PLR 1041030: The IRS granted more time to revoke an investment-income election

Plain-English summary

The IRS granted an individual an additional 60 days to revoke an election that treated qualified dividends and capital gains as investment income for investment-interest purposes. The taxpayer requested relief after an amended Schedule K-1 reduced the investment interest expense originally reported. The IRS found that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and that granting relief would not prejudice the government's interests. The ruling is limited to the extension and does not decide whether the taxpayer is otherwise eligible to make the election.

Ruling snapshot

• Question: May the taxpayer revoke the prior investment-income election after the filing deadline?
• Outcome: Approved
• Key authorities: IRC § 163(d); Treas. Reg. §§ 1.163(d)-1 and 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3; IRC § 6110(k)(3)

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201041030 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 10/15/2010 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 9100.00-00
Person To Contact:
----------------------- --------------------- ------------------------
------------------------ Telephone Number:
------------------------------------------------- -------------------
--------------------------------------------- Refer Reply To:
---------------------------------------- CC:ITA:B03
PLR-115435-10
----------------------- Date:
------------------------- July 07, 2010
------------------------
-------------------------

              TY: -------

Legend

Taxpayer = ------------------------------------------------------
Year 1 = -------
Year 2 = -------
Accounting Firm = --------------------------------------------
Year 3 = -------

Dear ------------------------:

   This is response to a letter dated ---------------------. You requested an extension

of time to elect to revoke an election to treat qualified dividends and capital gains as
investment income under sections 163(d)(1) and 163(d)(4)(B) of the Internal Revenue
Code for Year 1 and section 1.163(d)-(1)(c) of the Income Tax Regulations. The
request to elect to revoke the election is based on sections 301.9100-1 and -3 of the
Procedure and Administration Regulations.

                                                  FACTS

    Taxpayer’s main source of income is investment income and income from

various real estate flow-through entities. Taxpayer timely filed Form 1040, Individual
Income Tax Return, for Year 1. The return was prepared using computerized tax return
preparation software. Taxpayer's Year 1 return included Form 4952, Investment Interest
Expense Deduction, on which they elected to treat all net long-term capital gain and
qualified dividends as investment income. The effect of electing to treat qualified
dividends and net capital gains as investment income is to tax the qualified dividends
and net capitals gains at ordinary income tax rates. In prior years, Taxpayer had
consistently elected on Form 4952 to include all qualified dividends and net capital gain
in investment income.
PLR-115435-10 2

   The majority of investment interest expense reported on Form 4952 was passed

through from a flow-through entity owned by Taxpayer. The interest expense reported
on the associated partnership Schedule K-1 was interest expense allocated to debt-
financed distributions. It is represented that the related interest expense was properly
reported as investment interest expense on the Year 1 Form 1040. Also, a tracing
analysis determined that Taxpayer deposited the debt-financed partnership distributions
into Taxpayer’s brokerage account, which generated interest and dividend income, as
well as capital gains.

   The original Schedule K-1 was prepared by Accounting Firm and there was an

inadvertent error made with respect to the calculation of interest expense associated
with debt-financed distribution interest. In Year 3, Taxpayer received an amended Form
1065, Schedule K-1 for Year 1, which reported significantly less investment interest
expense allocated to Taxpayer. This amended Schedule K-1 reclassified investment
interest expense to interest expense directly related to the rental trade or business.
Once the amended Schedule K-1 was received, it became apparent that the election
under section 163(d)(4)(B)(iii) on the Year 1 return would no longer be necessary to
maximize the investment interest expense deduction.

   Taxpayer made the election under section 163(d)(4)(B)(iii) based on the

information available at the time the Year 1 return was prepared. Taxpayer had no
control over the amendment of the Schedule K-1, and could not have known that the
Year 1 Schedule K-1 was erroneous, or that there would be a change to the K-1
subsequent to the filing of the Year 1 return. The Schedule K-1 from this partnership
had never been amended in the past, and Taxpayer had no reason to believe that an
amended Schedule K-1 would be forthcoming.

   It is represented that Taxpayer relied on Accounting Firm to accurately prepare

the partnership return and was not aware of the inadvertent error at the time the Year 1
return was filed. It is further represented that it was only when the Year 2 partnership
return was prepared, that the error was discovered. As a result, Taxpayer seeks
permission to revoke the election.

                               LAW & ANALYSIS

   Section 163(d)(1) provides that, in the case of a taxpayer other than a

corporation, the amount allowed as a deduction for investment interest shall not exceed
the net investment income of the taxpayer for the taxable year. Investment interest
expense that is disallowed by section 163(d)(1) may be carried to the next taxable year.
Section 163(d)(2).

  Section 163(d)(4)(B) provides, in part, that investment income is the sum of –

PLR-115435-10 3

          (i) gross income from property held for investment (other than gain taken

into account under clause (ii)(I)),
(ii) the excess (if any) of
(I) the net gain attributable to the disposition of property held for
investment, over
(II) the net capital gain determined by only taking into account gains
and losses from dispositions of property held for investment, plus
(iii) so much of the net capital gain referred to in clause (ii)(I) as the
taxpayer elects to take into account under such clause.

