Chief Counsel Advice 1042031 Released October 22, 2010 Advice

CCA 1042031: Federal agencies may coordinate or separately handle excess Social Security withholding

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2010, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2010
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Chief Counsel Advice addressed how two federal agencies should handle Social Security wages paid to the same employee in one calendar year. It stated that the federal government is treated as one employer, so the Social Security wage base applies once to those wages. Under IRC § 3122, the agencies may coordinate to prevent withholding above the wage base, or they may withhold without coordinating. The employee may claim a credit on Form 1040 for excess Social Security taxes, and the agencies may seek a refund or adjustment after year end if they obtain the employee's consent as described in the advice.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: How should two federal agencies handle Social Security taxes when they pay the same employee in one calendar year?
  • Outcome: Advice given
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 3122 and 6413(c)(2)(A)

Full text (IRS public release)

ID: CCA_2010082315575932 Number: 201042031
Release Date: 10/22/2010
Office: -----------------------------
UILC: 3122.00-00

From: --------------------
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2010 3:58:07 PM
To: ----------------------
Cc:
Subject: RE: [ --------------------------- ]


Here is a quick and simple summary of what the letter says:

1) The federal government is considered one big employer, so two federal agencies that pay wages to an
employee in a single calendar year only need to go up the social security wage base one time.

2) Section 3122 gives federal agencies flexibility on how to deal with wage base issues. If both federal
agencies make payments to the same employee in a single calendar year, they can either: i) coordinate
with each other to make sure that no social security tax is paid on wages in excess of the wage base; or
ii) not coordinate with each other and simply withhold and pay social security taxes on wages paid to the
employee without regard to the wage base.

3) Regardless of which option the federal agencies use, the employee can take a credit on their 1040 for
any social security taxes paid on wages exceeding the wage base (see section 6413(c)(2)(A), which
provides that the two federal agencies are treated as separate employers for purposes of the credit
employees get on their 1040 for excess FICA).

4) The agencies could also seek a refund (or adjustment) of FICA paid on wages exceeding the wage
base after the close of the calendar year but if they do this, then they need to go through the process of
seeking the employee's consent to request a refund on the employee's behalf.

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2010, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.