CCA 201041040: A purported securities loan did not create indebtedness under section 1366
Apply this to your situation
This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2010, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Chief Counsel’s advice considers whether a purported loan of securities created indebtedness for purposes of section 1366(d)(1)(B). The advice concludes that the transaction did not create that indebtedness. It relies on Deputy v. Du Pont and several revenue rulings addressing related obligations and securities transactions.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Did a purported loan of securities create indebtedness for purposes of section 1366(d)(1)(B)?
- Outcome: Advice given
- Key authorities: IRC § 1366; IRC § 6110(k)(3); Deputy v. Du Pont, 308 U.S. 488 (1940); Rev. Ruls. 95-45, 95-26, and 95-8
Full text (IRS public release)
ID: CCA_2010092710381451 Number: 201041040
Release Date: 10/15/2010
Office: ----------------
UILC: 1366.00-00
From: -------------------
Sent: Monday, September 27, 2010 10:38:17 AM
To: -----------------
Cc: ------------------------
Subject: Section 1366 Indebtedness
We believe that the purported loan of securities at issue here did not create indebtedness for purposes of
section 1366(d)(1)(B). See Deputy v. Du Pont, 308 U.S. 488 (1940) (obligation to close a short sale was
not indebtedness). See also Rev. Rul. 95-45, 1995-26 I.R.B. 4; Rev. Rul. 95-26, 1995-14 I.R.B. 6; Rev.
Rul. 95-8, 1995-4 I.R.B. 29.
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace