PLR 201036027: IRS approved a judicial-system excess benefit arrangement under section 415(m)

Number
201036027
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Limitations on Benefits and Contributions Under Qualified Plans
Code sections
§ 83, § 115, § 401, § 402, § 414, § 415, § 501, § 6110
Ruling dated
June 24, 2010
Publicly released
September 10, 2010

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2010, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2010
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The IRS ruled that an excess benefit plan for state court personnel qualified as a governmental excess benefit arrangement under IRC § 415(m). The plan would provide benefits limited by the statutory cap for governmental defined benefit plans, would be funded separately on a pay-as-you-go basis, and would not permit participants to defer compensation. The IRS also ruled that benefits would be taxable when paid or made available and that income accruing to the arrangement would be exempt under IRC §§ 115 and 415(m)(1). The ruling assumed that the underlying plan was a governmental plan and qualified under the stated provisions.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Does the excess benefit plan qualify under IRC § 415(m), and how are its benefits and income taxed?
  • Outcome: Approved
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 83, 115, 401, 402, 414, 415, and 501

Full text (IRS public release)

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 9010360 2%

INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

COMMISSIONER
TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES

Uniform Issue List: 415.00-00

SE: T: EB RATS

Attention:
Legend:

| System X =
State S =
Plan X =

Excess Plan X

Dear

This is in response to correspondence dated October 20, 2006, as supplemented by correspondence dated December 8, 2008, March 11, 2009, and September 15, 2009, submitted on behalf of System X by its authorized representatives, in which a request for a letter ruling was submitted with respect to the applicability of section 415(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) to an excess benefit plan (Excess Plan X) and the tax consequences related thereto.

The following facts and representations have been submitted under penalty of perjury in support of the rulings requested:

State S sponsors Plan X on behalf of its eligible employees, who are the justices and judges of the State S Supreme Court, Court of Criminal Appeals, Workers’ Compensation Court, Court of Appeals and District Courts, and the Administrative Director of the Courts. The governing provisions for Plan X are statutorily promulgated by the State S Legislature. Your authorized representatives have represented that Plan X is a defined benefit plan, a governmental plan as described in section 414(d) of the Code, and is qualified under section 401(a) of the Code. System X, an instrumentality of State S, is the administrator of Plan X. System X is governed by a Board of Trustees.

Participation in Plan X is mandatory for all eligible employees, who participate immediately upon election or appointment.

901036022

Page 2

Employee and employer contribution rates to Plan X are established by the State S Legislature. All Plan X participants pay a uniform contribution rate of eight percent of compensation. State S picks up these mandatory contributions within the meaning of section 414(h)(2) of the Code. In addition, State S contributes three percent of

compensation, an amount which increases each year after fiscal year 20. , reaching percent in fiscal year 20.

State S statutes provide for the establishment of qualified excess benefit arrangements within the meaning of section 415(m) of the Code. Pursuant to this authority, on May 11, 20 , System X’s Board of Trustees adopted Excess Plan X for the benefit of employees of State S who participate in Plan X. Excess Plan X will operate in accordance with section 415(m) of the Code as a qualified governmental excess benefit arrangement. State S employees who participate in Plan X will become eligible for benefits from Excess Plan X if their benefits calculated under the benefit formula are limited by section 415(b) of the Code as that section applies to governmental plans. Participation in Excess Plan X is mandatory and automatic for all participants in Plan X whose Plan X retirement benefit is limited by Code section 415.

Section 4.01 of Excess Plan X provides that a participant will receive a benefit equal to the amount of retirement benefits that would have been payable to, or with respect to, a participant by Plan X that could not be paid because of the application of the limitations on retirement benefits under section 415(b) of the Code (“excess benefit”). An excess

benefit under Excess Plan X will be paid only if and to the extent the participant is receiving retirement benefits from Plan X.

