Acceleration of advance payments did not apply under the facts presented
Apply this to your situation
This page covers IRS technical advice on one taxpayer's case, issued in 2010, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The IRS reconsidered the second issue in Technical Advice Memorandum 200725029 concerning advance payments. The Service had previously agreed that the amounts were advance payments under Rev. Proc. 2004-34 but concluded that an acceleration provision required including them in the year received. After reconsideration, the IRS concluded that the acceleration provision did not apply on the facts presented. The memorandum directs that a copy be provided to the taxpayer.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Did the acceleration provision for advance payments require inclusion of the amounts in the year received?
- Outcome: Advice given
- Key authorities: IRC § 451; Rev. Proc. 2004-34, §§ 4.01 and 5.02(5)(b)
Full text (IRS public release)
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
NATIONAL OFFICE TECHNICAL ADVICE MEMORANDUM
June 28, 2010
Third Party Communication: None
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Number: 201039024
Release Date: 10/1/2010
Index (UIL) No.: 451.13-01
CASE-MIS No.: TAM-122006-10
-------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------
----------------------------------
Taxpayer's Name: ---------------
Taxpayer's Address: ----------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------
-----------------------------------
Taxpayer's Identification No.: ----------------
Years Involved: ----------------------
Date of Conference: ---------------------------
The conclusion reached in addressing the second issue in Technical Advice Memorandum 200725029 has been reconsidered and is now revoked. With respect to the second issue in the memorandum, the Service agreed with the taxpayer and concluded that the amounts at issue are advance payments within the meaning of section 4.01 of Rev. Proc. 2004-34, 2004-1 C.B. 991. However, the Service also concluded that, because the taxpayer’s obligations with respect to the payments are satisfied as the payments are received, the amounts must be included in the year of receipt pursuant to the acceleration provision of section 5.02(5)(b) of Rev. Proc. 2004-34. After reconsideration, we now conclude that the acceleration provision does not apply under the facts of this case.
A copy of this technical advice memorandum is to be given to the taxpayer. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This advice addressed one taxpayer's case and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace