PLR 1040003: Retiree health trust income excluded under section 115
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2010, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The IRS ruled that a trust funded by a city to provide health benefits to the city's eligible retirees and their dependents performs an essential governmental function. The trust's income will accrue to the city and will be excluded from gross income under IRC § 115(1), based on the trust's structure and restrictions on its assets. The IRS also ruled that the arrangement is classified as a trust under the applicable regulations and is not required to file an annual income tax return under IRC § 6012(a)(4). The ruling did not address the federal tax treatment of contributions or benefit payments under the city's health plans.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Does a city-funded retiree health benefits trust qualify for section 115 income exclusion and trust classification?
- Outcome: Approved
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 115, 6012, and 7701; Treas. Reg. §§ 301.7701-1 and 301.7701-4
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 201040003 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 10/8/2010 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 115.00-00, 115.00-07,
6012.05-01, 7701.03-08 Person To Contact:
-----------------------, ID No. -------------------
---------------------- ---------------------------------------------------
------------- Telephone Number:
------------------------------------------------------------ ---------------------
------- Refer Reply To:
------------------------------ CC:TEGE:EOEG:EO2
---------------------------- PLR-155635-09
Date:
March 30, 2010
Legend
Trust = --------------------------------------------------------------------
State = ---------
City = -----------------------------
Dear ----------------------:
This is in reply to your letter dated November 19, 2009, and subsequent
correspondence in which you request various rulings on behalf of the Trust.
FACTS
The City is a State municipal corporation. The City is governed by its City
Council. The Trustees and the City adopted a trust agreement (Trust Agreement)
creating the Trust in order to provide eligible retirees of the City and their dependents
with health care benefits in accordance with the terms of the City’s underlying program
of Medical and Dental Plans (Plans).
The Trust has a Board of Trustees consisting of five members. Three of the
board members are ex officio, consisting of the City’s Director of Finance/City
Treasurer, the City’s Director of Human Resources and the City’s Assistant Director of
Finance for Accounting and Financial Reporting. Two of the Trustees are elected from
those retired employees of the City who actively participate in the Plans by the
beneficiaries of the Plans who are of legal age and currently receiving health care
benefits under the Plans. Under the terms of the Trust Agreement, the Mayor of the
City, with the approval the City Council, may remove and replace a trustee of the Trust
at any time, in accordance with the State Municipal Code. In the event of the Trustee's
removal or resignation, a successor ex officio Trustee will be appointed by the City. A
PLR-155635-09 2
successor elected Trustee shall be elected for the unexpired term at a special election
called by the City.
Except for investment income, the income of the Trust consists solely of
contributions from the City. The Trust will not allow or accept employee contributions,
except as might be permitted under the Internal Revenue Code (“Code”). The City
represents that there are no current or past employee contributions to the Trust and that
the Trust will not accept future employee contributions without a written determination
by the Internal Revenue Service (“Service”) that the Trust will continue to qualify as an
ordinary trust within the meaning of § 7701(a) of the Code and § 301.7701-4(a) of the
Procedure and Administration Regulations. The Trust Agreement provides, in general,
that no portion of the principal or income of the Trust shall revert to the City, or shall be
used for or diverted to any purpose other than to provide health and welfare benefits to
retirees and their dependents and to pay reasonable expenses of the Trust.
The Trust assets are only available to pay post-employment health care benefits
of the employees of the City and their dependents. The Trust Agreement provides that
the Trustees shall receive and accept all contributions and shall hold, reinvest, manage,
administer, and distribute property and the increments, proceeds, earnings, and income
solely to provide health and welfare benefits to retirees and their dependents. The
Trustees may invest the Trust assets in such securities or property as the Trustees deem
advisable; provided, however that investments generally shall be so diversified as to
minimize the risk of large losses.
No private interests participate in or benefit from the operation of the Trust other
than for reasonable payment as providers of goods or services. No amendment of the
Trust Agreement by the Trustees shall divert the corpus or income of the Trust to a
purpose other than providing post-employment health care benefits. The City will
amend the Trust Agreement to provide that upon liquidation or dissolution of the Trust
any assets remaining after payment of retirement benefits and expenses shall be
distributed to the City for municipal purposes.
LAW AND ANALYSIS
Section 115(1) of the Code provides that gross income does not include income
derived from any public utility or the exercise of any essential government function and
accruing to a state or any political subdivision thereof.
In Rev. Rul. 77-261, 1977-2 C.B. 45, income from an investment fund,
established under a written declaration of trust by a state, for the temporary investment
of cash balances of the state and its participating political subdivisions, was excludable
from gross income for federal income tax purposes under § 115(1) of the Code. The
ruling indicated that the statutory exclusion was intended to extend not to the income of
a state or municipality resulting from its own participation in activities, but rather to the
PLR-155635-09 3
income of a corporation or other entity engaged in the operation of a public utility or the
performance of some governmental function that accrued to either a state or
municipality. The ruling points out that it may be assumed that Congress did not desire
in any way to restrict a state’s participation in enterprises that might be useful in carrying
out projects that are desirable from the standpoint of a state government and which are
within the ambit of a sovereign to properly conduct. In addition, pursuant to section
6012(a)(2) of the Code and the underlying regulations, the investment fund, being
classified as a corporation that is subject to taxation under subtitle A of the Code, was
required to file a federal income tax return each year.
In Rev. Rul. 90-74, 1990-2 C.B. 34, the Service determined that the income of an
organization formed, funded, and operated by political subdivisions to pool various risks
(casualty, public liability, workers’ compensation, and employees’ health) is excludable
from gross income under § 115 of the Code. In Rev. Rul. 90-74, private interests
neither materially participate in the organization nor benefit more than incidentally from
the organization.
The Trust provides health benefits to retired employees of the City, their
dependents and survivors. Providing health benefits to former public employees
constitutes the performance of an essential government function. Based upon Rev. Rul.
90-74 and Rev. Rul. 77-261, the Trust performs an essential governmental function
within the meaning of § 115(1) of the Code.
The income of the Trust accrues to the City. No private interests participate in or
benefit from the operation of the Trust other than as providers of goods or services.
The Trust’s dedication of its corpus or income exclusively for the benefit of the retirees
and their dependents satisfies an obligation the City has assumed or been assigned
with respect to providing health benefits to its employees. The benefit to the City’s
participating employees and their dependents is incidental to the public benefit. See
Rev. Rul. 90-74.
Section 301.7701-1(b) of the Procedure and Administration Regulations provides
that the classification of organizations that are recognized as separate entities is
determined under § 301.7701-2; § 301.7701-3 and § 301.7701-4 unless a provision of
the Code provides for special treatment of that organization.
Section 301.7701-4(a) provides that, in general, an arrangement will be treated
as a trust if it can be shown that the purpose of the arrangement is to vest in trustees
responsibility for the protection and conservation of property for beneficiaries who
cannot share in the discharge of this responsibility and, therefore, are not associates in a
joint enterprise for the conduct of business for profit.
The City's contributions to the Trust are to be used to pay retiree health benefits
for eligible retired employees and their dependents. The Trustee is charged with the
PLR-155635-09 4
responsibility of the protection and conservation of the Trust property for the benefit of
the beneficiaries of the Trust. The beneficiaries of the Trust cannot share in the
discharge of the Trustee's responsibility for the protection and conservation of property
and, therefore, are not associates in a joint enterprise for the conduct of business for
profit. Assuming that the Trust is recognized as a separate entity under § 301.7701-1,
we conclude that the Trust is a trust under § 301.7701-4(a).
Section 6012(a)(4) of the Code provides that every trust having for the taxable
year any taxable income or having gross income of $600 or over, regardless of the
amount of taxable income, shall make returns with respect to income taxes under
Subtitle A.
Based on the information and representations submitted by the Trust, we
conclude as follows:
(1) As of the effective date of the proposed amendment to the Trust as described
above, the income of the Trust will be derived from the exercise of an essential
governmental function and will accrue to a state or a political subdivision thereof for
purposes of § 115(1) of the Code. Accordingly, the Trust’s income will be excludable
from gross income under § 115(1) of the Code.
(2) The Trust is classified as a trust within the meaning of § 7701(a) of the Code
and § 301.7701-4(a) of the regulations. The Trust is not required to file an annual
income tax return under § 6012(a)(4) of the Code.
Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied
concerning the tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or
referenced in this letter. No opinion is expressed concerning the Federal tax
consequences of the Trust under any other provision of the Code other than those
specifically cited above. In particular, no representation is made that contributions or
premiums paid to the City’s Plans or payments of benefits to employees, former
employees, retirees, spouses or eligible dependents pursuant to the Plans will be tax-
free. The Trust has obtained a ruling concerning only the Federal tax treatment of the
Trust’s income. That ruling may not be cited or relied upon by the Trust whatsoever as
precedent concerning any matter relating to the taxation of contributions or benefits
under the Plans. The Federal tax consequences to employees, former employees,
retirees, spouses and eligible dependents depend on the terms and operation of the
Plans.
This ruling letter is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3)
of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this
letter is being sent to your authorized representative.
PLR-155635-09 5
The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and representations
submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed
by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted
in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on examination.
Sincerely,
Sylvia F. Hunt
Assistant Branch Chief, EO Branch 2
(Tax Exempt & Government Entities)
Enclosure: copy for § 6110 purposes
cc:
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2010, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.