Excess Plan X is administered by System X’s Board of Trustees, which has established a separate trust fund for segregation of the assets related to Excess Plan X. This trust fund was established solely for the purpose of holding employer contributions intended to pay excess benefits to affected Excess Plan X participants. The trust fund was designed as a grantor trust for state law and federal income tax purposes. You have represented that the participants will receive no property right or interest in the trust assets, and that the trust assets are subject to the claims of State S’s general creditors

in the event of insolvency. The trustees of this separate trust fund will be System X’s Board of Trustees.

Excess Plan X will be funded on a pay-as-you-go basis. System X’s Board of Trustees will determine the amount necessary to pay the excess benefits under Excess Plan X for each plan year. The required contribution will be the aggregate of the excess benefits payable to all affected participants for such plan year and an amount determined by the Board to be a necessary and reasonable expense of administering Excess Plan X. The amount so determined will be paid by State S and deposited into the trust fund. Under no circumstances will State S’s contributions to fund the excess benefits under Excess Plan X be credited to the trust established to fund Plan X. Any contributions not used to pay the excess benefits for a current plan year, together with any income accruing to the trust fund, will be used to pay the administrative expenses of Excess Plan X for the plan year. Any contributions not so used that remain after the payment of administration expenses will be used to fund excess benefits of participants in future plan years.

Benefits under Excess Plan X will be paid only if and to the extent that the participant is receiving benefits from Plan X. Participation in Excess Plan X will cease for any portion

Page 3 901 036027

of a plan year in which the participant's benefit under Plan X does not exceed the requisite limitations of section 415(b) of the Code, or if all benefit obligations under Excess Plan X to the retiree or beneficiary have been satisfied. The form of the benefits paid to a participant from Excess Plan X will be the same form as the participant's retirement benefit under Plan X. A participant in Excess Plan X will be paid the amount of the benefit that would otherwise have been payable to the participant under Plan X except for the limitations of section 415(b). The excess benefit to which a participant is entitled under Excess Plan X will be paid commencing during or with the month in which all monthly payments of retirement benefits under Plan X are paid. Under no circumstances will the participant be given any election to defer compensation under Excess Plan X, either directly or indirectly. In addition, System X represents that there will be no employee contributions to Excess Plan X.

Although Excess Plan X is a part of Plan X, no assets of Plan X will be used to pay any benefits under Excess Plan X. Excess Plan X is intended to grant a participant no more than a mere contractual right to payment of benefits under Excess Plan X. Employer contributions to Excess Plan X’s related trust may not be commingled with assets of Plan X’s related trust, nor may Excess Plan X receive any transfers from Plan X. Under

no circumstances will employer contributions to fund the excess benefits under Excess Plan X be credited to Plan X.

Based upon the facts and representations stated above, the following rulings are © requested:

  1. Excess Plan X is a qualified governmental excess benefit arrangement within the
    meaning of section 415(m) of the Code.

  2. The benefits payable under Excess Plan X will be includible in gross income for the
    taxable year or years in which such benefits are paid or otherwise made available to a participant or a participant’s beneficiary in accordance with the terms of Excess Plan X.

  3. Income accruing to Excess Plan X is exempt from federal income tax under Code

sections 115 and 415(m)(1) as income derived from the exercise of an essential governmental function.

Pursuant to correspondence dated December 8, 20__, your authorized representatives withdrew a previously requested fourth ruling.

Section 415(b) of the Code sets forth the limitations on benefits for participants in defined benefit plans.

Section 415(m) of the Code sets forth the treatment of qualified governmental excess benefit arrangements. Section 415(m)(1) provides, in part, that in determining whether a governmental plan (as defined in section 414(d)) meets the requirements of section 415,

benefits provided under a qualified governmental excess benefit arrangement shall not be taken into account.

Section 415(m)(3) of the Code defines such an arrangement as a portion of a governmental plan which meets the following three requirements: (A) such portion is maintained solely for the purpose of providing to participants in the plan that part of the

Page 4 901 0360272

participant’s annual benefit otherwise payable under the terms of the plan that exceeds the limitations on benefits imposed by section 415 (“excess benefits”); (B) under such portion no election is provided at any time to the participant (directly or indirectly) to defer compensation; and (C) excess benefits are not paid from a trust forming a part of

such governmental plan unless such trust is maintained solely for the purpose of providing such benefits.