   Section 163(d)(4)(B) also states that such term shall include qualified dividend

income (as defined in section (1)(h)(ii)(B)) only to the extent the taxpayer elects to treat
such income as investment income for purposes of this subsection.

   Section 1.163(d)-1(b) of the regulations provides that the election under section

163(d)(4)(B) must be made on or before the due date (including extensions) of the
income tax return for the taxable year in which the qualified dividend income is received
or net capital gain is recognized.

  Section 1.163(d)-1(c) of the regulations provides that the election under section

163(d)(4)(B)(iii) is revocable with the consent of the Commissioner.

  Under section 301.9100-1(c), the Commissioner has discretion to grant a

reasonable extension of time to make a regulatory election under all subtitles of the
Code, except subtitles E, G, H and I, provided that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in
good faith and granting relief will not prejudice the interests of the government.

    Section 301.9100-3 provides extensions of time to make a regulatory election

under Code sections other than those for which section 301.9100-2 expressly permits
automatic extensions. Requests for extensions of time for regulatory elections will be
granted when the taxpayer provides evidence to establish to the satisfaction of the
Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith and granting relief
will not prejudice the interests of the government.

  Section 301.9100-3(b)(1) states that a taxpayer will be deemed to have acted

reasonably and in good faith if the taxpayer –
(i) requests relief before the failure to make the regulatory election is
discovered by the Service;
(ii) inadvertently failed to make the election because of intervening events
beyond the taxpayer’s control;
(iii) failed to make the election because, after exercising due diligence, the
taxpayer was unaware of the necessity for the election;
(iv) reasonably relied on the written advice of the Service; or
PLR-115435-10 4

          (v) reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional, and the tax

professional failed to make, or advise the taxpayer to make, the election.

   Taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith because Taxpayer’s failure to make

a timely election was due to intervening events that were beyond Taxpayer’s control.
These intervening events include the amendment of the Year 1 Schedule K-1.

     Under section 301.9100-3(b)(3), a taxpayer will not be considered to have acted

reasonably and in good faith if the taxpayer –
(i) seeks to alter a return position for which an accuracy related penalty
has been or could be imposed under section 6662 at the time the taxpayer requests
relief (taking into account section 1.6664-02(c)(3)) and the new position requires a
regulatory election for which relief is requested;
(ii) was informed in all material respects of the required election and
related tax consequences, but chose not to file the election; or
(iii) uses hindsight in requesting relief. If specific facts have changed
since the original deadline that make the election advantageous to a taxpayer, the
Service will not ordinarily grant relief.

   Taxpayer is not seeking to alter a return position for which an accuracy-related

penalty has been or could be imposed under section 6662 at the time relief is
requested. Because of the incorrect Year 1 Schedule K-1 Taxpayer received, Taxpayer
had not been informed in all material respects of the election and its tax consequences.
Furthermore, Taxpayer is not using hindsight in requesting relief. Taxpayer has
represented that specific facts have not changed since the original deadline that made
the election advantageous.

    Section 301.9100-3(c)(1)(i) provides, in part, that the interests of the government

are prejudiced if granting relief would result in the taxpayer having a lower tax liability in
the aggregate for all taxable years affected by the election than the taxpayer would
have had if the election had been timely made (taking into account the time value of
money). Section 301.9100-3(c)(1)(ii) provides, in part, that the interests of the
government are ordinarily prejudiced if the taxable year in which the regulatory election
should have been made, or any taxable years that would have been affected by the
election had it been timely made, are closed by the period of limitations on assessment.
Under these criteria, the interests of the government are not prejudiced in this case.
Taxpayer has represented that granting relief would not result in a lower tax liability in
the aggregate for all taxable years affected by the election than Taxpayer would have
had if the election had been timely made (taking into account the time value of money).
Furthermore, the taxable year in which the regulatory election should have been made
and any taxable years that would have been affected had it been timely made, are not
closed by the period of assessment.

                                      RULING

PLR-115435-10 5

   Accordingly, the consent of the Commissioner is hereby granted for an extension

of time pursuant to sections 301.9100-1 and -3 for Taxpayer to revoke the prior Year 1
election pursuant to section 163(d)(4)(B) and section 1.163(d)-1(c) of the regulations.
Taxpayer has an extension of 60 days from the date of this ruling in which to make this
election.

   This ruling is limited to providing an extension of time to elect to revoke the

election under section 163(d)(4)(B). It does not provide relief from any liability incurred
as a result of filing a late election; nor is it a ruling that the taxpayer is otherwise eligible
to make the election. No opinion is expressed as to the applicability of any other
provision of the Code or the regulations which may be applicable under these facts.

  This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of

the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

     In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this

letter is being sent to your authorized representative.

   A copy of this letter must be attached to any income tax return to which it is

relevant. Alternatively, taxpayers filing their returns electronically may satisfy this
requirement by attaching a statement to their return that provides the date and control
number of the letter ruling.

  The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and

representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury
statement executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of
the material submitted in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on
examination.

                                     Sincerely,



                                     Christopher F. Kane
                                     Branch Chief, Branch 3
                                     (Income Tax & Accounting)