the use or
capacity of a facility generally results in private business use.

Section 141 was enacted by the Tax Reform Act of 1986. 1986-3 (Vol. 1) C.B. 1. With
respect to the private business use test, the House Report to this act states:

         The determination of who used bond proceeds or bond-
         financed property generally is made by reference to the
         ultimate user of the proceeds or property. As under present
         law, however, the proceeds of an issue generally are not
         treated as used in any trade or business of a
         nongovernmental person when the proceeds are used to pay
         for services rendered to the government or to defray other
         liabilities of a governmental unit arising from general
         government operations. For example, bond proceeds used
         to purchase a computer to be owned and used by the
         purchasing governmental unit are not treated as used in the
         computer company’s business. Likewise, bond proceeds
         used to satisfy contractual obligations undertaken in
         connection with general governmental operations, such as
         payment of government employees’ salaries, or to pay legal
         judgment against a governmental unit, are not treated as

PLR-102461-10 6

         used in the business of the payee. This is to be contrasted
         with the indirect nongovernmental use of bond proceeds that
         occurs     when     a     government      contracts    with    a
         nongovernmental person to supply that person’s business
         with a service (e.g., electric energy) on a basis different from
         that on which the service is provided to the public generally
         or to finance property used in that person’s business (e.g., a
         manufacturing plant).        In both of these instances a
         nongovernmental person is considered to use the bond
         proceeds other than as a member of the general public.

H. R. Rep. No. 426, 99th Cong. 1st Sess. 522-23 (1985), 1986-3 (Vol. 2) C.B. 522-23.
(House of Representatives Report).

The proceeds of the Bonds will be used to make payments in respect of claims received
by Association from various residential and commercial policyholders who have suffered
damage as a result of a catastrophic event. Once the proceeds are paid to the
policyholders, the policyholders are not restricted in any way as to their use of the
proceeds. Thus, the policyholders will own them outright.

In contrast with the examples in the legislative history of § 141, the Bonds are not being
used to finance working capital expenditures (such as employee salaries and other
expenditures arising from general governmental operations) because they are
reimbursing policyholders for losses. The Bond proceeds are not being paid in respect
of services rendered to Association; rather, they are paid in respect of a contractually
purchased right by policyholders, similar to the purchase of electricity from a municipal
utility. Therefore, the use of the Bond proceeds must be tracked following the transfer
of the proceeds to the policyholders. Just as electricity provided by a municipal utility
from a tax-exempt bond financed generation facility is tracked following the construction
of such generation facility, so must the use (including ownership) be tracked in this case
following the payment of claims by Association.

Here, the proceeds of the Bonds will be used to pay claims of Association’s
policyholders, made pursuant to each policyholder’s respective insurance contract with
Association, upon a catastrophic event resulting in damage to a policyholder’s property.
While the policyholders are able to use the proceeds they receive to rebuild their
respective properties, they are not required to use them in any particular manner.

Commercial policyholders who receive Bond proceeds in satisfaction of their claims are
private business users who own the proceeds. The amounts of proceeds owned by
such persons must be aggregated in order to determine whether the private business
use test is met. Issuer has made no assertion that use by nongovernmental persons
will not exceed the percentage limits set forth in § 141(b) or any other basis on which to
establish the private business use test will not be met.

PLR-102461-10 7

Additionally, Issuer is unable to avail itself of the public use exception here. There are
enough differences between residential and commercial insurance policies, with each
policy type providing different coverages to its respective category of policyholders, so
that each policy type must be rated separately. Regardless, even if the residential
policyholders and commercial policyholders have a right to payment of claims on the
same basis, all policyholders (including the commercial policyholders) will own the
proceeds, meaning that they will have a “special entitlement” to the proceeds for as long
as the Bonds remain outstanding (a period greater than 200 days). As a result, the
public use exception is unavailable. Thus, the use of Bond proceeds by the commercial
policyholders must be counted as private business use. Furthermore, no other
exception under § 1.141-3(d) applies here.

Therefore, the Bonds meet the private business use test. In order for the Bonds not to
be private activity bonds, they cannot meet the private security or payment test or the
private loan financing test.

Private Security or Payment Test

An issue meets the private security test of § 141(b)(2)(A) if the payment of the principal
of, or interest on, more than 10 percent of the proceeds of an issue is (under the terms
of the issue or any underlying arrangement) directly or indirectly secured by any interest
in property used or to be used for a private business use (or by any interest in payments
in respect of such property).

An issue meets the private payment test of § 141(b)(2)(B) if the payment of the principal
of, or interest on, more than 10 percent of the proceeds of an issue is (under the terms
of the issue or any underlying arrangement) directly or indirectly derived from payments
(whether or not to the issuer) in respect of property (or borrowed money) used or to be
used for a private business use.

Section 1.141-4(a)(1) provides that the private security or payment test relates to the
nature of the security for, and the source of, the payment of debt service on an issue.
The private payment portion of the test takes into account the payment of debt service
on the issue that is directly or indirectly to be derived from payments (whether or not to
the issuer or any related party) in respect of property, or borrowed money, used or to be
used for a private use. The private security portion of the test takes into account the
payment of the debt service on the issue that is directly or indirectly secured by any
interest in property used or to be used for a private business use or payments in respect
of property used or to be used for a private business use.

Section 1.141-4(a)(3) provides that the security for, and payment of debt service on, an
issue is determined from both the terms of the bond documents and on the basis of any
underlying arrangement. An underlying arrangement may result from separate

PLR-102461-10 8

agreements between the parties or may be determined on the basis of all of the facts
and circumstances surrounding the issuance of the bonds. For example, if the payment
of debt service on an issue is secured by both a pledge of the full faith and credit of a
state or local governmental unit and any interest in property used or to be used in a
private business use, the issue meets the private security or payment test.

Section 1.141-4(c)(2)(i) provides, in part, that both direct and indirect payments made
by any nongovernmental person that is treated as using proceeds of the issue are taken
into account as private payments to the extent allocable to the proceeds used by that
person. Payments are taken into account as private payments only to the extent that
they are made for the period of time that proceeds are used for a private business use.
Payment for use of proceeds include payments (whether or not to the issuer) in respect
of property financed (directly or indirectly) with those proceeds, even if not made by a
private business user.

Section 1.141-4(d)(2) provides that the property that is the security for, or source of, the
payment of debt service on an issue need not be property financed with proceeds. For
example, unimproved land or investment securities used, directly or indirectly, in a
private business use that secures an issue provides private security. Private security
(other than financed property and private payments) for an issue is taken into account
under § 141(b), however, only to the extent it is provided, directly or indirectly, by a user
of proceeds of the issue.

Section 1.141-4(d)(4) provides that property used for a private business use and
payments in respect of that property are treated as private security if any interest in that
property or payments secures the payment of debt service on the bonds. For purposes
of the previous sentence, the phrase any interest in is to be interpreted broadly and
includes, for example, any right, claim, title, or legal share in property or payments.

Section 1.141-4(d)(5) provides that the payments taken into account as private security
are payments in respect of property used or to be used for a private business use.
Payments made by members of the general public for use of a facility used for a private
business use (for example, a facility that is the subject of a management contract that
results in private business use) are taken into account as private security to the extent
that they are made for the period of time that property is used by a private business
user.

Section 1.141-4(e) provides that for purposes of the private security or payment test,
generally applicable taxes are not taken into account (that is, are not payments from a
nongovernmental person and are not payments in respect of property used for a private
business use). A generally applicable tax is an enforced contribution exacted pursuant
to legislative authority in the exercise of the taxing power that is imposed and collected
for the purpose of raising revenues to be used for governmental purposes. A generally
applicable tax must have a uniform rate that is applied to all persons of the same

PLR-102461-10 9

classification in the appropriate jurisdiction and a generally applicable manner of
determination and collection. A special charge is not a generally applicable tax. For
this purpose, a special charge means a payment for a special privilege granted or
regulatory function, a service rendered, a use of property, or a payment in the nature of
a special assessment to finance capital improvements that is imposed on a limited class
of persons based on benefits received from the capital improvements financed with the
assessment. Thus, a special assessment to finance infrastructure improvements in a
new industrial park (such as sidewalks, streets, streetlights, and utility infrastructure
improvements) that is imposed on a limited class of persons composed of property
owners within the industrial park who benefit from those improvements is a special
charge. By contrast, an otherwise qualified generally applicable tax (such as a
generally applicable ad valorem tax on all real property within a governmental taxing
jurisdiction) is not treated as a special charge merely because the taxes received are
used for governmental or public purposes in a manner which benefits particular property
owners.

  Category B Bonds

The debt service on the Category B Bonds will be paid from the Premium Surcharges
and the Assessments.

