PLR 201042014: IRS grants relief for a possible second class of stock

Number
201042014
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Inadvertent Terminations
Code sections
§ 1361, § 1362, § 6110
Ruling dated
July 9, 2010
Publicly released
October 22, 2010

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2010, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2010
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The IRS considered a corporation's request for relief after a stock purchase agreement gave a trust the right to receive up to the full value of its initial investment if a sale of the corporation resulted in a loss. The IRS concluded that this clause may have created more than one class of stock and may have terminated the corporation's S election. It further concluded that any termination was inadvertent under IRC § 1362(f), because the clause was removed, no payment was made under it, and the corporation and shareholders represented that they acted consistently with S status. The corporation was treated as continuing to be an S corporation from the specified date, provided its election was otherwise valid and was not terminated for another reason.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Can an S corporation receive relief when a stock agreement may have created a second class of stock?
  • Outcome: Approved
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 1361(b), 1362(a), 1362(d)(2), 1362(d)(3), 1362(f), and 6110(k)(3)

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201042014
Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 10/22/2010
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 1362.04-00
Person To Contact:
------------------------------
-------------------, ID No. -------------
------------------------
Telephone Number:
---------------------------------------
---------------------
---------------------------------
Refer Reply To:
CC:PSI:B02
PLR-111838-10
Date:
July 09, 2010

X = -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------

State = -------------

Date = --------------------------
1
Date = ----------------------
2
Date = -------------------
3
=
Date = -----------------------
4
Trust = -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------

n = -----

Dear -------------:

This responds to a letter dated January 20, 2010, and subsequent correspondence, submitted on behalf of X by its authorized representative, requesting a ruling under § 1362(f) of the Internal Revenue Code.

The information submitted states that X was incorporated in State on Date 1. X filed an election to be treated as an S corporation under § 1362 for its taxable year beginning Date 2. On or about Date 3, X sold n shares of its stock to Trust, an eligible
PLR-111838-10
2

S corporation shareholder. Pursuant to the purchase agreement, the n shares were of the same share class and had the same rights and titles as the remaining outstanding shares. However, the purchase agreement contained a clause that allowed Trust to receive up to the full value of its initial investment in the event a sale of X resulted in a loss. On Date 4, X and Trust amended the purchase agreement to remove this clause and eliminate any second class of stock. No payment was ever made under the clause. X and its shareholders then requested inadvertent invalid election relief under § 1362(f).

X represents that the circumstances resulting in the termination of X’s S corporation election were inadvertent and not motivated by tax avoidance. X further represents that from Date 2, X and its shareholders have filed all returns consistent with X’s status as an S corporation. X and its shareholders have agreed to make such adjustments consistent with the treatment of X as an S corporation as may be required by the Secretary.

Section 1362(f) provides that if (1) an election under § 1362(a) by any corporation (A) was not effective for the taxable year for which made (determined without regard to § 1362(b)(2)) by reason of a failure to meet the requirements of § 1361(b) or to obtain shareholder consents or (B) was terminated under § 1362(d)(2) or (3), (2) the Secretary determines that the circumstances resulting in the ineffectiveness or termination were inadvertent, (3) no later than a reasonable period of time after discovery of the circumstances resulting in the ineffectiveness or termination, steps were taken (A) so that the corporation is a small business corporation or (B) to acquire the shareholder consents, and (4) the corporation and each person who was a shareholder of the corporation at any time during the period specified pursuant to § 1362(f), agrees to make such adjustments (consistent with the treatment of the corporation as an S corporation) as may be required by the Secretary with respect to such period, then, notwithstanding the circumstances resulting in the ineffectiveness or termination, the corporation will be treated as an S corporation during the period specified by the Secretary.

Based solely on the information submitted and the representations made, we conclude that X's S corporation election may have terminated because X may have had more than one class of stock. However, we conclude that, if X's S election was terminated, such a termination was inadvertent within the meaning of § 1362(f). Accordingly, pursuant to the provisions of § 1362(f), X will be treated as continuing to be an S corporation from Date 3 and thereafter, provided X’s S election was valid and was not otherwise terminated under § 1362(d).

Except as specifically set forth above, we express no opinion concerning the federal tax consequences of the above-described facts under any other provision of the Code. Specifically, no opinion is expressed on whether X is otherwise eligible to be treated as an S corporation.
PLR-111838-10
3

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

In accordance with the power of attorney on file with this office, we are sending a copy of this letter to X’s authorized representative.

Sincerely,

Bradford R. Poston
Acting Chief, Branch 2
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs & Special Industries)

Enclosures (2):
Copy of this letter
Copy for § 6110 purposes

cc:

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace