Technical Advice Memorandum 1039024 Released October 1, 2010 Advice

Acceleration of advance payments did not apply under the facts presented

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2010, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2010
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The IRS reconsidered the second issue in Technical Advice Memorandum 200725029 concerning advance payments. The Service had previously agreed that the amounts were advance payments under Rev. Proc. 2004-34 but concluded that an acceleration provision required including them in the year received. After reconsideration, the IRS concluded that the acceleration provision did not apply on the facts presented. The memorandum directs that a copy be provided to the taxpayer.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Did the acceleration provision for advance payments require inclusion of the amounts in the year received?
  • Outcome: Advice given
  • Key authorities: IRC § 451; Rev. Proc. 2004-34, §§ 4.01 and 5.02(5)(b)

Full text (IRS public release)

                        INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
              NATIONAL OFFICE TECHNICAL ADVICE MEMORANDUM

                                             June 28, 2010

                                                  Third Party Communication: None
                                                  Date of Communication: Not Applicable

Number: 201039024
Release Date: 10/1/2010
Index (UIL) No.: 451.13-01
CASE-MIS No.: TAM-122006-10

-------------------------------------------------------------------


     Taxpayer's Name:                             ---------------
     Taxpayer's Address:                          ----------------------------------------
                                                  ----------------------------------------------------
                                                  -----------------------------
                                                  -----------------------------------
     Taxpayer's Identification No.:               ----------------
     Years Involved:                              ----------------------
     Date of Conference:                          ---------------------------

The conclusion reached in addressing the second issue in Technical Advice
Memorandum 200725029 has been reconsidered and is now revoked. With respect to
the second issue in the memorandum, the Service agreed with the taxpayer and
concluded that the amounts at issue are advance payments within the meaning of
section 4.01 of Rev. Proc. 2004-34, 2004-1 C.B. 991. However, the Service also
concluded that, because the taxpayer’s obligations with respect to the payments are
satisfied as the payments are received, the amounts must be included in the year of
receipt pursuant to the acceleration provision of section 5.02(5)(b) of Rev. Proc.
2004-34. After reconsideration, we now conclude that the acceleration provision does
not apply under the facts of this case.

A copy of this technical advice memorandum is to be given to the taxpayer. Section
6110(k)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code provides that it may not be used or cited as
precedent.

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2010, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.