The Premium Surcharges are assessed on all policyholders who reside or have
operations in, or whose insured property is located in a catastrophe area for each
insurance policy, other than federal flood insurance, workers’ compensation insurance,
accident and health insurance, and medical malpractice insurance. Thus, the Premium
Surcharges are assessed on a broad base of persons. Furthermore, the Premium
Surcharges are levied solely for the purpose of raising revenue for a governmental
purpose. Provided that the Premium Surcharges are assessed by the Commissioner as
described in the proposed rules, the Premium Surcharges qualify as taxes of general
application for purposes of § 141.

The Assessments charged to all licensed property insurers in State are taxes of general
application for purposes of § 141. The Assessments are not a payment of special
privileges granted or services rendered because the Assessments are paid by all
insurers writing insurance policies in State (an entire class of persons). The
Assessments are levied solely for the purpose of raising revenue for a governmental
purpose and are applied at a uniform rate to all entities of the same classification in
State (i.e., all licensed insurance companies doing business in State).

Because the Premium Surcharges and the Assessments are taxes of general
application, they do not constitute private payments or security. As a result, the
Category B Bonds fail the private security or payment test.

PLR-102461-10 10

Therefore, the Category B Bonds will not constitute private activity bonds unless they
meet the private loan financing test.

  Category C Bonds

The debt service on the Category C Bonds will be paid from additional Assessments.
As discussed above, the Assessments charged to all licensed property insurers in State
are taxes of general application for purposes of § 141.

Because the Assessments are taxes of general application, they do not constitute
private payments or security. As a result, the Category C Bonds fail the private security
or payment test.

Therefore, the Category C Bonds will not constitute private activity bonds unless they
meet the private loan financing test.

Private Loan Financing Test

An issue generally meets the private loan financing test of § 141(c) if the amount of the
proceeds of the issue which is to be used (directly or indirectly) to make loans to
persons other than governmental units exceeds the lesser of 5 percent of the proceeds
or $5,000,000.

Section 1.141-5(a) provides that bonds of an issue are private activity bonds if more
than the lesser of 5 percent or $5,000,000 of the proceeds of the issue is to be used
(directly or indirectly) to make or finance loans to persons other than governmental
persons.

Section 1.141-5(c)(1) provides that any transaction that is generally characterized as a
loan for federal income tax purposes is a loan for purposes of § 1.141-5. For federal tax
purposes, a loan denotes “an advance of money with an absolute promise to repay.”
Bankers Mortgage Co. v. Commissioner, 142 F.2d 130, 131 (5th Cir. 1944). In addition,
a loan may arise from the direct lending of bond proceeds or may arise from
transactions in which indirect benefits that are the economic equivalent of a loan are
conveyed. Thus, the determination of whether a loan is made depends on the
substance of a transaction rather than its form.

Neither the Category B Bonds nor the Category C Bonds meet the private loan
financing test of § 141(c). Persons paying the Assessments and the Premium
Surcharges are required to do so by State law. Those persons who receive payment of
their insurance claims from proceeds of the Bonds receive such payment as a result of
a previously obtained contractual right (under an insurance contract with Association).
A claimant receiving Bond proceeds is not under any obligation to repay any amounts it
receives in satisfaction of its claim. Furthermore, there is no assurance that any

PLR-102461-10 11

claimant who receives Bond proceeds in satisfaction of its claim will continue to contract
with Association for any future insurance coverage. Thus, there is no assurance that
Association will receive any future moneys from any claimant whatsoever.

CONCLUSION

Based on the foregoing, we conclude that Issuer’s Category B Bonds and Category C
Bonds will not be private activity bonds within the meaning of § 141 of the Internal
Revenue Code.

Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the
tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in
this letter. In particular, no opinion is expressed concerning whether the interest on the
Bonds is excludable from gross income under § 103(a).

The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and representations
submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed
by an appropriate party. This office has not verified any of the material submitted in
support of the request for rulings; however, such material is subject to verification on
examination. This letter is based upon the assumption that the proposed rules
described herein will be finalized as set forth herein, and the application of this letter is
conditional on such finalization.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code
provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is
being sent to your authorized representative.

                                    Sincerely,

                                    Associate Chief Counsel
                                    (Financial Institutions & Products)



                                 By: __________________________
                                    Timothy L. Jones
                                    Senior Counsel

Branch 5

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2010, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.