With respect to your first requested ruling, Excess Plan X was adopted by System X’s Board of Trustees as a part of Plan X. It has been represented that Plan X is a governmental plan as described in section 414(d) of the Code. It has also been represented that the only purpose of Excess Plan X is to provide affected employees of State S who participate in Plan X that portion of their benefits that would otherwise be payable under the terms of Plan X except for the limitations on benefits imposed by section 415(b) of the Code, as applicable to governmental plans. The terms of Excess Plan X limit participation to participants in Plan X for whom benefits would exceed the limits of section 415 of the Code. Therefore, we have determined that Excess Plan X is a portion of a governmental plan which is maintained solely for the purpose of providing to State S employees who participate in Plan X that part of the participants’ benefits otherwise payable under the terms of the Plan X that exceed the section 415 limits, and, as such, meets the requirements of section 415(m)(3)A).

Your authorized representatives have stated that participation in Excess Plan X is mandatory and automatic, and that there are no employee contributions to Excess Plan X. Your representatives also assert that no direct or indirect election to defer compensation is provided to any participant in Excess Plan X. Thus, we have determined that no direct or indirect election is provided at any time to participants to defer compensation, and, accordingly, the requirements of section 41 5(m)(3)(B) are met.

Section 415(m)(3)(C) of the Code requires that the trust from which the excess benefits are paid must not form a part of the governmental plan which contains the excess benefit arrangement, unless such trust is maintained solely for the purpose of providing such benefits. In this case, Excess Plan X will be funded on a pay-as-you-go basis. System X’s Board of Trustees established a trust fund for the segregation of assets related to Excess Plan X which is maintained separately from Plan X. This trust fund was established solely for the purpose of holding employer contributions intended to pay excess benefits to affected Plan X participants. Contributions to the trust fund will consist only of the amounts required to pay the excess benefits and administrative expenses for the plan year. Any contributions not used to pay the excess benefits for a current plan year, together with any income accruing to the trust fund, will be used to pay the administrative expenses of Excess Plan X for the plan year. Any contributions not so used that remain after the payment of administration expenses will be used to fund excess benefits of participants in future years. Therefore, we have determined that the requirements of section 415(m)(3)(C) are met.

Since Excess Plan X satisfies all of the requirements of section 415(m)(3) of the Code, we conclude with respect to your first ruling request that Excess Plan X is a qualified

governmental excess benefit arrangement within the meaning of section 415(m) of the Code.

Page 5

201036022

With respect to the second requested ruling, section 415(m)(2) of the Code provides that for purposes of this chapter, (A) the taxable year or years for which amounts in respect of a qualified governmental excess benefit arrangement are includible in gross income by a participant, and (B) the treatment of such amounts when so includible by the participant, shall be determined as if such qualified governmental excess benefit arrangement were treated as a plan for the deferral of compensation which is maintained

by a corporation not exempt from tax under this chapter and which does not meet the requirements for qualification under section 401.

Ruling 1 has already determined that Excess Plan X meets the legal requirements of section 415(m) of the Code for qualified governmental excess benefit arrangements. Accordingly, the tax treatment of the amounts distributed under Excess Plan X to the participants is determined as if such qualified governmental excess benefit arrangement was treated as a plan for the deferral of compensation which is maintained by a corporation not exempt from tax under this chapter and which does not meet the requirements for qualification under section 401.

Section 83(a) of the Code provides that the excess (if any) of the fair market value of property transferred in connection with the performance of services over the amount paid (if any) for the property is includible in the gross income of the person who performed the services for the first taxable year in which the property becomes transferable or is not subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture.

Section 1.83-3(e) of the Income Tax Regulations (regulations) provides that for purposes of section 83, the term “property” includes real and personal property other than money or an unfunded and unsecured promise to pay money or property in the future. Property also includes a beneficial interest in assets (including money) transferred or set aside from claims of the transferor’s creditors, for example, in a trust or escrow account. .

Section 402(b) of the Code provides that contributions made by an employer to an employee’s trust that is not exempt from tax under section 501(a) are included in the employee’s gross income in accordance with section 83, except that the value of the employee’s interest in the trust will be substituted for the fair market value of the property in applying section 83. Under section 1.402(b)-1(a)(1) of the regulations, an employer's contributions to a nonexempt employee’s trust are included as compensation in the employee’s gross income for the taxable year in which the contribution is made, but only to the extent that the employee’s interest in such contribution is substantially vested, as defined in the regulations under section 83.

Section 451(a) of the Code and section 1.451-1(a) of the regulations provide that an item of gross income is includible in gross income for the taxable year in which actually or constructively received by a taxpayer using the cash receipts and disbursements method of accounting. Under section 1.451-2(a) of the regulations, income is constructively received in the taxable year during which it is credited to a taxpayer's account, set apart, or otherwise made available so that the taxpayer may draw on it at any time. However, income is not constructively received if the taxpayer's control of its receipt is subject to substantial limitations or restrictions.

Page 201036027

Various revenue rulings have considered the tax consequences of nonqualified deferred compensation arrangements. Rev. Rul. 60-31, Situations 1-3, 1960-1 C.B. 174, holds that a mere promise to pay, not represented by notes or secured in any way, does not constitute receipt of income within the meaning of the cash receipts and disbursements method of accounting. See also Rev. Rul. 69-650, 1969-2 C.B. 106, and Rev. Rul. 69- 649, 1969-2 C.B. 106.

Under the economic benefit doctrine, an employee has currently includible income from an economic or financial benefit received as compensation, though not in cash form. Economic benefit applies when assets are unconditionally and irrevocably paid into a fund or trust to be used for the employee’s sole benefit. Sproull v. Commissioner, 16 T.C. 244 (1951), aff'd per curiam, 194 F.2d 541 (6 Cir. 1952), Rev. Rul. 60-31, Situation

  1. In Rev. Rul. 72-25, 1972-1 C.B. 127, and Rev. Rul. 68-99, 1968-1 C. B. 193, an
    employee does not receive income as a result of the employer’s purchase of an insurance contract to provide a source of funds for deferred compensation because the insurance contract is the employer's asset, subject to claims of the employer’s creditors.

Accordingly, with respect to the second ruling request, we conclude that the benefits payable under Excess Plan X will be includible in gross income for the taxable year or years in which such benefits are paid or otherwise made available to a participant or a participant’s beneficiary in accordance with the terms of Excess Plan X.

With respect to your third requested ruling, Code section 415(m)(1) provides that income accruing to a governmental plan (or to a trust that is maintained solely for the purpose of providing benefits under a qualified governmental excess benefit arrangement) in respect of a qualified governmental excess benefit arrangement will constitute income derived from the exercise of an essential governmental function upon which such governmental plan (or trust) will be exempt from tax under section 115. Ruling 1 has already determined that Excess Plan X meets the legal requirements of section 415(m) of the Code for qualified governmental excess benefit arrangements.

Accordingly, with respect to your third requested ruling, we conclude that income accruing to Excess Plan X is exempt from federal income tax under Code sections 115

and 415(m)(1) as income derived from the exercise of an essential governmental function.

No opinion is expressed as to the tax treatment of the transactions described herein under the provisions of any other section of either the Code or regulations which may be applicable thereto.

This letter assumes that Plan X is and was a governmental plan as described in section 414(d) of the Code, is and was qualified under section 401, and its related trust is and was exempt from tax under section 501(a) at all times relevant thereto.

This ruling is contingent upon the adoption of the amendment to Excess Plan X, as Stated in the correspondence dated December 8, 20

This letter is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

Page 7 201036027

Pursuant to a power of attorney on file with this office, a copy of this ruling letter is being sent to your authorized representatives. If you wish to inquire about this ruling, please contact . Please address all correspondence to SE:T:EP:RA:G1.

Sincerely yours,

Ingrid Grinde, Manager
Employee Plans Technical Guidance and
Quality Assurance Group 1

Enclosures:
Deleted copy of letter ruling
Notice of Intention to Disclose

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace